IT'S GRAPH O'CLOCK, CHILDREN!

Gather 'round for a graph of the "normieficiation" of QAnon (what a GREAT phrase, btw!).

By "normiefication," the authors mean: the spread of QAnon from a small, 4chan-savvy audience to the wider Internet.

Next: analysis!
firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/…
As you can see on the FULL graph (click in to expand, naturally), there was a tiny bit of Q-related content leaking onto the wider Internet almost from the start.

Reddit content was at first largely confined to r/conspiracy, and there were a few YouTubers covering Q early on.
So at the VERY beginning -- the period I'm mostly concerned with -- Q was largely a 4chan phenomenon. The data makes it *look* like YouTube, rather than Reddit, was the key driver of QAnon reaching a wider audience.

This is possible, but we don't have info on *views.*
We also don't have data from Twitter or FB, BTW (and the data from 8chan is incomplete -- it's true that Q went on a bit of a posting hiatus around the time they show roughly 0 Q-related activity on 8chan, but I PROMISE discussion was not 0 posts per day).
So this data doesn't tell the FULL story of how we got here.

But the big-picture takeaway is: by the time Q moved to 8chan, on 11/25/17, the center of gravity of the QAnon movement may already have shifted to Reddit and YouTube.

That's *really* interesting! Thanks, authors.😃

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Q Origins Project

The Q Origins Project Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @QOrigins

28 Mar
Somehow I had already forgotten that, IN MID-FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR,

the VERY conservative American Enterprise Institute found 29% of white evangelicals said it was "completely" or "mostly" accurate that Trump was fighting a cabal of pedophile Dems. 🙃🙃

religionnews.com/2021/02/11/sur…
The article is worth a read, BTW, because it has really interesting breakdowns on prevalence of QAnon belief by race and religion.
Oh! I should add -- this survey may actually UNDER-report the prevalence of that belief, since at least one other reputable survey found approximately 50% of Republicans believing that top Democrats are involved in child-sex-trafficking rings.

So: 🙃🙃🙃
Read 4 tweets
27 Mar
Here @levithewilson raises an interesting point -- and wouldn't you know it? It lets me segue into another piece by @Dappergander!

Gander's piece on the "QAnon Sales Funnel" is the OTHER essential piece on how QAnon recruiting works.

patreon.com/posts/qanon-sa…
Now... y'all know what a funnel is, right? Just in case you don't, here you go: it's a device that starts off broad at the top and narrows down to a tiiiiny little nozzle.

Radicalization is a funnel -- many are called, as it were, but few are chosen.

So is Anon.
Anyone who's curious enough to Google QAnon or watch one of their recruitment videos or what-have-you has entered the sales funnel.

But wait, why summarize? I can let Gander take it from here:
Read 13 tweets
27 Mar
I've been around the Internet for long enough to realize most people look at *anything* that smells like drama and go "Fuck that, I'm out."

But there's a difference between drama & saying "This guy doesn't know what he's talking about."

That is the deal w/@davetroy.
Troy has written a 6-part Medium series on "the big history behind January 6th."

You can read them in full at the link below.

Before I get into *why I think he's wrong*, here's what he gets right:

the far right *is* transnational now. This is true!

davetroy.medium.com
And more conventional right-wingers do share ideological sympathies with their fellows in other countries.

I wouldn't say they COOPERATE much, because right-wingers who participate in electoral politics are going to be pretty well focused *on those electoral politics.*
Read 27 tweets
27 Mar
This is the thread I was flaggin' as, y'know, A Thing To Watch As It Develops.

I'm going to be VERY interested to compare what Seth wrote to what I, as a young conservative MYSELF, would have written.

Bc Seth comes from a Christian Identity background and I don't, and yet... 👀
UPDATE: Oh boy. Seth's thread was an EDUCATION for me and, I think, will be one for you too.

Only gonna make one point because it's midnight, but... re: 👇, I absorbed a secularized version of this and STILL had a lotta cognitive dissonance abt America's past.
I can't IMAGINE how hard it would have been to stop doing... ::gestures:: all the whataboutism and deflection and "well, was it really so bad"-ness...

if I had believed that all of the atrocities were ordained by God to give America to white people, which was Seth's background.
Read 4 tweets
27 Mar
Earlier today, I ran a poll asking how much exposure all y'all had to conspiracy-theory writings.

Turns out a bunch of you, even THOUGH you're steeped in the material, are like, "SHOW ME THEIR TRICKS."

But I can't *possibly* do better than Gander. Here:

patreon.com/posts/why-wont…
I know most folks don't click links, so let me give you a brief summary. First, we've all had this EXPERIENCE, right? A Q person dances around questions endlessly, refuses to state their beliefs, and says "do your own research."

So Gander asks: what's the FUNCTION of that reply?
Well, almost certainly the Q believer has a *bunch* of Q-related beliefs that you'd reject out of hand. They want to pill you, and they know the interaction just... WILL NOT GO in that direction if they come right out and say what they believe.

You'll mock 'em and bounce, right?
Read 7 tweets
27 Mar
I've long talked about how Q's North Korea storyline is the weirdest thing about him. Most of Q's conspiracy theories are generic, but "The CIA runs North Korea?"

That's OUT there.

Today I learned about a far-right podcaster who did an episode in April 2017 claiming thaaat:
Does that mean *for sure* that Q stole his claim from this guy? No.

Am I gonna spend a bunch of time researching it? No; I have other stuff to do and, at a cursory glance, there's very little meat on these bones. Not much to analyze.

But here's what I do have.
Really the most notable thing about his video is that, though the title currently says "(satire)," no one in the comments took it as satirical. Reception to his claim was, overall, warm but mixed.

On Twitter, incidentally, he WAS aware that Q was promoting his ideas:
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!