I’m gay & celibate & can honestly say that celibacy has been a life-giving experience for me. Gay celibacy is not inherently toxic.
But here’s the thing: When you tell gay ppl they *must* be celibate or else go to hell, you are not preaching the Gospel. You are preaching death.
Celibacy is life-giving, for gay ppl as well straight, when discovered in the *midst* of relationship with Jesus Christ, not as a condition to be in relationship with Jesus in the first place.
No one’s salvation hinges on what we do, think, or believe a/b gender & sexuality. If it did, none of us would go to heaven. “He who is w/o sin, cast the first stone.” If you think your theology on gender & sexuality is perfect, you’re in for a surprise when you get to heaven.
“But if gay people think they don’t need to be celibate in order to go to heaven, they’ll think they can get away with anything! Nobody will be celibate if they’re not afraid of hell! We need hell to convince gay people to be celibate!”
If you really believe that the primary motivating factor behind a person’s theology and vocation is fear of hell, then you’re own theology has some serious issues.
Fear is never a healthy motivator for anybody. It’s kryptonite to a healthy theology.
I’m not afraid of going to hell if I stop being celibate, and guess what, I’m still celibate! That’s bcuz—shocker—I actually believe that celibacy offers me a pathway to living my best life.
But if I thought my salvation *depended* on me being celibate, it would literally suck the joy out of my vocation. It would be like a slow-dripping poison, corrupting my entire faith, turning it into a desperate attempt to be sexually pure enough to get into heaven.
This is not the Gospel. This is death.
“Well, you’re theology must not be very well-developed then. You must be one of those wishy washy progressive woke Christians who don’t really take the Bible seriously.”
Actually, my theology is pretty conservative. I follow traditional teachings on marriage between opposite sexes & if I was married to a man, I wouldn’t even practice birth control. I’m about as traditional & straight-laced as it gets.
But guess what. We don’t need to hold our theological convictions on sex and marriage in judgment against others with different convictions or even against ourselves should we mess things up.
Our theological convictions should never be motivated by fear and condemnation. Healthy theology should be *Good News* to us. This is the very meaning of the Gospel.
Gender & sexuality are not issues of primary significance to the Christian faith. We can differ in our understanding of these things and still respect each other as siblings in Christ.
The Bible doesn’t teach “salvation by sexual ethics through faith in Jesus Christ.” It teaches salvation by *GRACE* through faith in Jesus Christ, not a result of works, even works of sexual purity like celibacy.
If you’re queer & wrestling with fear of going to hell, I want you to know and internalize a simple Gospel truth: Your salvation does not rise & fall on your gender & sexuality. You will not go to hell if you stop being celibate.
Sit in this truth and let it change your relationship to your faith. If you really do believe that God wants you to be celibate, let God lead you there in the safety of God’s love. Don’t enslave yourself to a theology of hell and damnation. This is not the Gospel. This is death.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
LGBTQ people experience some of the highest rates of medical discrimination in the country. When we experience illness, many believe we deserve to be sick & die.
And now it’s legal in Arkansas to deny us ANY healthcare service on the grounds of “moral conscience.”
The only qualifier in this bill is that doctors must provide care in the case of an “emergency.” This is laughable, as the vast majority of healthcare services—many if not most of which are lifesaving—do not fall under the category of “emergency.”
Some argue that the bill does not name LGBTQ people explicitly, so it’s not actually targeting LGBTQ people. Again, this is laughable. We all know what demographics this law is going to be used against the most. Laws like these in the US *always* target LGBTQ people and women.
1. White progressives going at Jesus for being “racist” toward the Syrophoenician woman is peak 2021.
News flash. “Racist” Jesus isn’t a thing.
2. The claim centers on the story of the Syrophoenician woman begging Jesus to cast a demon out of her daughter. Jesus responds, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs” (Mk 7:27).
What’s going on here? Is Jesus being a racist a**hole?
3. The Bible is a piece of literature as much as it is a historical document. Pay attention to the structure of the Gospel of Mark and it becomes pretty clear what’s going on.
The idea that rape is a product of “sexual temptation” stems from a toxic relationship to sexuality.
If you believe that sexual attraction is an overwhelming animal urge that requires a Herculean level of self-control granted only by prayer and spiritual maturity, then it’s easy to believe that ppl (in particular cisgender men) are constantly on the verge of raping other ppl.
In this worldview, *not* raping ppl becomes a virtue unto itself. If sexual attraction is always & only ever compelling people to sexually devour each other, then *not* raping ppl is a sign of self-control!
“How can you be gay & celibate & not inherently self-hating?”
I get asked this question a LOT. People assume that the only reason a gay person would be celibate is internalized homophobia.
But they’re wrong.
Gay people can be celibate for all kinds of reasons.
Maybe they just don’t like sex very much and don’t particularly want to have it. Yes, it’s possible to have a sex drive and experience sexual attraction but still not enjoy having sex.
Or maybe they’re just asexual and don’t experience sexual attraction in the first place. Yes, gay people can be asexual and asexual people can be gay.
I’m celibate. I follow historic Christian teaching on sexual ethics by default. Straight people who practice contraceptive sex don’t.
A lot of ppl get angry when I make this observation. They feel like they’re being judged. Like I’m telling them that they’re living in sin just for having sex with someone they love. That’s interesting, because it reminds of how gay ppl feel.
To be clear, I’m NOT saying that you’re living in sin for having contraceptive sex with your spouse, so no worries. I don’t think you’re living in sin! Birth control is a human right, & denying access to contraceptives leads to horrendous abuses, most often toward women.
“If you don’t vote in this election it’s because you’re a selfish, privileged elite who can’t understand the needs of the oppressed.”
This is a bald-faced lie fabricated (ironically) by political elites in order to bully other ppl into voting. [thread]
First,
The older richer & whiter you are the more likely you are to vote. There’s a multitude of reasons for this but most pertinent is that ppl are more likely to feel represented by our two-party political system if they are older richer & whiter. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Second,
Non-voters are more likely to be poor, less educated, and non-white. Surveys of low-income and POC citizens report high levels of voter disengagement due to feeling unrepresented in politics and the belief that voting won’t make a difference.