@JW3London hosting @Baddiel & @YehudisFletcher discussing whether Jewish differences between Charedim & others Jews are reconcilable.
DB tells us he disparages religion generally & practices affecting health in lockdown are fair game for public criticism. #reconcilabledifferences
YF doesn’t accept flouting lockdown as a religious position but a cultural one, not driven by Jewish values. Nor are Jews - including Charedim - responsible for bigotry against them.
Charedim are diverse. People in positions of power push positions #reconcilabledifferences
Charedim are “othered” by Jews as well as non-Jews. That can be unconscious.
DB - there can be unconscious antisemitism but there are no non-malicious antisemites. But religious dictat is stupid. The people aren’t idiots but the practices are.
DB has been asked to see if Charedi community can be reached via vaccination. The feeling was “Having the Chief Rabbi to do it is like having the Pope”. Not listening is stupid.
YF not explaining da’at torah: your Rabbi can give you advice. This has been grotesquely expanded to
include things like operations (or vaccines). That is stupidity.
But the Jewish community has abandoned the Charedim to the racism of low expectations. Practices are winked at as somehow “authentic” without being challenged [wow]. That leaves the vulnerable, vulnerable.
DB attacks on the internal gun organised religion holds to your head. @HCGQC (Chair) asks if it’s possible to let go.
YF says yes, but not everyone likes it. But she isn’t as unique as people think. There are now discussions within the community.
DB says how can it change?
YF: we have to educate the community.
HG asks who IS a Charedi Jews?
YF: heritage, good Jewish education, little secular education. You can say it’s an ideology but there are plenty of non-frum Charedim.
DB: Jewishness is elusive. I left practice behind when I left school. But
the identity is multiform. I acknowledge religion - I’m going to a zoom Seder - but it’s not because of God. It’s because of who I am though I don’t believe in God. Complicated.
It doesn’t give me a moral sense although I like truth. And I think that came elsewhere.
YF: that matches Charedi views - it’s a way of life & your entire social system. It’s a v communal life. Leaving that is a huge leap.
HG: don’t Charedim “other” us?
YF: yes & it justifies adherence. But I reject that narrative - my beliefs aren’t threatened by other thinking.
DB: that’s part & parcel of being religious. I feel patronised occasionally.
I was once asked to light the menorah, said I was an atheist, & he said “so am I”. He expected me to say yes so I said no.
YF: there are atheist Charedim as well. It’s cultural, not fuelled by religion.
DB: I like doubt.
YF: they may not admit to it but they have it.
DB: I don’t respect blind belief - I don’t condemn it. I’ve sympathy for obedience but no intellectual respect.
YF: no one is owed engagement but people can still be respected. Everyone can set their own boundaries.
I don’t respect everyone. Human rights abuses are utterly condemned & the framework that upholds them is rejected. Even if I respect individuals. Visibility can be a curse.
YF: NHS England don’t understand the community. We’re at a boiling point but it began years ago and no one in the wider community did anything. Now we’re expected to about turn in the middle of a pandemic.
DB: I’ve learned about complexity. I don’t think I have anything to learn
from religion though.
YF: we can learn from entrepreneurial men and women fighting strictures now virtually redundant elsewhere. Treat us an individuals.
HG: a big thank you.
And I agree. This has been an optimistic & enlightening event.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@PNahamu seminar on forced marriage. Hearing from the authors of the paper, @YehudisFletcher & @EveSacks - acknowledging the issues in what seems to me to be a notably balanced way.
Proper qs about the extent to which external publicity & pressure can delay quiet resolution.
"We can't timetable people's freedom' (Fletcher).
If I thought quiet chats would help, albeit at the risk of sacrificing individuals, I'd find the q more difficult than I actually do.
Sacks makes interesting point that when confronted by the issue, the mainstream community says "oh, the shtetl, how lovely", rather than "wtf" (I paraphrase).
1/4 While we're on JVL people and their defence of Ken Livingstone, this is @JonathanRosenh1:
On antisemitism from Corbynistas: "We don’t know if they are members of the Labour Party. We don’t even know if they are supporters of Jeremy Corbyn. If I was the Israeli government, I
would be running all sorts of false flag operations getting people to post – & they have hordes of them in Israel doing this sort of stuff on the internet – saying things which would then discredit Jeremy Corbyn."
Whilst appearing on @Presstvuk (the official arm of the Iranian
State) with Rev Stephen Sizer (ordered off social media by the Church of England after claiming that Jews were behind 9/11), “Many Jews are fearful & feel that the Labour Party is infected with antisemitism. That’s the result of the campaign by the Board of Deputies
Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi gave evidence on behalf of Ken Livingstone at his disciplinary hearing. Here are the quotes. You probably see the difficulties & the justification for removing her from @UKLabour
If not, you need education - speak to @JewishLabour.
She said:
"I was not
remotely offended & I didn’t know what the fuss was. I probably wouldn’t have put it that way but I have myself looked at the history. I’m aware of this very controversial historical record of Zionist leaders making approaches to leaders of the Nazi party, suggesting deals. And
in fact I’m sorry to say this but I’ve got sources here to back this up, that there was a coincidence of interest between the Zionist leadership – that’s not to say every Zionist of course – but between the Zionist leadership and the Nazi party, which wished to rid German Society
EHRC thread: 1/9
In terms of the debate on social media, the report is devastating. It demolishes every defence. It upholds the accuracy of Panorama and the complaints. It directly finds a failure of leadership.
Political interference is clear. There is no basis for asserting that this was the fault of individual employees. That is patently untrue. If Karie "I'm proud" Murphy is really proud then she is proud of this.
The Party did not take responsibility for the casual antisemitism of too many of its members on social media.
And this conduct IS antisemitism - making it clear that the sealioners and gaslighters with whom so many of us have dealt for so long are bad actors.
1/16. Regrettably it appears that @barstandards has rejected both our analysis and our offer.
Analysis first: Our analysis was that pen and paper exams, whilst they might offer another chance, were ultimately unfair. The less well off you are, and the more employed you are,
the harder it is to find time to take exams. The longer the exams are delayed, the more work is required to repeat revision. We forcefully made the point that delay equalled injustice (as ever). It now appears that what @barstandards were telling us would be September will be/
October and December. Resists will not be until spring 2021.
On the plus side, we persuaded the BSB that everyone should be able to sit. Their initial view depended on an assessment of/
As the battle against Corbyn & his followers is (almost) won - the polls show 94% of @UKLabour members are behind Starmer, the EHRC report will likely say the party was institutionally antisemitic & the Party will adopt its recommendations - the issue is how Jews deal with
1/8
the fight against antisemitism going forward.
It’s time to stop attacking each other for perceived lack of support, daring to dissent or - worst of all - being a convert. I have 5 suggestions: 1. Accept there isn’t only one answer to anything but the most basic questions.
2/8
Tolerate difference & dissent. If you disagree it doesn’t mean anyone else is wrong. Disagree on the issues. Point out you’re the vast majority. Critique the approach. But bringing in extraneous issues - gender, conversion, age, religion are a no-no. Some people hate Jews,
3/8