Once I get this story up, it's gonna be [redacted] for you [redacteds]
Look all I am saying is that I literally am taking next week off to make up for the fact that I’ve been working on this story during what is supposed to be a PTO week. I’m all about that work-life balance and would not do this for many stories.
🤔👑🧐👑🗒🕵🏼👑✍🏻👑👩🏼💻
Very important development in the Hall household today: Phoebe self-soothed herself to sleep for the FIRST TIME in the apartment
DC-based puppy fails to make compelling argument for mud romping:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Before Harry + Meghan’s Oprah interview, it’s worth noting how the narrative re: why they left royal life has been twisted by the (UK) media to “They want privacy.”
But that isn’t their issue w/ the press. It’s double standards + false/biased reporting
Last year I compared UK media coverage of Meghan Markle + Prince Harry to that of Kate Middleton + Prince William.
Limited scope: only stories from the same news org written AFTER weddings + only outlets in the royal rota.
And there’s more. If you look at the coverage of Meghan from after she married Harry (aka once she was royal) until they “stepped back,” you’ll see thousands of negative, sensationalist stories, which are often thinly sourced and of somewhat dubious news value.