I'm already seeing some on the right once again claiming that "the CDC" has proven that guns "save 2.5 million lives" per year.

So before we jump on that merry-go-round of bullshit, I'm going to debunk it again.
First, this 2.5 million number *doesn't* come from the CDC.

It comes from a 1992 survey by FSU criminologist Gary Kleck, who random-dialed a bunch of ppl, asked if they used a gun to defend themselves or their property in the last 4 years and extrapolated to the U.S. population.
There are a million problems with trying to measure defensive gun use this way.

First, there is no way to verify the respondents. Any of them could have fabricated an incident, named a real one that fell outside the 4 years, or even cast an aggressive gun use as a defensive one.
But even if we assume all the responses are real, Kleck included a bunch of gun uses that are PLAINLY not regular citizens fighting off crimes — he included police & soldiers who used their guns on duty, and even people who used guns to scare off animals. vacps.org/public-policy/…
So what's a better measure?

The National Crime Victimization Survey did its own study where it directly reviewed cases of property and violent crime attempts, and put the real number of defensive gun uses per year at 100,000. hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-t…
And keep in mind — the number of these crimes that would have ended in death had the victim not been armed is unknowable, but it's certainly a tiny fraction of that total 100,000. After all, homicides are only about 1.3% of all violent crimes per year. statista.com/topics/1750/vi…
If we assume prevented homicides are about that same percent within these incidents, then defensive gun use probably saves about 1,000-2,000 people a year.

Versus about 14,000 gun homicides and 24,000 gun suicides a year. cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/h… cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/s…
This tracks with the overwhelming body of research showing that people who own guns are more likely to be shot than people who don't — and that states with more gun ownership, all else equal, have higher rates of death. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… vpc.org/press/states-w…
Ultimately, the gun lobby's denial of the public health crisis caused by their product is rife with all the same sleazy, pseudoscientific obfuscation the tobacco industry did to deny smoking causes lung cancer, or oil companies did to deny CO2 causes climate change.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Chapman

Matthew Chapman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fawfulfan

21 Mar
It's not really an endorsement of communism, though, to say that zero leaders who have ever sought to create a communist society have ever actually created one.
If I were to tell you that being able to fly is a great idea and everyone who jumped off a building and splatted on the pavement just never achieved it, that's not an endorsement of jumping off buildings.
Similarly, no matter how good a concept it is for humanity to transcend the need for states and classes, if communism the political theory never actually gets us there, at some point that is on the theory, not just on every individual political leader who "messed it up."
Read 4 tweets
16 Mar
She's right. Antifa is not an organization, it's an ideology — literally, the ideology of fighting the far right.

It doesn't make sense to talk about antifa as if it's a specific political party or activist group, because it isn't — it's just a thing that people believe.
The phrase "antifa organized a protest" makes about as much sense as saying "pro-life organized a protest."

Sure, individuals and groups who oppose abortion could organize a protest. But pro-life itself can't organize anything. It's just an idea — it doesn't have agency.
Republicans certainly seemed to get this whenever Tea Party activists attacked members of Congress or made terroristic threats. Oh, the Tea Party is just a grassroots belief in small government, we aren't responsible if a few crazies with Gadsden flags behave like criminals.
Read 4 tweets
7 Mar
Road trip day!

Driving to Portland, Oregon for a weeklong anniversary vacation with @fawfulfanswife.
Just made it to Susanville. Pulling over at the Diamond Mountain Casino for a quick rest stop and gas up.
Hello Oregon!

41 states down. 9 to go.
Read 9 tweets
4 Mar
NYC politicians have a comically bad understanding of Puerto Rican politics, because most Boricuas in NYC are descended from people who moved from the island during a time when there was a strong independence movement.
The independence movement tries to guilt and shame liberals into thinking they are the popular will. But the truth is, in the last 40 years independence has never polled over 6%. puertoricoreport.com/how-popular-is…

To put that in perspective, 26% of Texans wanted independence in 2016.
The idea that statehood is a "far-right" position is utter nonsense. Yes, Republican-affiliated politicians in PR support statehood, but so do Democratic-affiliated ones, including Gov. Pedro Pierluisi, who was explicitly elected on a statehood platform.
Read 8 tweets
28 Feb
Going back and looking at it now, it's almost offensive how bad Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam was.
Seriously, like, how do you manage to create a crossover between Mario & Luigi and Paper Mario and provide ZERO fanservice to players from either series?
There's no plot. There's no callbacks or references to anything from either series. The battle mechanics aren't fun. The exploration isn't fun. It doesn't even feel like an RPG, it feels like a bunch of Toad-rescuing minigames with an overworld.
Read 9 tweets
26 Feb
Hey, lady, news flash: "dumb Blacks" KNOW the long history of pre-CRA Southern Dems' friendliness with the KKK and hostility to civil rights.

That's why, for decades, they've worked their way up into leadership positions in the party and reshaped it to center their interests.
This is what everyone who pushes this stupid "plantation" talking point fails to understand.

Black people don't just vote for the Democratic Party. Black people *are* the Democratic Party. They hold key offices. They decide the outcome of our primaries. They write our platform.
Now, does every Black voter think and act the same? Of course not. And if Black conservatives want to argue, we have a right not to have our beliefs profiled because of our race, that's completely fair!

But to claim the majority of Black voters were bought off, instead of...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!