This graph has been used to claim that virtually all of humanity, for all of history, was destitute until the 19th century, when colonialism and capitalism came to the rescue. But, according to new research, the long-term trend is empirically baseless. jasonhickel.org/blog/2021/3/28…
In Annual Review of Economics, Allen argues that high extreme poverty rates in the 20th century are not a baseline state but a modern phenomenon, induced by colonialism. In late colonial Asia, extreme poverty was driven to levels higher than under 13th century serfdom.
The story of extreme poverty is not a one-way street. Extreme poverty likely increased during periods of enclosure and colonization, before finally declining with the rise of labour movements, democracy and decolonization.
Here is Allen's article. It's behind a paywall, unfortunately, but I've summarized the main points in the blog above. annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114…
This shouldn't come as a surprise. We know that imperialism caused demographic collapse in Latin America, serial famines in India, mass dispossession in Africa, a collapse of wages in China, etc. The notion that imperialism reduced extreme poverty is wild on the face of it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We can recover from this economic crisis *without* chasing growth. A progressive public job guarantee can help get us there, while reducing ecological impact at the same time. My latest for Foreign Policy: foreignpolicy.com/2021/02/23/sti…
Rich countries do not need economic growth in order to create employment and ensure good livelihoods for all. They can do it directly, without any growth at all.
"Trying to grow the economy to create jobs is effectively make-work. Almost by definition, jobs created this way are in industries we don’t really need to expand, and expanding them, in turn, creates pressures for needless consumption. A job guarantee program does the opposite."
It is possible (indeed, necessary) for the USA to scale down aggregate resource and energy use while at the *same time* ending hunger and poverty, and providing universal healthcare for all. The notion that the US needs *more* resource and energy throughput to do this is absurd.
For perspective: the USA uses 66 billion GJ of final energy and 11 billion tons of materials per year. If the whole world consumed at that rate, global energy use would quadruple and global resource use would nearly triple. This is not compatible with a habitable planet.
Per capita energy use in the USA is 200 GJ. That's at least 10x more than is necessary to deliver high levels of well-being for all, plus universal public healthcare, education, transportation, computing, housing, healthy food, insulin, etc. Zero poverty and hunger.
This is devastating news. Global South countries have been fighting for the right to manufacture and import affordable versions of the covid vaccines. A few hours ago, the USA, UK and European Union joined forces to block them at the WTO. The West is indefensible.
Here's a report. "WTO fails to reach agreement" is a nice euphemism for "Colonial power prevails at the WTO". law360.com/lifesciences/a…
This is wild: "The US Chamber of Commerce warned the WTO's director-general not to 'distract' herself with proposals to suspend intellectual property rules in order to distribute COVID-19 vaccines around the world." law360.com/articles/13605…
The notion that wealthy countries have "achieved" growth while poor countries "haven't" erases both colonial history and neo-colonial forms of power. In reality the former have grown rich by exploiting the latter, and they continue to do so.
The West's economic rise depended on silver and gold plundered from the Andes; cotton and sugar grown by enslaved Africans on land stolen from Indigenous Americans; plus rubber, grain, timber etc appropriated from Africa, India and other colonized territories.
After independence, governments across the South focused on progressive economic reforms to boost wages, public services and domestic industries. These efforts were quashed and reversed by structural adjustment programs imposed by the World Bank and the IMF from the 1980s onward.
I really enjoyed this discussion with @sjmmcd. It gave us a chance to reflect on degrowth beyond the usual introductory ideas. See what you think: the-trouble.com/content/2021/2…
"Degrowth adds an anti-imperialist ethic to ecosocialism. The call for degrowth in the global North is not just about ecology. It is also a call for decolonization in the global South. Ecosocialism without anti-imperialism is not an ecosocialism worth having."
"It was once thought that we shouldn’t use the word degrowth, for fear of turning people off. I’ve found the opposite; people find it intuitive and refreshing. It makes no sense to patronize people. Appeal to their intellect, their humanity, their sense of care and solidarity."
The People's Agreement of Cochabamba is the single most powerful, holistic statement on climate that I am aware of. Read it, assign it to your students, send it to your politicians, and make sure it's on the table at any citizens assembly: pwccc.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/peo…
"Humanity confronts a great dilemma: to continue on the path of capitalism, depredation, and death, or to choose the path of harmony with nature and respect for life."
"It is imperative that we forge a new system that restores harmony with nature and among human beings. And in order for there to be balance with nature, there must first be equity among human beings."