For months now, I've been trying very hard for full disclosure of the making of Personal Data Protection Bill and the Justice Srikrishna Committee's work. All of this has been denied under RTI.
I had filed 3 Cases at the Central Info Commission.
Read on...
1/12
I moved the Madras HC seeking an urgent hearing in the matter bcuz if the Bill is passed in parliament, the cases at CIC would turn infructuous after 2 years. Court was pleased to direct so.
Now, this is what happened during the hearing at CIC and after-
2/12
@GoI_MeitY's officers raised new grounds for denying info. A copy of their written submissions was provided to me only 30 mins before hearing, after I hounded them for it.
I requested the CIC to allow me a day's time to file my counter to their new grounds for denial.
3/12
IC Vanaja N Sarna allowed. She also asked MeitY's officers to give detailed reasons and justify invoking this new exemption clause.
They didn't.
In my counter, I specifically told the CIC that MEITY has failed to justify denial & this is enough to order disclosure.
4/12
The spirit of Madras HC's order was that the CIC should decide whether info asked can be disclosed or not.
Instead...
the CIC simply passed the buck to the Ministry to justify the denial! Total abdication of responsibility by the CIC.
Orders attached.
5/12
A partial victory, however, with respect to my 2nd case.
CIC has ordered disclosure of certain files relating to appointment of certain entities to d Srikrishna Committee.
I made a specific request that Officers should sign an oath affidavit in case some info is not available.
This was accepted and will be done. Officers will be charged with perjury in case some info was later discovered to be illegally withheld or suppressed.
Also, some important observations made by the CIC, which could be useful for the public. Read on...
"CPIO should henceforth suo-motu send a copy of any subsequent submissions to the appellant so that he gets ample time to prepare his arguments to rebut the contentions of the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore advised to be careful in..."
9/12
While I wait for the reply of the CPIO 'justifying their denial', a source within Lok Sabha confirmed to me that the Joint Parliamentary Committee on PDP Bill has finalised the report & it has been put up before Chairperson for final orders.
I have an appeal...
10/12
The work till now took a lot of time & hard work, over many months. The orders of CIC on my 3 cases will likely have to be challenged in Court & I would request anyone who can afford to contribute to my fund, to do so here- rzp.io/l/supportsaurav
This would help me in...
11/12
Upping my resources. I would also like to see if we can challenge the "parliamentary privilege" clause being claimed by MEITY and set a new precedent for everyone's benefit. Govts can't get away with passing laws that can prove draconian for us.
Get ready for a string of #SorrySavarkar moments from our national media. The NBSA has asked prominent news channels to apologise to the nation as per this schedule-
Some great news to share with fellow activists & people.
The Govt of India has now decided to include a separate section, within the online RTI portal, for filing of RTIs under "threat to life and liberty", for which info must be provided within 48 hours. @SaketGokhale
1/4
The CIC, in April 2020 had advised the DoPT to device such a mechanism due to lack of proper implementation of this provision. As usual, nothing happened.
I moved the Madras HC seeking to effectuate this order. The first pic above reveals that the file moved after this.
2/4
I also filed an RTI seeking to know what happened to this CIC order. Proper info was not provided. The CPIO is a habitual offender & has time & again, either rejected or furnished unsatisfactory reply to many of my RTIs.
I wrote to Union Secretary, DoPT for his removal as CPIO.
NBSA has also warned @ABPNews@NewsNationTV@abpmajhatv for its violations of the code of ethics and broadcasting standards. News Nation had aired the picture of SSR's dead body but had sincerely apologised during the hearing at NBSA.
The order notes my objection to the sensational news coverage of SSR's death in which I described it as "abhorrent, shameful, insensitive, anti-human rights, unprofessional and sensational". @SaketGokhale@MnshaP@Tweet2Rhea@rohini_sgh
On April, 22 the Modi govt had announced a special package of 15,000 crores for the fight against corona. What the govt. concealed is the fact that the entire amount has been taken as a loan from int banks.
The PM-CARES had collected more than 9,000 crores by May 20, as per an @IndiaSpend report. But that figure was only acc. to publicly available press releases. The original amount was much more than that!
Instead of spending the amount from the entirely opaque PM-CARES fund, Modi govt was keener on borrowing money from international banks like Asian Development Bank, IBRD and AIIB. I spoke to @Jayati1609, UNDP award-winning development economist and JNU professor & she said this-
I have filed a PIL in the Madras High Court, through advocate MV Swaroop @TnagarTornado who was kind enough to take up this matter and argue it in court, seeking to strengthen the RTI regime in this country.
1. The constitution of a "Special COVID Bench" at the Central Info Commission & Tamil Nadu SIC to hear pandemic related matters on a priority basis because they may become infructuous if the normal waiting time of 2 years is followed.
2. It also seeks a unique email ID to be created by every public authority to receive RTIs & Appeals concerning life and liberty during this pandemic. This was ordered by the CIC in April but as expected, no action by @DoPTGoI