Scenes in Bristol very depressing. You shouldn't attack cops. You shouldn't attack anyone, ever, for any reason.
And now, as sure as rain, Patel will say that scenes like these are why they need to give the police new powers. Even though the powers are nothing to do with events like today, and everything you do with silencing peaceful protest.
It'll be a completely fake argument, but for many people watching on TV, who won't have read the bill and only have a vague understanding of what's in it, it'll ring true.
We already had an extremely difficult task trying to stop this bill, or at least water it down. It just became a lot harder.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alexi McCammond loses her job at Teen Vogue because of tweets she sent when she was 17. BBC Breakfast presenters told to apologise for failing to show sufficient respect for the flag. Censorship is demonstrably out of control on right and left politics.co.uk/comment/2021/0…
The usual kickback against this is that it's both-sides-ism. But sometimes both sides of political disputes do have similar problems and that does not become irrelevant because Trump happened to shat out his mouth that one time.
We're trapped in a situation where parts of left insist their censorship does not exist, or should be redefined as harmless, while parts of the right can only conceive of censorship as something the left do.
Jesus Christ are people actually saying I should watch the Snyder Cut?
I would like to be wrong. There really is no film I would rather watch than a decent Justice League. But my idea of what is decent does not involve them saying fuck and snapping people's necks.
Fuck it, I'm clearly going to give it a go. I can tell I've already decided and am merely pretending otherwise to myself.
This is a law enforcing the silencing of protestors. But the most alarming thing about it was not its provisions. It was the silence from ministers about what it contained and the silence from Tory backbenchers about their duty to scrutinise it.
I keep thinking back to this thing that a Hungarian journalist told me about living under Orban. That the scariest part was when the silence came - when the newspapers stopped criticising and the protests stopped happening. That's when you knew you were fucked good and proper.
Day two of the anti-protest bill debate is going to start in about 15mins. For some unfathomable reason which I now deeply regret, I have committed to live tweeting it.
If you're not interested in the police, crime, sentencing and courts bill: mute this thread. Seriously. I'm like the haggard old man at the gas station at the start of a horror movie, telling the kids not to go to the cabin the woods.
This is yesterday's thread from the debate, if you missed the excitement of watching a country's moral capacity degrade in real time.
The police bill "may create uncertainty by giving far too much discretion to the police in determining this balance, and far too much power to the executive to change the law by decree if it chooses" conservativehome.com/platform/2021/…
This is a very interesting joint piece by Brexiter Steve Baker & Remainer Dominic Grieve for ConHome. It may encourage some Tories to take a closer look at the bill they have been defending.
But it ends with a very one-the-one-hand-and-on-the-other section which pretty much sets the battle for committee stage. Basically saying to MPs: vote it through for now and we'll see if we can fix the troublesome bits as it progresses.
Right, you know that shit is fucked up because I'm going to do a live thread of the Commons debate.
If you are not interested in the policing bill, please mute this thread now, because I suspect it's going to be very long.
We've got Priti Patel up in the Commons at 3:30pm to make a statement about the police attack on the vigil over the weekend. Then the debate on the policing bill starts. It'll go on until 10pm, then restart again tomorrow, when there'll be a vote.