Trying to see around the corner is never easy but the set up for gen 1 food delivery marketplaces in 2021/2022 seems pretty attractive.
π²ππ
(1/x)
The full/partial unwind of virus life behavior may make marketplaceβs relative growth rates much more attractive vs the past year.
Re-urbanization and resumption of suburban pre-virus dining patterns may remind investors that marketplaces arenβt quite dead yet.
In fact there may be some things to like about them...
They clearly generate cash flow and there is no doubt about underlying profitability despite current consolidated results being less profitable.
A profit pool comes in handy when capital markets catch a cold which they invariably always do.
Tightness on the supply side (restaurant capacity & delivery personnel for all) may be a feature of 2021/22 but marketplaces ability to bend demand toward adequately staffed, self-delivery options is likely privileged vs logistics.
Broadly speaking, one goes to marketplaces to eat and to logistics/delivery anything apps to get a specific thing/meal. Marketplaces ability to shift demand at the margin is high.
Consequently, the unexpected rain storm in Chicago pressures a logistics operator > a marketplace operator. Yes logistic operators can bend demand as well but not like marketplaces can right now.
The marriage - or organic creation - of scaled marketplaces and logistic operators in a given geographic will eventually create a formidable enterprise.
If and when the South American river turns on the heat in local commerce/delivery + new participants lean into the space for growth then it will likely be open season for additional M&A that is currently off the table.
There should be plenty of opportunity for shareholder oriented mangement teams to mix and match their way to increased value.
(eom)
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Over the years, I've been involved in some real battleground names where the debate over the company's prospects was quite intense to say the least.
π£ππ»πͺ
(1/x)
With some of these companies, I, and other longs, have been opposite some highly reputable, brand name funds.
At one investor meeting many years ago, after going over a favored long at the time, I was hit with 'but so & so are short that name' to which I responded 'so what, weβre both going to be right.'
Some thoughts on a narrow topic: What $SFIX's service may look like as it continues to evolve. As usual I have ABSOLUTELY no view on short-term results or quarterly expectations.
ππππ ππ
(1/x)
My real interest lies in what the company might look like over the next 5 to 10 years. On that basis, Stitchfix remains a very interesting company to analyze.
The company continues to inch impressively closer to its end state: a 100% unique, personalized apparel showroom for consumers.
My instinct is that the market is currently setting business values that may be planting the seeds for the next round of consolidation in global delivery.
Among other things, business fundamentals and expectations combine to imprecisely drive share prices/asset values. In turn, those same share prices/values can also shift fundamental opportunity sets h/t reflexivity.
Changing prices can open up previously closed windows on strategic M&A and create new opportunities that might not otherwise exist at different values.
I confess I find cryptos - digital scarcity/placeholders/uniques - utterly fascinating.
π΅ππ’π°
(1/x)
I'm not an expert by any means but I think itβs possible that, like the internet, digital placeholders have a profound effect on the world and potentially rearrange winners & losers in select ecosystems.
My initial purchases of cryptos were simply to learn more about them and consider how they might affect companies I followed but since then I have continued to personally acquire portions of them at increasingly higher prices - primarily Bitcoin & Ethereum.