Policing in Britain has traditionally been by consent. Attacking peaceful (if disruptive) protests crosses a line into policing by force.
That this approach began in multiple police forces simultaneously right as the bill went to the vote, suggests it's new UK wide strategy.
1/
If it is a new UK wide strategy the only person who can be directing it, is Patel, as Home Sec.
Bristol didn't fall in line on the correct day (Fri 12 March- the Clapham vigil). Sussex did and the Met did, that's why their protests went sour. Bristol didn't right away.
2/
Here is a very senior officer at Avon & Somerset police, just coincidentally dropping by, to pet the lovely horsies, at 4pm today.
Today's police actions were purely responsive, yep yep, not pre-planned in person, this afternoon, and set up, to make a point, nope nope.
3/
It's sad to see police forces, who for the last 20 years have been trying to shed the moniker force, in favour of the more consent-based service, turn to the dark side quite so quickly.
Sad because it's the dark side.
Also because it's absolutely suicidal of them...
4/
Suicidal because once consent is destroyed, what you have is brute force and perpetual escalation. You no longer have the intelligent policing Britain prides itself on, you have a domestic military unit.
All the clever part of policing, everything they do TV shows on, dies.
5/
Chief constables stupid enough not to see this are also entirely vulnerable to getting thrown under a bus by Patel whensoever the whim takes her. As she already has, to Cressida Dick.
Then what? New, even more loyal, even less intelligent appointees will replace them.
6/
We are sliding, at a startling rate, headlong into fascism.
Without the chiefs of police willing facilitation, a fascist takeover would be impossible to complete.
You'd imagine a seasoned investigator would question whatever carrot or stick was presented by the Home Office?
7/
The lack of foresight and enquiry being demonstrated, right from the top of British police forces, is fuelling a breakdown of trust reaching parts of society who'd never previously have considered deviating from total faith.
It's galling to watch Britain's pillars fall.
8/
I have been telling you, that this bill was the pivot where the country tips from being right-wing, into something truly unsavoury, for longer than this bill even existed. Since it was still notes in a desk drawer somewhere.
The police are stupidly, leaning into the drop.
9/
If the chief constables don't drop the scales from their eyes, and revert to policing with a brain, we are heading for a civil unrest that they won't be able to quell, just exacerbate, which will run and run and run.
And also personal ruin and the destruction of the job.
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I realised this last night but wanted to leave it to rule out that it was simply a matter of the post not being up long enough.
It's potentially linked to how many likes and shares, as the post with the bot/sock attention was 10x more popular, but I don't think it's that.
2/?
What you have to realise is sock puppet activity may look like random bellends sounding off, but it's meant to. What sock puppet activity is, is organised campaigning to skew natural discourse and debate online, to interject more of a set perspective.
OMG. Little One just filled in the gaps on a story we half knew...
Another child said he wanted to be a Nazi. LO smacked him and stamped on his foot. LO served a punishment for this crime (time out), and has just described the punishment as "worth it". LO has no regrets.
👀
LO said LO challenged the boy, and said Nazis were mass killers in ways too horrible to even explain and if the boy wants to be a Nazi he's an idiot.
The boy did not repent.
LO flashed angry and then slapped him and stamped on him.
The boy appears to have been treated with a cold compress. LO's teacher was very unhappy with LO for hitting but didn't defend being a Nazi (because that's obviously indefensible), however you aren't allowed to do that, so LO served time... (In time out).
Can't sleep. Also my child RN isn't sleeping, which means I must be watchful.
RN is a KS2 child (older end of primary school) who has entirely crumbled during this pandemic.
I still support lockdown.
Here's why the Kids Mental Health argument against lockdown is nonsense:
1/
First, let's establish I know what I am talking about.
RN stands for Roadside Naughtiest because prior to Covid happening, RN was happy, fun, lively, kind, brave, thoughtful, popular and always up to something (not always within the rules).
Cheeky RN was a joy to know.
2/
Lockdown happened and my baby fell apart. Really, really fell apart. The difference was night and day.
It turns out RN may have ADHD always, but a solid routine & cosy space within the van we lived in, and vast amounts of outdoor excercise every single day, managed it well.
3/
I have heard of many a senseless, spiteful, pointless act of downright scumbaggery, but today's revelation takes the fucking cake - literally. Takes ALL the food right off the tables of people who have actual nothing!
SOMEONE IS SYSTEMICALLY TARGETING @HumansMCR FOODBANK
1/
First off here's a news story. But it's actually fucking WORSE than it even looks here.
It's actually happened THREE times in succession now, the first day some CCTV went up that could have helped protect them, the bastards smashed that too.
Reflecting on it, some things spring out for me, so I thought I would do what I do, and make a little thread about it...
1/
Apparently, almost no one in the media even went to a normal state school, let alone has personal experience of deprivation. That lack of experience is a massive factor in how the narrative is shaped. They honestly, truly, can not and do not understand us, or even know us.
2/
The situation in the nation's corporate boardrooms and in the corridors of power aren't much different. Exceptions of course exist, but those individuals seem to be rarities.
Fair to say those groups don't know us either and for the most part they aren't trying to.
3/
So if you missed it last night, let me fill you in.
It transpires that even long since Chartwells knew, beyond doubt, that this was their "hamper", and even after they started "apologising" to me in private, they cast doubt on my integrity where they thought I wouldn't see.
1/
Well of course I did see, didn't I.
So to be abundantly clear:
1. I have written proof it was a TEN day parcel. @BylineTimes published it. Other outlets saw it for due diligence.
2. It was presented in a basic, not very strong, white carrier bag.
2/
3. Chartwells knew that it was their parcel and that the photo was entirely accurate. Chartwells knew my school early last week and they were able to confirm the incident through their own staffing chains. How do I know? They told me.
3/