My unpopular opinion is that vaccine passports are fine so long as the government isn’t the one requiring them for anything.
If the trade off is the vaccine passport for things like entirely full sports stadiums and entirely packed bars, I think it’s worth it.
Another benefit that surely will not pacify the haters is that it would actually, you know, create an incentive to get the vaccine (something govt keeps refusing to do).
Lots of places wouldn’t have any incentive to have a vaccine passport for people shopping and I think, by and large, companies respond to incentives.
Amazon isn’t going to stop shipping your packages that they’ve shipped throughout the pandemic.
Me looking at lefty Twitter with my takes about benevolent government, the common good and stakeholder capitalism.
Also, the places that would actually have this are the ones who, alternatively, would be shut. Communities in Texas can be open. Those places aren’t going to take steps backward with a vaccine passports. But places that aren’t open - like Austin - could become increasingly open.
At least I warned you guys that this was an unpopular take.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tomorrow will be 3 weeks since Texas lifted it’s mask mandate. Coronavirus cases have been steadily declining since, w/ yesterday the 18th day in a row of decreases.
But you may remember the left & the media promised the reverse would happen. And I’ve got receipts.⤵️
The only place to start this thread is with @JoeBiden, whom you may remember referred to Texas’s opening up as “Neanderthal thinking.”
Perhaps the White House would like to follow up about why?
Other governors also took shots. Here’s @GavinNewsom, whose decision to keep his state shut down cost the state 52,000 jobs.
My thoughts on the Covid vaccine are the same as vaccines pre-Covid: not only is it good and you should take it but I’m okay with you facing consequences if you refuse, just like if you won’t pay your taxes or walk your dog on a leash or drive the speed limit or whatever.
I know the whole anti-libertarian thing is somewhat of a bit at this point but also I think the general worldview that undergirds it is bad and wrong.
Anyway, I have long been anti-anti-vaxxer and I continue to be despite (or maybe because of) recent events.
Has anyone even pretended to make the case that there is a need for this? That conditions are so bad that we need to do an unprecedented thing for a **fourth** time? Or are we beyond that?
One of two things is true:
Either the government can give out a lot of money directly to people without consequences, or there are serious consequences to giving out “free” money to people.
Until recently, we all agreed it was the latter (even the first stimulus!)
I think the idea that “lockdowns saved lives” doesn’t make sense in pretty straightforward ways that we don’t seem to be talking about enough.
(1/12)
The most prominent US study (story on it linked below) suggests that lockdowns helped avoid 60 million coronavirus cases. Otherwise, we’d have about triple the number of confirmed cases we have now.
To make things simple and round, let’s assume that 3x cases = 3x deaths. This overstates the current mortality rate of COVID (esp accounting for true caseloads vs. positive tests) but accounts for some inexact pressure on hospitals and other systems.
Guys. People lost their minds when Trump walked slowly down a ramp one time.
I don’t think the Biden stair stumble stuff should matter. But boy did the media set one hell of a precedent about presidential walking patterns.
And if you’ve forgotten, read on ⤵️
Remember this very earnest and concerned @nytimes story (and video!)? Suggesting his “halting walk” “raises new health questions”??
I wonder if we’ll hear about how Biden is the oldest president when (if?) his stair story hits print.
And people picked this story up. This was a whole news cycle! Here’s @kylegriffin1 and @jaketapper sharing this story as if it were something that mattered.