Mar 18, 2021 | 05:00 PM EDT DOUG KASS
Assessing the Damage
My Takeaways
* The damage today was broad-based
* I ended the day with a medium-sized net short exposure (down from very large at the beginning of the day)
* Banks may have had a buying climax today
* Tech
(especially of a speculative-kind) remains overvalued
I recently wrote that my (negative) market view has rarely been at such odds with the generally bullish consensus.
This remains the case.
Based on my view of "fair market value" the S&P is still about 20% overvalued.
That does not mean, however, that an overvalued market needs to return to its value -- as markets tend to spend long periods as overvalued (but only short periods of undervaluation, like in December, 2018 and in March, 2020).
It does mean the there is very little "margin of
of safety" at the (long) margin and that the upside reward is dwarfed by the downside risk.
As noted, I was active in my Index shorts during the trading session:
* I covered the first drop - moving my overall short exposure from very large to large.
* And I reshorted the
rally - moving my overall short exposure back to very large.
After the close, reflecting the severity and swiftness of the P.M. downturn I reduced from large to medium sized my Index shorts.
This takes me back down medium-sized in net short exposure from very large (and a bit
over my skis) net short.
In a market of heightened volatility, as we see these days, trading around my core positions is a continuing effort of mine.
Overall breadth on the NYSE was foul at 4-1 negative.
In terms of individual sectors:
* Bank stocks appeared to experience
something of a high volume climax that put the sector back into an even more seriously overbought condition. As posted in my Diary, I have been reducing positions, which were very large recently to small today. I continued to sell off some of my bank stocks on today's strong
absolute and relative price action. By the close of the day, a lot of the morning spikes were given back in the space.
* Tech as dreck. Amazon ($AMZN) was a big disappointment as were other large-cap tech-stocks like Microsoft ($MSFT) , Google ($GOOGL) , Twitter ($TWTR) ,
Tesla ($TSLA) and others. ($ARKK) was leaking (down to $120 from $131, where I added yesterday to my short).
* Spec Tech was also dreck. My short gewgaws like ($PTON) , ($MARA) , ($CAN) , ($RIOT) etc. continued the weakness that was so conspicuous on Wednesday.
* Cyclicals weak
ened. Retail was weaker (including ($WMT) ). Homebuilders got schmeissed (down between 6% and 8%). Airlines fell down to earth (I added to my ($DAL) short yesterday -- now between medium- and large- sized.)
Verizon ($VZ) , a large long holding, was the only non financial equity
on my screen that was green.
The 10 year U.S. note yield closed +7 basis point to 1.71%.
I will be out tomorrow but you will be in the capable hands of Bret Jensen.
Thanks for reading my Diary and enjoy the evening and the weekend.
@realmoney
Mar 18, 2021 | 05:00 PM EDT DOUG KASS
Assessing the Damage
My Takeaways
* The damage today was broad-based
* I ended the day with a medium-sized net short exposure (down from very large at the beginning of the day)
* Banks may have had a buying climax today
* Tech (especially of a speculative-kind) remains overvalued
I recently wrote that my (negative) market view has rarely been at such odds with the generally bullish consensus.
This remains the case.
Based on my view of "fair market value" the S&P is still about 20%
overvalued.
That does not mean, however, that an overvalued market needs to return to its value -- as markets tend to spend long periods as overvalued (but only short periods of undervaluation, like in December, 2018 and in March, 2020).
Coming up on @realmoney
Money Never Sleeps
* If you are intensely serious about trading sometimes you won't get much sleep
* Last night I moved back into a net short exposure (I sold Nasdaq and S&P futures early Sunday evening)
* The pivot from growth to value (that I have
expected over the last six months has intensified (and I expect it to continue)
* Avoid most technology stocks ($ARKK is my short proxy play) and consider holding on to and buying value on weakness (e.g. banks)
* After reloading on strength midweek, I remain short a number of
speculative gewgaws ($MARA, $CAN, $PLUG, $GBTC, $RIOT, etc.)
* Expect the continued regime of higher volatility to continue
"Somebody reminded me the other night that I once said "greed is good." I swear I don't remember it but it sounds like something I would say in the
Ok this is a good one.
Coming up on @realmoney
The Day the Liquidity Died
* We appear to be in a new regime of heightened volatility
* And in a market without memory from day to day
* Market focus, as we have predicted, has pivoted violently from growth to value
* I expect
this pivot to continue (and I own banks in size)
* And, with it, a loss of liquidity, as redemptions rise and many try to escape from the previously popular high tech darlings
“Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and life to
On a subjective basis, the level of speculative activity in the markets continues to boil and so does the hubris.
The individual stocks/vehicles change in every cycle - and so do the players. Gerry Tsai (Manhattan Funds), Tom Marsico (Janus Funds), Kevin Landis
(First Hand Funds) and three Freds (Mates, Carr and Alger) have all been replaced by Ark Invest's (ARKK) Cathie Wood, and her investments in disruptive technology, in the current speculative investing cycle.
Speculation is a condition that rears its head in every single Bull
Market I have seen since I started to invest when I was 15 years old.
Speculation dilates eyes so wide that risk is forgotten and pushed to the side by newly minted geniuses who, after losing most of their money, ultimately swear off stocks when the ship of fools leaves the
I find those that are opposed to my $ARKK are blind to my analysis that a virtuous cycle of inflows could easily morph into a vicious cycle of outflows. They are looking backwards in the rear view mirror of past performance (which is not necessarily a prelude to
future performance and they are mired in Cathie Wood's celebrity - which is not based on the past delivery of exceptional or consistent long term stock returns. They view the opportunities of disruptive technology as exciting and open ended without an appreciation of how
expensive and illiquid the constituent stocks are (particularly relative to ARK's large percentage ownership). Oddly those that are the most vocal in opposition of my $ARKK short are technically oriented - and I have not yet heard a technician seriously analyze the stock chart
I find those that are opposed to my $ARKK are blind to my analysis that a virtuous cycle of inflows could easily morph into a vicious cycle of outflows. They are looking backwards in the rear view mirror of past performance (which is not necessarily a prelude to future
performance and they are mired in Cathie Wood's celebrity - which is not based on long term or exceptional stock returns. They view the opportunities of disruptive technology as exciting and open ended without an appreciation of how expensive and illiquid the
constituent stocks are (particularly relative to ARK's large % ownership). Oddly those that are most vocal in opposition of my $ARKK short are technically oriented - and I have not yet heard a technician seriously analyze the stock charts of $ARKK