There are many desirable steps to improve racial equity that can be undertaken at the local level: e.g. stopping anti black police violence, ending discrimination in the allocation of city contracts, or producing fair access to housing. But these are not reparations.
These local actions will help, using Malcolm X’s metaphor, pull the knife out, but they won’t heal the wound caused by the blow. Healing the wound demands compensation for the damage caused by the blow. That’s reparations.
Mislabeling local steps taken to reverse unjust practices as reparations gives the false impression that the wound is being healed. But state and local governments with their combined $3.1 trillion budgets can’t meet a debt running upwards of $14 trillion. #pu
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ 6 I would prefer not to invest my time in responding to such shoddy research as the so-called Harvard “disinformation” study, but I’ve received so many comments and requests, I’m compelled to do so.
2/6 A central problem is the lack of clarity over whom was identified as the “voices” of ADOS. The report ultimately reads like an extension of the old “Russian bots” smear campaign against ADOS.A shabby process of determining whose Tweets are evaluated produced a desired result.
1/4 As a number of us anticipated black folk are being recruited excessively as subjects for coronavirus vaccine clinical trials, including college presidents at Xavier and Dillard imploring their students to join trials. Other med centers are targeting the local black community.
2/4 I feared that the fact that we are disproportionately affected by the disease (3 times the mortality rates of other groups) would become the rationale for encouraging us to disproportionately be the guinea pigs for previously untested vaccines.
3/4 These are not trials for a curative medication that, understandably, might be given to folk who are suffering severe symptoms from the disease. These are tests of candidate vaccines intended to prevent infection, and there are at least two dangers:
4. UBI is more likely to affect inequality adversely. If you give Bill Gates and "Bill the plumber" the same $12K, the former could save it all leading to a marginal increase in wealth while the latter is more likely to need to spend most of it, w little effect on their wealth.
5. The federal job guarantee puts pressure on the private sector to step up its game and improve job quality (pay, benefits, and safety). The UBI as a stand alone de facto will subsidize bad jobs. @StephanieKelton@ptcherneva
6. Yang says his UBI as "bureaucratically efficient" since it will replace a host of social programs. This is without ensuring nonpoverty incomes for all. The federal job guarantee is assures the lowest paid employee gets above poverty wages. @StephanieKelton@ptcherneva