More absurd fear mongering crap from the UK. Sorry for being so crass but this is getting to me. People with PTSD get to self report symptoms that they think may have been from a possible infection. WTAF? Let’s take a look...
Coughs can be linger because of simple post nasal drip. Keep hold up in your dusty, allergen ridden house for a year and you too can develop a cough. webmd.com/cold-and-flu/f…
Let us not forget that way back in July I discussed “post viral syndrome” and how it can happen.
Stop the presses...any duration? They have to be joking, right?
Glad they showed at least some limitations. Too bad people will ignore this part entirely.
Now is a good time read this. But before you just read the headline and get conclusions actually read it... vox.com/22298751/long-…
As I have been saying for months, this isn’t unique to covid and ALL viruses have the potential to cause long term issues. And studies like that self reported survey minimize people who actually are suffering. And we do greater harm in the long run.
Some will have longterm issues. Let’s attempt to focus on actuals so people who really need it can get help.
2.5 million people, often women in the US alone end up with CFS. Happens every single year and no one ever batted and eye and interestingly has several of the symptoms reported in the UK survey. Myalgia and sore throat were on the list.
Decades of research suggest even mild pneumonia can have symptoms that linger for months. From 1999 link.springer.com/article/10.104…
This is the reality. For over a year people have lost so much. The stress impact on physical well-being is astonishing. And when governments do things like let a mentally fragile populous self report and then use that data to frighten others they have gone too far. Do better UK.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: I've been hesitant to touch masks because of the hot button nature of them but this is getting out of control. New models showing thousands of lives will be saved by February is we all just mask up. It's absurd on it's face. 1/ statnews.com/2020/10/23/uni…
The science is unsettled. For every study saying they help, you can find the contrary saying they don't. That's the point. The OP is absurd. There is ZERO evidence to show thousands of lives will be saved because of masks. 2/
Modeling has been wrong on virtually everything since March. Viruses will do what they do, they don't care about your masks. Decades of research show that. The science didn't change the politics did. What a shame. 3/
Basic math destroys this one. If Sturgis had 250,000 cases link then at a IFR of 0.26% then there will be 650 deaths and there has been one. Unless of course the IFR is far far lower than that. Which would be even better news. 2/
SD had a “peak” of 623 cases in August 27 and it has dropped since then. So I’m not sure how they have the highest rate of infection. They’ve also not had any increased deaths in the state they have been hobbling along in the single digits for the whole epidemic 3/
THREAD: Because frankly I’m growing increasingly tired of countering those who are ignoring studies coming out from across the board showing children are not the drivers of this illness... 1/
“Mark Woodhouse, a leading epidemiologist and member of the government’s Sage committee, told The Times that it may have been a mistake to close schools in March given the limited role children play in spreading the virus.”
“Indicative data show there is no diff in the overall incidence of the lab-confirmed C19 cases in children aged 1 to 19 years in the two countries; contact tracings in primary schools in Finland found hardly any evidence of children infecting others.” 3/ bloomberg.com/amp/news/artic…
THREAD: I finally found the study I had read a while back and wished I had saved. This study was over an 8 yr period in MI. It followed several families and 4 HCoVs during that time. Children weren’t always the index cases. 1/
Let’s look at the study and some of the conclusions. “993 HCoV infections were identified during the 8 years, with OC43 most commonly seen and 229E the least.” 2/
“From 2010–11 through 2015–16, eligible households were those with 4 or more members at least 2 of whom were younger than 18 yrs. In subsequent yes, eligible households contained 3 or more members including at least 1 child younger than 5 yrs (2015-16) or <10 yrs (2017–18).” 3/
THREAD: There’s a lot to unwrap here. Basically in 2003 during the SARS outbreak there was a elder home in British Columbia which had an outbreak of a coronavirus. 1/ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Because of the SARS outbreak in Asia they did RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV on the residents of a nursing home and they came back positive. Remember I have explained before that RT-PCR testing has limitations, it detects viral particles, and can also return a positive if... 2/
...another virus is present like in this instance. This was frightening because that could decimate a nursing home, and be in the community at large which could also be undesirable. The illness though, wasn’t displaying the exact characteristics of SARS infection 3/
THREAD: For those still claiming the “longterm effects” are unique to #covid19 haven’t been paying attention to other viral illnesses. Let’s take a look: 1/ erj.ersjournals.com/content/45/5/1…
Ground glass opacity is not a new term. It has been seen with flu. It’s important to understand this can be acute and resolve within months. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…