Nice surroundings with recitation of the aruNa section of the AraNyaka of the taittirIya-s. It includes the yajuSh-es on which the famous subrahmaNya sAman inviting indra to the soma offering is based: indra who appeared as a ram to medhAtithi kANva; as a woman to vR^iShaNashva;
who prances like a gaur bull; who became the lover of ahalyA; who became a brAhmaNa of the kaushika clan; who was called gautama.The anindra tradition that engulfed later H though misinterpret the original meanings of these special exploits of the supreme god by which the R^itvik
pleases indra with singing of the subrahmaNya sAman. The original vaidika tales go thus. indra enjoyed the pleasure of both the female (becoming menA to vR^iShaNashva) and male (as the lover of ahalyA maitreyI). The later exploit may be interpreted in 2 ways. As in the RV ahalyA
is the unploughed field which indra fertilizes as in the sUkta for farming by vAmadeva gautama. Or as the kauthuma tradition holds he became a brAhmaNa of the kaushika clan & became to lover of ahalyA maitreyI. The jaiminIya tradition holds that as indra fought a battle with the
asura-s the shruti was destroyed; hence, becoming a son of vishvAmitra he learned the shruti from the former to restore it: hence, kaushika brAhmaNa | Finally, the jaiminIya tradition says that once when the deva-s & asura-s were advancing for battle indra that gautama was
performing tapasya in the zone between where the armies of the two were stationed. Hence, indra asked gautama to become a spy for the deva-s & report about the asura movements. But gautama refused either because he did not want to be a combatant or break his tapasya. Hence, indra
told him that he could continue and indra himself would instead take the form of gautama and spy on the asura-s. Hence, it is gautama bruvANa | indra who is all this is then asked to come to soma offering with aruNAshva -- the solar chariot -- in the aruNaketuka-chayana.
^aruNAShva-s: the 8 vasu-s led by the god agni in the solar chariot.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with manasataramgini

manasataramgini Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blog_supplement

20 Mar
The equivalent of chaNDeshvara when the solar ectype of sadAshiva is worshipped.
The saiddhAntika shaiva-s open their pUjAkrama with the worship of shiva in the sphere of the sun: This is followed by the worship of the planetary archons surrounding the AdityAtmaka sadAshiva. This aspect of saiddhAntika practice closely mirrors the the practice of netratantra
shaiva-s worshipping tryambaka netranAtha that is preserved in the Kashmirian tradition and has its deep roots in the early shaiva vaidika mahAnyAsa worshipping AdityAtmaka-rudra. The distinctive feature of the shaiva practice is the invocation of tejashchaNDa as the equivalent
Read 4 tweets
3 Mar
The genesis of the kapila figure has a complex history to it & is associated with 3 distinct elements:
1) His early (probably very 1st mention in the shruti) is in the shaiva upaniShat shvetAshvatara -1 of the late upaniShat-s associated with the yajurveda
manasataramgini.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/sam…
This memory continues down to the much later shaiva texts as noted in the article linked above.
2) By the time of the rAmAyaNa we hear of a ferocious v1 dwelling in pAtAla who incinerated the 60000 sons of sagara. This kapila in the pA~ncharAtrika mantra tradition is identified
with the fierce backward or 4th face of viShNu-chaturAtman, the 3 other faces being the regular viShNu or saumya face, nR^isiMha & varAha. That face can be seen in this Kashmirian image:
By the time of the mahAbharata this kapila who burnt the sAgara-s is
Read 10 tweets
28 Feb
Just putting some thoughts out there based on responses. First two raise the hope that this might be the passing phase. Even some Americans have voiced a similar position: "when reality hits they will return". I wish that were true

but the way I'm seeing it right now it feels different. This is not a rebellion into vacuum but the embracing of a new religion with a community of its own, access to the power structure under piNDaka's benign rule, a sense of victory over vijayanAma-vyApArin etc. So I don't see
them returning unlike the "rebels" of my older generation. There they had rebelled into a vacuum and the realities of life & the need to rear their own kids brought them back in line -- in short they never felt part of a cult. Here navyonmAda offer a cult with power opportunities
Read 6 tweets
27 Feb
The once vigorous lankan flavor of the Hindu tradition had several rituals with deshIya liturgies which were marginalized or exterminated relatively recently by the resurgent sthaviravAdin-s of the shAkyamata. Some examples included the extensive sekra-geDi-shAntiya, an aindra
ritual. One major center of his ritual was Padeniya in lankA where a temple housed his image. Now believed to have been absorbed into the saugata vihAra where the idol is still apparently there. He is said to have sent viShNu to aid the vijayan colonization of lankA from India&
along with viShNu and rudra invented the brAhmI script for the lankans to write and wrote out the word svasti as an illustration. Another such text was the pattinI-yAga which laid out the ritual for the goddess patnI. Then the amara-shAntiya to various deva-s & the planetary
Read 8 tweets
25 Feb
@omarali50 I think I agree with the broad thrust of Dr. Khan's presentation but disagree with 2 specifics: 1) indra was not a BMAC deity acquired by IA (long story but that claim can be falsified in more than one way). 2)The veda-s (my own side sometimes sees it that way) are not a monolith
@omarali50 from a historical perspective. In my reconstruction the later parts were composed after the Arya-s had conquered & settled in northern India. At that time they definitely encountered peoples who were more melanized than them :e.g. nishAda & kirAta & probably the original shUdra
@omarali50 who were perhaps an antagonistic fraction of the Harappan/Harappan periphery people (in the old context not what the term meant later as a hold all 4th varNa). However, contrary to occidental indologists whom he's evidently following, I have strong reasons to argue that the
Read 11 tweets
20 Feb
@parithranaya As far as the marAThA english conflict R. Cooper's work still remains useful. I think the marAThA attention to military modernization has been vastly ignored e.g. the English sources themselves record indigenous production by mahAdjI shinde of ordnance at Agra. His forces were
@parithranaya equipped with these weapons in battle & much latter Duke of Wellington remarks about their successors: "ordnance so good and so well-equipped that it answers for our service" Thus he systematically took up marAThA artillery into English formations. Moreover, marAThA's sought
@parithranaya foreign experts not to just buy weaponry but to obtain advice on making their own. For example, shinde consulted extensively with Scottish engineer Sangster while establish 1 of the largest arms production centers in the country at Agra. His khArkhAna had 5 divisions producing
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!