The Age of the Aantel is Over. The Age of the Bhodrolok is upon us.
Bengali Hindu politics has always been dominated by Bhodroloks, from the late 19th Century to well after independence. The Aantels took over a couple of decades after the independence era and that era has continued yet. On the 2nd of May, all of that could change.
The Aantels, themselves, are Bhodroloks who have gone over to the dark side. The Bhodroloks, after the set back, have expanded their base and look poised to storm back into power.
Bhadralok is not a caste-related term. Literally speaking, it means 'cultured' people. But nonetheless, it is true that historically, the term has been associated with landed castes and Upper Castes. Nonetheless, elites, regardless of caste, automatically fall in this category.
This distinction is important because people often confuse Bhodrolok to be a caste-specific term. It is not. A person here, with no ill intention, claimed that Dilip Ghosh is not a Bhodrolok. Don't let Dilip da hear you say that. Because Dilip da is the quintessential Bhodrolok.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ashok Singhal: His father was in the Indian Civil Service. He got a bachelor's degree in Metallurgical engineering from the BHU. And it was all before he joined the VHP in any significant position. He was not a "subaltern" by any stretch of imagination.
The RSS Chief at the time was Madhukar Dattatreya Deoras. Again, he had an LLB Degree from the University of Nagpur. He went to "New English High School" in his childhood. Again, not a subaltern by any stretch of imagination.
There's tragedy in this world, real tragedy. But there's also beauty and happiness and love and kindness. If you immerse yourself too much in the former, which is extremely easy, and forget the latter, you'll only turn yourself into a force multiplier for the former.
There are many people with very good reason to turn to the dark side. It is incumbent upon the rest of us to help them overcome the monsters within. But in our efforts to empathise with them, we should be careful not to glorify anti-social behaviour itself.
The problem with democratic societies is that they have justified anti-social behaviour as a legitimate manner of voicing grievances. To further complicate matters, such decisions were motivated by political calculations. These violent delights do have violent ends.
First question on the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court by Donald Trump.
Trump: "We won the elections. Elections have consequences."
Biden: "The American people have the right to say who their SC nominee is. They're not going to get that now."
Joe Biden says he opposes Judge Barrett because of her apparent opposition to the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). Significantly, he does not bring up abortion.
Donald Trump emphasizes that he was elected for a period of four years, not three.
Joe Biden brings up abortion (Roe v Wade). He says that it's on the ballot as well. Donald Trump disagrees. He says that it is not on the ballot and Biden does not know Barrett's opinions on the verdict.
1. While it can be conceded that no one ceases to become Hindu just because he has consumed beef, it also has to be noted that consumption of beef is not acceptable in Hinduism and those who do so would justifiably attract harsh criticism for consuming beef.
2. The article credits RSS for the North East not falling entirely to Abrahamism. This is just extremely factually incorrect. Bengali Hindus and Assamese Hindus are to be credited for that.