Share this page!

Larry Sanger Profile picture
Twitter logo
23 Mar, 4 tweets, 2 min read
@Amy_Siskind Unless he's a white Christian.

In that case, demonize the killer with the attention of having his name widely known and associated with the inherent evils of Christian white males.

Right?

Just checking. Want to make sure I'm getting this right.
@Amy_Siskind This guy is OK to name, to fully profile, to associate his evil crimes with his religion, etc. Right?

Maybe you want to add: it's *important* to name and shame people like him. Right?

foxnews.com/us/who-is-atla…
@Amy_Siskind Meanwhile, you disapprove of this coverage, because it reports an Arabic name, and shows a picture of him?

thesun.co.uk/news/14431741/…
@Amy_Siskind Oh, no...this is even worse. Not only does it name him, it has the temerity to report, "A Facebook page appearing to be that of the suspect features posts with quotes from the Islamic Prophet Muhammad."

msn.com/en-us/news/cri…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Larry Sanger

Larry Sanger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lsanger

Larry Sanger Profile picture
16 Mar
At some point, Twitter's refusal to remove chi1d p0rn stops being a mere violation of 230 and counts as participating in the crime, @Jack>

dailywire.com/news/twitter-m… | via startthis.org/?p=536
Twitter's refusal to stop this horrible crime taking place on its own website looks delibate, considering—well, just look:
thenextweb.com/socialmedia/20…
This is not just the opinion of a few people. Russia has threatened to block Twitter if they don't "take steps to remove banned content," including ch!ld po4n:
msn.com/en-us/news/tec…
Read 10 tweets
Larry Sanger Profile picture
9 Mar
Maybe the Bible won't be cancelled after Dr. Seuss and "When Harry Became Sally." Progressives mock the idea. OK; I have a question:

Why not?

foxnews.com/media/amazon-c… | via startthis.org/?p=523
I mean, it's a fair question. If companies are pressured to cancel/block content for racially insensitive depictions of people, for criticizing trans ideology, for being by Clarence Thomas during Black History Month, for being a conservative forum, etc., then why *not* cancel...
...the Bible? The Bible advocates against gender equality, says slavery is OK (well, it does, sort of), recommends brutal treatment of adherents of pagan religions, threatens nonbelievers generally with hellfire, and even has God commanding genocide.

Well?
Read 23 tweets
Larry Sanger Profile picture
6 Mar
The Against the People Act/Enabling Voter Fraud Act, is shockingly horrific. Federalizes the process & legalizes all dirty tricks>

m.theepochtimes.com/key-things-you… | via startthis.org/?p=509
Federalizes elections
Can sue only in DC District Court
Mandates motor voter in all states
No witness/notary needed for absentee ballots
Prevents removing ineligible voters or confirming voter eligibility(!)
Bans voter ID laws
Lets illegal immigrants vote
Same-day registration
Censors “misleading” election info(!)
Allows felons to vote
Mandates early voting
Mandates vote by-mail w/o ID or witness
Lets 3rd parties turn in bundles of ballots
Requires states to accept ballots 10 days after
Makes unis hire campus vote coordinators
Read 4 tweets
Larry Sanger Profile picture
6 Mar
Australia's ABC ordered journalists not to refer to child rapists as "pedophiles," because that would hurt the feelings of pedophiles. Never mind that pedophiles are evil (see larrysanger.org/2019/12/why-pe…).

noqreport.com/2021/03/05/aus… | via startthis.org/?p=495
See, the ABC policymakers figure pedophiles might not actually rape children. So you wouldn't want to create an implication of guilt by association.

Never mind that pedophiles *want* to rape children.
It would like an edgy trend of wanting to rape women...without actually, you know raping women. How *dare* you call the rapeophiles rapists? They're just rapeophiles! How insensitive! Don't you know how hard it is to be a rapeophile today?!
Read 4 tweets
Larry Sanger Profile picture
28 Feb
The responses to this tweet from a senator are chilling. Democrats really, really mean it when they say they loathe Republicans. Apparently, Republicans want minorities dead, are Nazis, and are not the equals of Dems. You can’t be friends with them, period...
Just...if you respond to those people, try to do it in a gentle way, that makes it harder for them to continue in their mindless, bigoted attitude.
Looks like Murphy is being cancelled for saying a Republicans might be OK in some cases.
Read 5 tweets
Larry Sanger Profile picture
6 Feb
Hi there @Chase Bank, do you realize that when you cut off the business of some company due to their political affiliation, you are alienating everyone that shares that affiliation? Surely you know this hurts your business. You know? Mkay then. | via startthis.org/?p=354
LOL
Just punching up, here. Don’t mind me.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @lsanger has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @lsanger!

Read all threads by @lsanger