It is impossible to separate the history of capitalism from colonialism and the European slave trade. They are co-extensive. Colonialism was the mechanism by which most of the world was roped into the Europe-centered capitalist economy. We need to face up to this fact.
We like to think that capitalism is about "markets". But markets existed for thousands of years before capitalism. The history of capitalism is defined not by markets but by appropriation.
This can be difficult for people in the global North to grasp. But for most of the global South, for the better part of 500 years, the encounter with capitalism was experienced as invasion, genocide, enslavement and dispossession.
The argument about markets vs appropriation is demonstrated brilliantly, by the way, by Patel & Moore in "A history of the world in seven cheap things", which I highly recommend: versobooks.com/books/3139-a-h…
And, as Varoufakis has argued, we can have markets without capitalism, for an economy that's organized around human well-being rather than around elite appropriation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm excited to announce the new update of the Sustainable Development Index. Costa Rica tops the list this time, with a life expectancy over 80 (!) and low levels of emissions and resource use. sustainabledevelopmentindex.org
A few notable developments since the 2015 data:
1. The number of countries reaching over 0.8 (“very high”) has increased from 8 to 12.
2. Bolivia is a standout performer, with a significant improvement in life expectancy (2.7 years) lifting it into the top 20.
3. Côte d'Ivoire achieved the biggest jump in SDI, driven by a significant improvement in life expectancy (4.7 years).
4. Cuba has moved from 1st to 9th place, as a change in the World Bank’s methodology for estimating Cuba’s PPP income led to a significant downward revision.
This graph has been used to claim that virtually all of humanity, for all of history, was destitute until the 19th century, when colonialism and capitalism came to the rescue. But, according to new research, the long-term trend is empirically baseless. jasonhickel.org/blog/2021/3/28…
In Annual Review of Economics, Allen argues that high extreme poverty rates in the 20th century are not a baseline state but a modern phenomenon, induced by colonialism. In late colonial Asia, extreme poverty was driven to levels higher than under 13th century serfdom.
The story of extreme poverty is not a one-way street. Extreme poverty likely increased during periods of enclosure and colonization, before finally declining with the rise of labour movements, democracy and decolonization.
We can recover from this economic crisis *without* chasing growth. A progressive public job guarantee can help get us there, while reducing ecological impact at the same time. My latest for Foreign Policy: foreignpolicy.com/2021/02/23/sti…
Rich countries do not need economic growth in order to create employment and ensure good livelihoods for all. They can do it directly, without any growth at all.
"Trying to grow the economy to create jobs is effectively make-work. Almost by definition, jobs created this way are in industries we don’t really need to expand, and expanding them, in turn, creates pressures for needless consumption. A job guarantee program does the opposite."
It is possible (indeed, necessary) for the USA to scale down aggregate resource and energy use while at the *same time* ending hunger and poverty, and providing universal healthcare for all. The notion that the US needs *more* resource and energy throughput to do this is absurd.
For perspective: the USA uses 66 billion GJ of final energy and 11 billion tons of materials per year. If the whole world consumed at that rate, global energy use would quadruple and global resource use would nearly triple. This is not compatible with a habitable planet.
Per capita energy use in the USA is 200 GJ. That's at least 10x more than is necessary to deliver high levels of well-being for all, plus universal public healthcare, education, transportation, computing, housing, healthy food, insulin, etc. Zero poverty and hunger.
This is devastating news. Global South countries have been fighting for the right to manufacture and import affordable versions of the covid vaccines. A few hours ago, the USA, UK and European Union joined forces to block them at the WTO. The West is indefensible.
Here's a report. "WTO fails to reach agreement" is a nice euphemism for "Colonial power prevails at the WTO". law360.com/lifesciences/a…
This is wild: "The US Chamber of Commerce warned the WTO's director-general not to 'distract' herself with proposals to suspend intellectual property rules in order to distribute COVID-19 vaccines around the world." law360.com/articles/13605…
The notion that wealthy countries have "achieved" growth while poor countries "haven't" erases both colonial history and neo-colonial forms of power. In reality the former have grown rich by exploiting the latter, and they continue to do so.
The West's economic rise depended on silver and gold plundered from the Andes; cotton and sugar grown by enslaved Africans on land stolen from Indigenous Americans; plus rubber, grain, timber etc appropriated from Africa, India and other colonized territories.
After independence, governments across the South focused on progressive economic reforms to boost wages, public services and domestic industries. These efforts were quashed and reversed by structural adjustment programs imposed by the World Bank and the IMF from the 1980s onward.