What brings this day home to me is Dr. David Adelberg. He was a 31-year-old surgical intern at GWU on March 30, 1981.
1/x
When Reagan got to the ER, doctors discovered he had been shot (it was a lucky strike -- the bullet ricocheted off the back quarter panel of the limo, flattened into a dime and hit Reagan edgewise under the left arm pit). Took some time to find the wound. 2/x
The docs inserted a chest tube to drain the president's left chest (it was filled with blood from internal bleeding). It flowed for 30 minutes or so. The president wouldn't stop bleeding. The 70-year-old #potus would lose more than half his blood. 3/x
So doctors took the president into surgery (usually they just leave bullets in you!). A common misnomer is that the doctors operated to remove an explosive round. Hinckley did use "Devastator" bullets, but docs wouldn't learn that for many hours. 4/x
So enter David Adelberg. 31. A nobody. He had gotten up that morning planning to do some random operation. But Dr. Benjamin Aaron, the main chest surgeon, insisted he keep his regular team together for Reagan's surgery. This was a key decision. 5/x
Dr. Daniel Ruge, an esteemed brain surgeon and the WH physician, insisted that Aaron treat Reagan like any other patient. He knew protocols worked. He didn't want Reagan to fall victim to VIP syndrome. So that meant Aaron kept his normal team together. No big shots. 6/x
So Adelberg, Aaron's intern, found himself in the operating room, and assisting the surgeon as he operates -- opening up Reagan's chest, fixing wounds, stopping the bleeding and hunting for the bullet. 7/x
To give Aaron more space to work, Adelberg reached into Reagan's chest, gently cupped the president's beating heart in his hand and nestled it aside. A 31-year-old surgical intern LITERALLY held the beating life of the president in his hand. 8/x
To make a long and dramatic story short, Aaron found the bullet. Smashed into the shape of a dime, it had tumbled end over end upon entering the president, chewing up arteries, thus explaining the extensive bleeding. 9/x
Reagan recovered, obviously. I may tweet more on 3/30/81, and why this day made Reagan's presidency.

But I have been thinking about circumstance and how ordinary people get thrown into extraordinary events. And it brought to mind Adelberg. 10/x
A dude who got up on March 30, 1981, to do some random/mundane surgery and wound up holding the president's beating heart, playing a small but vital role in saving the president's life. -30-

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Del Quentin Wilber

Del Quentin Wilber Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DelWilber

18 Nov 20
Did a cruise through Wayne County Canvassing Board member William Hartmann's public Facebook posts. He's a Republican, so not a surprise he is a BIG Trump supporter

I'll let you judge a sample of posts I pulled from 2010. He voted not to certify Wayne County's ballots.
Here is link to his Facebook page: facebook.com/handidude2000/…
also into conspiracy theories
Read 5 tweets
24 Sep 20
According to @bartongellman in Atlantic, the GOP/Trump is actually seeking a CONSTITUTIONAL way to keep Trump in power. In states with tight/disputed election results, repub-controlled legislatures could pick the slate of electors. It would be perfectly legal. 1/
They actually prepared for this in 2000 during the vote-counting disputes in Florida. 2/
latimes.com/archives/la-xp… Image
I suspect gop legislators would justify taking such a step to end uncertainty over counting votes and Trump stoking fears of voter fraud. The public would want to end the mayhem/confusion. Just like 2000. And this would be one way to do it. 3/
Read 5 tweets
25 Jul 20
I have convinced @MarkPuente (grill master extraordinaire) to lead a Zoom on cooking the perfect ribeye! We will grill together (virtually on Zoom), have a few drinks and leave with fully bellies. DM me to join. @PressClubDC
6 p.m. Aug 12.
Thread on what you can expect:
Read 5 tweets
24 Jun 20
Legal eagles question: Do prosecutors have an ethical obligation to drop a guilty plea case if they can't prosecute it any longer? This is about Flynn. It would be a terrible trial for DOJ (with all the politics, strzok, texts, notes, etc). 1/x
I ask in this context. Let's say a guy pleaded guilty to gun possesssion. But the cop who arrested him was fired for doing something. And the DNA on the gun came back to someone else. Now, the dude pleaded guilty. There might even be security video of it. ...
But prosecutors couldn't win it at trial. Do prosecutors have an obligation to drop a case like this if they don't think they can win it? Now, Flynn is a little different in sense that his plea specifically says doj can use those admissions as evidence against him...
Read 5 tweets
17 Jun 20
Justice Department is mulling criminally charging @AmbJohnBolton for disclosing classified info in his upcoming memoir and is expected to soon seek a restraining order blocking publication (set for june 23).
latimes.com/politics/story…
Which you can read about here:
washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
Read 4 tweets
14 May 20
Short thread on why it doesn't seem like FBI was setting up Flynn, and he pleaded guilty to the least-worse charge in a deal that was going to result in NO jail time. 1/x
If the FBI was intent on setting up Flynn, Strzok made a major blunder in an interview with FBI agents in July 2017 (four months before Flynn pleaded guilty). He admitted he didn't think Flynn was lying at the time or that Flynn himself thought he was lying. This is important
There are two key components of the 1001 charge -- lying to federal agent -- materiality and willfulness. That means the lie has to be important and the defendant has to know he is lying.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!