Kaz Okanoya has done extensive work documenting differences between the songs of the domesticated Bengalese finch and the songs of its wild relative, the white-dumped munia.
Various measures point to increased variability and 'complexity' in the song of the Bengalese finch.
We built on work @Thomas_ORourke and I did showing that the glutamate neurotransmitter system is disproportionately targeted in the evolution of domesticates: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
And we zoomed in on the role of glutamate in the regulation of stress responses and aggressive behaviors that are attenuated under domestication; we focused on the way glutamate controls dopamine activity in neural circuits crucial for vocal learning (key: striatum)
Attenuated glutamatergic signaling impacts the dorsal and ventral striatum differently (reducing dopaminergic signaling in the former, but boosting it in the latter), and we show how this could lead to increased innovation and variability in vocal production abilities.
What I like most about the account is the generic nature of these effects (nothing really specific to vocal learning), and also the implications it has to understand certain disorders like Tourette syndrome.
There is no single ‘magic’ bullet in evolution, and this proposal is to be understood in a broader context (see Box 4 of our paper). E.g, this work complements work I did with @Constantinatheo & @erichjarvis on oxytocin and its role in vocal learning: royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
The paper adds a neural circuit perspective to the very insightful discussion by J. Thomas & @SimonKirby about how (self)domestication could have impacted the evolution of our language capacity, with important roles for reward & motivation (thx Simon!) link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Our proposal also opens up new avenues of research (for me, at least), mentioned in the conclusion: e.g. how social learning & social organisation shape grammar, touching on important themes @Limor_Raviv has shed new light on in her PhD thesis: repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/21…
In closing I want to thank the three thoughtful reviewers, and TiCS editor @LindseyDrayton for the care with which she went over our text, making sure it is written in a way hopefully many readers will find accessible. Thanks above all to all my co-authors.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We decided to take a closer look at the the four major regions of the human genome depleted of Neanderthal introgression presented in Chen et al (overlapping with those identified in previous work by @melanoidin) sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Looking at the brain expression of genes found in these regions, compared to other regions, we found the highest transcriptomic divergence in the cerebellum, the striatum & the prenatal thalamus (intriguing, given the expression profile of #FOXP2, found in one of these regions)
We find evidence for very early mutations impacting the facial phenotype, and much more recent molecular events linked to specific brain regions such as the cerebellum or the precuneus. 2/
I enjoyed working on this with my students @AGMAndirko & @juanandres_mp in otherwise difficult circumstances (lockdowns). They are terrific researchers. I am thankful for the opportunity to work again with friends @MKuhlwilm@polvere7@gtesta72, the best part of the job, IMO. 3/
Beautiful work from J. Wysocka's lab out in @CellStemCell: Loss of Extreme Long-Range Enhancers in Human Neural Crest Drives a Craniofacial Disorder (h/t @polvere7) [Thread 1/] cell.com/cell-stem-cell…
The study shows how mandible development is sensitive to perturbation of SOX9 gene dosage 2/
"even such a slight reduction in Sox9 gene dosage results in measurable changes in lower jaw shape and reduction in postnatal growth" 3/
Very cool comparative cognition study (h/t @Limor_Raviv) making “the case for the universality of the sequence organization observable in informal human conversational interaction” 1/
My favorite part comes at the end, where the authors note “one of the most basic units of human social interaction, ..., has apparent homologs in the social interaction of nonhuman primates” but 2/
they find “the more elaborate structures that occur in human interaction” lacking in our closest living relatives. Why? “non-human primates appear to be limited in their ability to learn and represent the hierarchical structure of sequences” 3/
Enjoyed reading @rcbregman's new book "Humankind"; a good companion to R. Wrangham's "Goodness Paradox" and @bharedogguy & @bonobohandshake's forthcoming "Survival of the Friendliest". 1/