The YRR movement (Reformed evangelicalism) has fractured into something now unrecognizable. I think a major reason for this can be found in some of Bonhoeffer’s words in Life Together. 2/
Bonhoeffer argued: 1. Christ’s community is founded upon our shared relationship with Jesus 2. Because of this we can NEVER have direct fellowship with one another. It is ALWAYS mediated by Christ. 3/
3. But human love “seeks direct contact with the other person; it loves him not as a free person but as one whom it binds to itself.” (24) 4/
4. When human love drives fellowship we will never be able to “meet the other person with the clear Word of God and be ready to leave him alone with this Word for a long time…” (26) 5/
5. If we cannot “leave [people] freedom to be Christ’s” then all we will ever produce are hothouse flowers fully dependent upon us to nurture them. 6/
Out of this principle flows so much of the celebrity culture we created, the calls for church discipline which border on blood-lust, the angry discernment blogging, all of it. 7/
If we cannot trust Jesus with His church, we’ll destroy it with our own hands. And it’ll become something that doesn’t resemble Christ. It’ll bear the name church still but now only have our DNA. 8/
We’ll bruise people in the name of Jesus, long after He has departed. And we’ll call it “protecting the sheep” but in actuality it’s us protecting OUR own flock and not His. 9/
I tried making some of these points about the YRR but in reality, this is all over the place. We aren’t very good about entrusting others to Jesus. And it’s killing us. 10/
There is hope, though. Jesus is bigger than our ignorance. As our self-built communities collapse, Jesus still shines. Some of the pain we are feeling at all this fracturing is actually stripping away things which bear the name of Jesus but do not have his fingerprints. 11/
We’re in a great place to see Jesus. As movements fall, Christ remains. This is good. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵I have a confession to make an apology to @BethMooreLPM This is my story and I’m not intending to imply it’s true of all others. But I bet I’m not alone. 1/
I used to call Beth Moore a false teacher. (Probably 7-10 years ago) I didn’t encourage others to do her Bible studies. In fact I discouraged it. I had NEVER read her stuff.
2/
So why did I do this? 1) I had read snippets 2) I believed discernment bloggers 3) I allowed an untested narrative develop in my mind. But more that anything... 3/
A thread on Jesus healing what his followers break because many of you haven’t yet realized your deep need to read and follow my blog, and because this is too important to let die in said wilderness. 1/
Malchus’ ear shouldn’t be there. One of Jesus’ disciples had lopped it off. Malchus bore the pain of Peter’s misapplied conclusions about the Messiah. 2/
But his ear is there. And it’s there because Jesus picked up the bloody thing and miraculously reattached it. Or to say that another way… 3/
I keep seeing CBN and those of their ilk throw out this charge of protecting the sufficiency of Scripture. It's bunk. They're actually not doing justice to what that doctrine historically means. And they end up diminishing the Bible. 1/
You can use a butter knife to open lots of things. But if you start calling it a can opener you run into problems when it doesn't open certain cans. 2/
And it's really dangerous when you start yelling at the guy using a can opener instead of a butter knife. That's what CBN is doing right now. 3/
🧵. I am a firm believer that biblical counseling is helpful for many things. BUT I think it needs some help in the area of trauma. I’ll share a bit of my own story and explain why I say this. 1/
In Strong in the Broken Places 5 childhood traumas are listed: Physical abuse, sexual abuse, parental substance abuse, extreme neglect, and witnessing domestic violence.
My daily life was made up of 3 out of these 5. Another one was for about a 2 year period. So I score a 4. 2/
I took this trauma into my marriage, into the pastorate, and into my own parenting. (As a side note, praise God, my kids would score a 0 out of 5).
3/
Picture this: “true companion” of Philippians 4:3 took Paul’s charge to “help these women.” And he/she followed Paul’s method by lifting up the gospel as supreme, thus uniting them under shared gospel identity.
Step 1, gospel, gospel, gospel. Together for the gospel. 1/
We could pretend that the spat was over the use of the DH in the National League OR something more serious like the care of Hellenistic widows. Either way gospel identity is of greater value. When true companion reminds of the gospel, unity happens when both parties embrace. 2/
But what happens if 2-3 years down the road when a debate on the DH flares up again and thus time true companion picks a side and says the only Christian position is a DH in the NL? What does that do to Together for the Gospel? 3/