Thread by @BillyBostickson

David Asher does not like Daszak
hudson.org/research/16756…

Transcript: The Origins of COVID-19: Policy Implications and Lessons for the Future
David Asher & Miles Yu
hudson.org/research/16762…
and pdf
s3.amazonaws.com/media.hudson.o…

David Asher:
"I guess the first thing is to explain what an actual investigation is. It’s certainly not what the WHO is engaged in."

"I’m very doubtful that 3 people in highly protected circumstances in a *level 3* laboratory working on coronaviruses would all get sick with influenza that put them in a hospital all in the same week, and it didn’t have anything with the coronavirus. That’s hard to believe"

"**From that point forward, it certainly seemed to have started to spread within their community. We still don’t know all the details on that. We know most of which we’ve released. I can’t talk about things we haven’t"

"If you believe, as I do, that this might have been a weapons vector gone awry, not deliberately released but in development and then somehow leaked, this has turned out to be the greatest weapon in history."

"The fact that the initial cluster of victims surrounded the very institute that was doing the highly dangerous if not dubious research is significant."

"And the fact that they massively covered it up, destroyed evidence, and denied access in a way that they didn’t do in SARS-COVID-1 back in 2002, 2003."

"The other very important part is that this was a military program. It was a military program that curiously started probably around 2016 from what we can tell."

short section where Asher confuses the Israeli report on the November warning from US to NATO and Israel in 2019 with the revelations about the 3 early cases at WIV BSL3 Lab.

"Not a single person in the WHO kingdom knows a thing really about China as far as I can tell, let alone their military. Let alone how they use disinformation and information to obfuscate classified programs"

I also want to note that there is information which needs to be confirmed in the sequencing. Everyone says, “Oh, the sequencing. Everybody understands it. It’s very transparent.”pangolin.

I’ve had numerous experts to the U.S. and foreign governments in sequencing, so called bioinformatic science, tell me that there’s all sorts of indications in the sequence.

Anything is possible, but there are curiosities and artifacts in the sequence themselves that are extremely disturbing.

Andy Weber chips in and he knows about this:
"we continue to conduct this type of risky research not just in the US, not just in the North Carolina laby, the academic lab, but we export it overseas where we should have a policy of only working with laboratories...

..that meet our very strict bio safety standards. My own view is that if this type of research is justified, it should only occur, at least the U.S. funded research, should only occur in the most secure and safe U.S. labs. Not in academic labs & certainly not overseas.

Miles Yu nails the puppet scientists:
"That created a conflict of interest when it comes to searching for culpability for origin of all kinds of viruses in China. Because many scientists that have some interest involving this, I’m afraid to say this. "

David Asher: maybe I was speaking in a little bit of an exaggerated fashion earlier when I talked about pangolins and bats being mated. It’s not that they mate, it’s that they are engaged in cross mutations across species through deliberate scientific gain of function research,

which was most definitely published and going on at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and quite a few other places in China. And not just that it’s some BSL poor laboratory. It goes on in the United States as well.

Except for the fact that our own scientific community, beginning with Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci themselves, have made a multi billion dollar industry out of bio defense after 9/11. I’d like to see frankly evidence as an American taxpayer of what that actually produced.

The reason why I also am concerned about our own scientific community’s bias is that I heard from very well established scientists at our national labs who did not want to be quoted, who were very fearful of consequences,

that they found peculiarities in the exact sequences that people at the WHO and others are saying are pristine. There’s nothing irregular about them. They said, “No.” They’ve seen plenty of things that are irregular in their very sequences.

That’s a fundamental scientific fact that I have not seen addressed adequately. I hope that as Jamie builds the foundation for a broader investigation that we don’t ignore the sequencing data itself may have clues.