1/
I watched this so you don't have to.
A thread:
I watched this so you don't have to.
A thread:
https://twitter.com/PSQuitSmoking/status/1375176219336015873
2/
This got off to an extremely weak start. The middle of this century stuff is a complete cop-out, and it completely ignores the fact that much is known already.
It did improve, however.
clivebates.com/vaping-tobacco…
This got off to an extremely weak start. The middle of this century stuff is a complete cop-out, and it completely ignores the fact that much is known already.
It did improve, however.
clivebates.com/vaping-tobacco…
3/
Khara seemed to have a good handle of the state of the evidence most of the time. To me, the notion that e-cigarettes should only be a last resort looks unethical though.
Underrated point: most conclusions about vaping are based on what's known about smoking. Bad idea imo.
Khara seemed to have a good handle of the state of the evidence most of the time. To me, the notion that e-cigarettes should only be a last resort looks unethical though.
Underrated point: most conclusions about vaping are based on what's known about smoking. Bad idea imo.
4/
Zawertailo appears to be incapable of telling the difference between high quality research (e.g. Hajek) and utter junk (e.g. diacetyl).
Her comments on the intentionally misleadingly-named EVALI were good, though.
Zawertailo appears to be incapable of telling the difference between high quality research (e.g. Hajek) and utter junk (e.g. diacetyl).
Her comments on the intentionally misleadingly-named EVALI were good, though.
5/
Selby has a way of sounding 100% reasonable and then drifting off into anti-scientific fringe-land.
His use of the word "addictive" was too often inappropriate.
He has a bad habit of assuming that if he doesn't know something, then nobody knows. It's not always true.
Selby has a way of sounding 100% reasonable and then drifting off into anti-scientific fringe-land.
His use of the word "addictive" was too often inappropriate.
He has a bad habit of assuming that if he doesn't know something, then nobody knows. It's not always true.
6/
Forgot to mention:
It was suggested that 2 decades of use was enough to know the health effects of vaping. That time will arrive this decade, not in the middle of this century.
Forgot to mention:
It was suggested that 2 decades of use was enough to know the health effects of vaping. That time will arrive this decade, not in the middle of this century.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
