Update: To make up for how distracted I've been today, she's going to get to go to the dog park and romp off-leash as soon as my story goes up. Will be back on Twitter after I give her a bunch of attention and (sigh) probably a bath.
Once I get this story up, it's gonna be [redacted] for you [redacteds]
Look all I am saying is that I literally am taking next week off to make up for the fact that Iβve been working on this story during what is supposed to be a PTO week. Iβm all about that work-life balance and would not do this for many stories.
Before Harry + Meghanβs Oprah interview, itβs worth noting how the narrative re: why they left royal life has been twisted by the (UK) media to βThey want privacy.β
But that isnβt their issue w/ the press. Itβs double standards + false/biased reporting
Last year I compared UK media coverage of Meghan Markle + Prince Harry to that of Kate Middleton + Prince William.
Limited scope: only stories from the same news org written AFTER weddings + only outlets in the royal rota.
And thereβs more. If you look at the coverage of Meghan from after she married Harry (aka once she was royal) until they βstepped back,β youβll see thousands of negative, sensationalist stories, which are often thinly sourced and of somewhat dubious news value.