Someone emailed me to say there appears to be an error in the government's Covid guidance - repeated four times.
"You must not socialise indoors with anyone you do not live with or have formed a support bubble with."
I agree there should be a "not" before "formed"
Also here
And here
And here
The whole point of support bubbles (which the govt guidance is clear on) is once you form one it is as if two households become one household, which applies for meeting indoors or outdoors.
Here is a link to the guidance. I hope it hasn't unduly confused people (assuming I am right, which I think I am as the text doesn't fit with the overall scheme or the point of support bubbles)
A lot of police officers fairly saying at the time of @ReclaimTS vigil report that HMICFRS has previously been critical of police. But this whistleblower suggests they have a particular political agenda when it comes to peaceful protest.
This also highlights how unclear the law remains. There is an exception for gathering if they protest organiser has submitted a risk assessment etc. But how is a *participant* to know whether the risk assessment has been submitted or is sufficient?
No doubt police will treat a protest which has become what they consider to be a public health risk as illegal. But if the organiser has gone through the necessary precautions, there is no illegality. Again, too much is in the hands of the police who are not public health experts
You may notice my view is basically: I can see the serious risks to liberties, I can see some possible benefits, as a policy it’s more justifiable in care homes than pubs. If it makes lockdowns less likely then I don’t think it can be fully discounted by libertarian arguments.
It is obvious now (if it wasn't before) that the Metropolitan Police were confused about the law even after the Holgate judgment on Friday afternoon.
What has been the impact of getting the law on the right to protest wrong during this lockdown?
As I and other lawyers acting for @ReclaimTS have said, the Met Police did not fully understand their legal duties to facilitate safe, peaceful protest.
Apparently @theJeremyVine saying that visiting a second home in England is currently illegal - this is wrong. It is currently legal. There is no *legal* restriction on travel and no legal requirement to stay at any particular home.
1/3
The only relevant legal question is whether you are part of an unlawful gathering. If you are just with your household indoors, or with your linked household, or fall into another exception, it doesn't matter where you are. See my thread 2/3
You can find the rules from tomorrow to "not before" 15 April in Schedule 1 to the Steps (💃🏻🕺🏻💃🏻🕺🏻💃🏻) regulations which is here: legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/364/…
The key thing to understand is that the "being outside home without a reasonable excuse" requirement will go.
What remains:
- Bans on gatherings "indoors" of 2 or more people
- "Outdoors" it's rule of 6 or two households
- Sports and childcare gatherings