Before I started seminary, I met up with some graduating Korean American seminarians to hear about their experience.
I heard several of them share the racist things their White classmates, future ministers of the gospel, had said to them on various occasions on campus.
Things including making fun of the shape of their eyes, racial jokes, and other deeply insensitive comments and assumptions regarding their ability to speak English. I heard about how they had visited nearby White Reformed churches and had had awful experiences and were often
just invisible.
I didn't think anything of it at the time because I had convinced myself that I was Reformed enough to be invincible of racism. I was dead wrong, and I keep thinking about these conversations I had with these Korean American brothers, especially as the anti-Asian
racism increases in our nation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2017, I was working for @WhiteHorseInn as one of the leaders of the organization. At the time, I was optimistic that the organization was making strides toward racial justice.
After the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, I waited
to see what our editorial team at @Core_Christ and @WhiteHorseInn would do to respond. The organization had written on topics related to racism and social justice before, so it was well within the orbit of the organization to respond to this event.
After days of silence, I realized that no one else on the leadership was going to initiate a response. So, I decided to write a piece titled "Is Racism a Gospel Issue or a Social Issue?" The article was very barebones. It was simply looking at passages in the Bible that show
What's fascinating about Shenvi's article is that he throws out the historical Reformed understanding (including Calvin's commentaries on these biblical passages) in favor of biblicism. Rather than allowing there to be mystery and what J.I. Packer called "antinomies"
of two *seemingly* contradictory truths (like the antinomy of divine sovereignty and human responsibility), Shenvi "rounds the edges" of biblical passages using a biblicistic hermeneutic. On top of that, he cites the Westminster Confession of Faith as an interesting but mistaken
way of trying to show he's within the Reformed tradition.
I commend Calvin's commentaries on the pertinent passages of Scripture.
A PR statement prioritizes minimizing damage to an institution's reputation. It does its best to distance the institution and its leaders from the wrongdoing in order to repristinate it in the eyes of the public.
Many churches are good at making PR statements.
A statement of lament and repentance prioritizes healing those who have been hurt. It brings the institution and its leaders as close as possible to the wrongdoing in order to bring about deep soul-searching and urgency toward bringing healing to those who have been harmed.
A PR statement ultimately shows a desire for the fear of man, where everything is about image, optics, and saving face before the public's watching eye.
A statement of lament and repentance ultimately shows a desire for the fear of the Lord. Everything - including reputation -
"Long isn’t an active member at some church out there in Evangelicalism; he is a part of a church that is similar to what many of us call home... Long could have come from our pews and fellowship halls."
"Earnest and Long could have come from any of our churches, no matter how doctrinally sound we think we are. We could have sang besides them in church, listened to sermons with them, met in the same fellowship groups as them, witnessed their baptisms, and communed with them at
the Eucharist. And yet they both had hearts that could justify the killing of image-bearers — whether they were of Jewish descent or Asian descent. They saw their victims as “problems” that “needed to be eliminated.” How can we who are non-White know for certain that we will not
Those who have experienced spiritual abuse and ostracization often find it very difficult to create new and lasting friendships among Christians. It's very difficult to trust and be vulnerable with the nagging sense that there's a chance you'll have your back stabbed again.
Even when victims of spiritual abuse and toxic church cultures know in their minds that there is no reason to distrust someone, their bodies have been conditioned to recoil and brace for impact because of previous experiences. They can come off as cold or aloof.
Some go through a mental calculus in order to determine whether it is "worth it" to invest in a friendship because there are so many possibilities of PTSD, even when people are being the best-intentioned to hear their stories of spiritual abuse. Friendships have additional
A good way to convince people that they need to take what the Bible says seriously is by showing that you take it seriously when it calls you to love your neighbor, pray for your enemies, care for the least of these, bear your cross, bear one another's burdens, and pursue peace.
The "apologetic of action" has always been powerful in the history of the church. Multitudes of people did not come into proximity to the life of the church because they were convinced of some abstract apologetic argument. Rather, it was because Christians were living out
a new ethic from a new kingdom from a God who speaks life through his Word. They saw goodness and blessing pour over from the lives of Christians. "Could Jesus be real?" was not an abstract question, but a question they asked when they saw the poor fed, the wounded healed,