new development in seattle v. new development in stuttgart
spot the differences
seattle: 1. no sense of community 2. no private outdoor space not observable by neighbors 3. auto-oriented despite 1 block from decent transit 4. not accessible 5. not affordable 6. no diversity in unit size or type 7. poor design 8. setbacks and driveway make for sh*t urbanism
seattle (cont'd) 9. built to bare minimum 10. poor sound protection 11. few to no eyes on the street 12. no place for kids to play 13. little privacy 14. virtually no open space on site
stuttgart: 1. baugruppe 2. elevator w/ dedicated barrier-free units 3. diversity in unit size/affordability 4. community room doubles as guest suite 5. private outdoor space not looking at adj. 6. mass timber - better sound protection 7. almost passivhaus 8. not auto-centric
STR (cont'd) 9. no GD setbacks 10. decent design 11. better space utilization (1 stair v. 1/unit) 12. larger, cohesive planned development 13. playground in development, car-free streets for kiddos/lounging 14. sun protection! 15. 3-pane windows 16. did i mention a baugruppe?
these were built at the exact same time.
the level of technology, resiliency and durability in the stuttgart development, far exceeds that of seattle's.
the 11-unit maxacht baugruppe is designed by architekturagentur. not a lot of common space for a baugruppe but it is pretty stunning and a personal fave architekturagentur.de/geplant-gebaut…
if you want to know more about baugruppen - collectively developed urban housing - i gave a talk at @ignitesea 4 years ago that summarizes it...
and wrote a series on baugruppen for @UrbanistOrg a few years earlier...
our brand new almost passivhaus 3 BR maisonette in a 4-plex was 1/3 rent of townhouse in seattle.
daycare was 1/12th cost v. seattle
dining out w/ tip and drinks was half as much or less.
travel: cheap, green and easy v. seattle
can't take a train to go skiing in seattle. hell you can barely take a train to get to vancouver BC. and it's slow, very infrequent and sometimes cancelled.
they're not made in the US. they're manufactured in places notorious for conservative industries, but that are adopting stringent energy codes - like germany, austria.
i've been thinking a lot about CLT floors of late.
i've always struggled a bit with how we do it here - thin floor plates w/ CLT panels, and it hit me in a discussion w. hundegger's wolfgang piatke - the US puts CLT in floors, the EU puts CLT in walls
and it's not just that we put CLT in floors - we also do it wrong.
in the US, nearly everyone is trying to do the thinnest floor plate they can w/ CLT. they do this by adding a layer of acoustic insulation and a concrete or gypcrete topping.
this sets up a couple of issues
1. the approach is not the best from an acoustic standpoint. yes, it can meet the bare minimum of the code, but performance isn't ideal.
we're beyond point of 4plexes in single family zones as a means towards affordable housing.
that juncture was in late 70s, when city looked at legalizing missing middle affordable housing in seattle's vast single family zoned landscape. homeowners got that killed. or 90s UV plan
per zillow, median single family home value in seattle today exceeds $950k, is expected to increase substantially over the next year.
this means the land costs *alone* for a 4plex will be almost $250k.
seattle's abhorrent land policies have only exacerbated the housing crisis
if we take a very aggressive soft + hard cost (minus land) of $350/sf for a 1,000 sf unit, then we're at $600k per unit.
this is unaffordable for those under 100% AMI without a very sizeable down payment. especially if the city refuses to adjust occupancy limits
vallastaden is a new green, mixed use urban development in the swedish city of linkoping, that was developed as an urban living expo - w/ diverse housing types and ownership models