2/5) - Future genesis airdrops - $ANC airdrop gave 7% in one day by $ value - future launches may not match in airdrop value
- Risk - risk free staking
2 - Luna liquid staking - provide $luna as collateral (locked for 21 days like Luna staking). borrow $UST against collateral
3/5) - net borrow apy ($ANC farming) - 330%+
- net APR far outweighs standard rewards
- no staking rewards & no weekly or genesis airdrops
- Risk - liquidation risk of bLuna if Luna price drops
- you wont be staking with smart stake anymore 🤣
Conclusion:
- no easy choice
4/5) -
- Go for Liquid Staking - if you fancy some risk, you can get lot of APY. Luna price being x factor
- Go for regular Staking - if you want risk free rewards & get small little portions of $ANC, $MIR & genesis/weekly airdrops from future launches. Airdrops being x factor.
5/5) - May be you can go 50:50
BTW: you can also do lots of things with the borrowed $UST leading to further returns with liquid staking borrowed $UST
What is your strategy?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
- in Oct 2020, was looking for a fundamentally strong project to validate in. based on a discussion with a crypto buddy that uses @SmartStake in multiple chains, started looking into Terra
- It was live for 16 months & starting as a validator is a no-no
2/10 - Seeing the fundamentals, the outward looking focus, decided to jump in & setup my validator
- Was a tiny community full of passionate folks Seb @NicholasFlamelX@kundunsan@Lu_It_Haeng Nacho, Aayush with firm belief that #Terra belongs @ #3 (after BTC & ETH)
- $Luna @ 0.30
3/10 - after remaining on the fringes for a bit, saw that community had questions about Luna supply changes ... more specifically, the reducing Luna supply and where it is going. Terra.smartstake.io was born to answer some of the questions
1/8 - #Terra $Luna supply future outlook analysis & its likely consequences
- to meet $UST demand, $Luna continues to be burned to mint more $UST
- 6.6m $Luna burnt in each of the last 2 days
- terra.smartstake.io/history shows the burn & supply metrics
2/8 - pace is expected to remain at this level in near future & if anything may increase when proposal station.terra.money/proposal/36 is passed
- assumption - all network parameters remain as is i.e. same $Luna price, same staking ratio, TFL holdings not required 4 burning $Luna
3/8 - assumption - same $UST demand as today or atleast enough demand to not require the reverse flow (i.e. burn $UST & mint $Luna)
consideration - 64.4m staked amount from TFL holdings is excluded from calculations (plays no role in outcome)