Should Americans be concerned about the US National Debt?

As I tell my students: No.

[THREAD]
This thread is inspired by seeing, in the wake of the $1.9 Trillion stimulus bill, much fretting over the size of the national debt.

But as @mcopelov has emphasized time and time again: such concerns are largely misplaced

To be clear, the US does indeed borrow A LOT!

$28+ Trillion at the moment.
And the amount REALLY took off starting in the early 21st century

Source: fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEBTN
Especially when compared to other countries (though the US is not the worst)

Source: data.oecd.org/gga/general-go…
BUT...the debt doesn't matter!

Why?

Three big reasons
Reason 1: The debt is mostly owned by...wait for it...Americans!
See for yourself. Go to the Treasury Bulletin...

fiscal.treasury.gov/reports-statem…
....scroll down to the "Federal Debt" link...
... and open the document. It gives a complete breakdown of how much debt is held by which entities
Two things to note.

First, the Federal Reserve is a pretty big holder of US debt. We'll come back to that.
Second, it is indeed the case that a non-trivial amount of the debt is held by foreign governments.

But WHO holds that debt?
You can find out straight from @USTreasury, as they maintain a monthly update on "MAJOR FOREIGN HOLDERS OF TREASURY SECURITIES"

ticdata.treasury.gov/Publish/mfh.txt
According to the latest report, in January 2021, the largest holders were 🇯🇵 &🇨🇳, followed in a distant third by 🇬🇧, then 🇮🇪, etc.
One thing to notice about that list. It's true that China is a big holder of the debt (they hold a little over 10%) and, well, we aren't on the best of terms with China right now.
warontherocks.com/2020/10/compet…
But notice that a number of the top countries on that list, including #1, are key US allies.
Hmmm....seems to suggest that maybe, just maybe, there's something valuable about maintaining those alliances🤔

Something worth thinking about, as @CarlaNorrlof, @richardmaass, & @dandrezner did in this @Journal_IS correspondence
belfercenter.org/publication/co…
Reason 2: Dollar Hegemony.

💵 is the most widely held currency on 🌏
When we say that foreign central banks hold "currency reserves" what we really mean is that they hold "US dollars"...and the second most widely held currency, 💶, is not really close

Source: data.imf.org/?sk=E6A5F467-C…
Why does this matter?

If foreign banks want to hold dollars, how do you think they hold those dollars?

That's right, by holding US bonds (so they can make a return)
Why is the US$ the global key currency?
nytimes.com/2019/02/22/bus…
Lot's of reasons: legacy, oil, geopolitics.

@CarlaNorrlof, @Bree_Croteau, @aashna_114, @daniel_mcdowell, @whinecough, Hongying Wang, Benjamin J Cohen, & 🙋‍♂️ lay it all out in this @ISP_Journal symposium
academic.oup.com/isp/article/21…
Reason Three: The Federal Reserve.
Besides being a big holder of the debt, the Fed has the ability to hold more...and more...and more.

americanbanker.com/news/the-natio…
This is exactly what the Fed did during World War II...and during World War I (and what a LOT of other central banks have done)

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
In fact, we really don't know how much the Fed could hold (because, if you recall, they have the ability to create money by 🪄)
Do the above reasons apply to sovereign debt in general? Is it pointless for any government to worry about it's debt?

No. These arguments only apply to the US. It's what Giscard d'Estaing called "Exorbitant privilege"
So when it comes to the US National Debt, just don't worry about it.

[END]
P.S. While I'm at it: these arguments are also why you shouldn't compare the US government (or any government) to a business or household.
Addendum: For more details and specifics on this issue from the perspective of the Fed, definitely check out @dandolfa's discussion 👇

stlouisfed.org/publications/r…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

17 Mar
How much does 🇺🇸 spend on defense compared to the rest of 🌏?

That's a hard question to answer. For starters, we don't precisely know how much 🇺🇸 spends on defense (& that's the easy part).

[THREAD]
This thread is inspired by a debate several folks were having recently about comparing US defense spending to that of other countries
So how much does the US spend on defense?

One might think this is simply a budgeting and accounting exercise. That's part of it, but it's actually a conceptual exercise: what do we mean by "defense" or "national security"

jstor.org/stable/2145138…
Read 18 tweets
10 Mar
Why did the US invade Iraq in 2003?

Retaliation for 9/11? A demonstration of US power? Saddam Hussein was a threat? Bush had a personal vendetta to settle? A mistake? All of the above?

The reality is that we don't know.

[THREAD]
This thread is partly motivated by what @_danigilbert recently observed

To start, let's give some background and review the war's lead-up.
Read 53 tweets
6 Mar
The @WhiteHouse released an "Interim National Security Strategic Guidance" this week. After reading it, I'm sure international relations scholars will go.....hmmmmmm 🤔

[THREAD]

whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Don't get me wrong. I agree with @MatthewKroenig that releasing this document is a good thing: folks are anxious to know more about what "America is Back" means. This document offers some...well..."guidance" (hence the name)

And given how early it is being released (for example, 2017 NSS wasn't released until December of Trump's first year) sends a useful signal about intentions

Read 32 tweets
27 Feb
Possible 🇺🇸 arms sales restrictions on 🇸🇦 raises a question: Is there such a thing as a "defensive weapon"? Can some weapons ONLY be used to STOP attacks?

International Relations scholars are (mostly) unanimous: No

[THREAD]
reuters.com/article/usa-sa…
To be clear, it is possible that a weapon will only be USED to stop attacks, not attack others.

After all, that's the heart of "self-defense" clause in Article 51 of the UN Charter

legal.un.org/repertory/art5…
Also, it is possible that a state's military will have a "defensive strategy" -- i.e. non-expansionist -- rather than an "offensive strategy" -- i.e. expansionist.

Indeed, that is a core part of the theory in my book "Arguing About Alliances"
cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/978150174…
Read 25 tweets
24 Feb
What causes civil wars? Are they driven by ethnic differences? By poverty? Something else?

Here is how my Quantitative Security students will explore those questions.

[THREAD]
Unlike the quantitative study of interstate war, civil wars didn't receive big attention until the 1990s. That decade witnessed a spike in the number of internal wars, especially relative to "inter-state wars".

Source: ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace & @UCDP
An important early paper seeking to identify trends in civil wars was by Licklider in @apsrjournal
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Read 31 tweets
20 Feb
Because it apparently needs to be said: "Imperial Policing" is not a good model for US foreign policy to imitate.

[THREAD]
This thread is prompted, in part, by this statement from Robert Kagan (h/t @mcneillcasey for highlighting it) in a new @ForeignAffairs piece.
Here is the full article
foreignaffairs.com/articles/unite…
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!