If you’re a Muslim in Malaysia, especially if you’re “born" into the religion, Article 11 of the Federal Constitution is a myth, at best. And at worst, a blatant lie.
Effectively if you’re Muslim, there is NO freedom of religion. In addition to many other NO FREEDOMS you enjoy
The first clause in Article 11 reads as thus:
“Every person has the right to profess and practise his religion and, subject to Clause (4), to propagate it”
Note that ‘every person’ in literary terms means there is no distinction between which person.
In practice, however, a Muslim in Malaysia practically doesn’t enjoy this right. Let’s not even talk about religions other than Islam - a Muslim may ONLY practice what the state allows one to practice, or more accurately, seen to practice.
And by this, I mean Sunni of the Shafi’i persuasion, except for selected areas of practice that are cherrypicked from the other three of the Big Four (i.e. Hanafi, Maliki, Hanbali).
But it’s not up to you to decide. No, a Muslim in Malaysia has no right over her/his faith.
One only has the right to remain silent, obey, or otherwise. Put a little more simply, "Believe what we tell you to believe. OR ELSE.”
Lovely, eh?
But, I guess since the majority find happiness in mental and spiritual bondage, who am I to say anything, right?
So forget what I said, for the moment, and consider what The Amman Message says: ammanmessage.com
Certainly more authoritative than Walski, that’s for sure.
The 3 key points of the Amman Message (paraphrased):
1) The validity of 8 Mathhabs (legal schools) of Sunni, Shi’a and Ibadhi Islam; of traditional Islamic Theology (Ash’arism); of Islamic Mysticism (Sufism), and of true Salafi thought
(cont.)
2) The forbidding of ‘takfir' (declarations of apostasy) between Muslims
3) Fatwa dos and don’ts in order to expose ignorant and illegitimate edicts in the name of Islam
I’m not sure about the value of one’s John Hancock (signature) in your world, but in mine it’s a symbol of giving your word.
So while FIVE Malaysian delegates put their name to paper (see earlier tweet in the thread), Malaysia seems to pretty much ignore the Amman Message
In particular, continuing to carry out practices CONTRARY to the first point. Frankly, I don’t know enough about the 2nd and 3rd points in as far as Malaysia is concerned, so I won’t comment further.
But the 1st point, and arguably the most important, being ignored?
And when did Malaysia become a signatory to the Amman Message? July 2005. Yes, almost 16 years ago.
Frankly, I don’t recall this even being reported in 2005. Nor has much of it been mentioned since. I personally only got to know about the Amman Message about 4-5 years ago.
And that, too, quite by accident.
So, we agree - at least in principle - but refuse to practice what we agree to at home.
But, it is what it is. And I expect there will be little change to the amount of NO FREEDOM Muslims here enjoy.
So until the unthinkable happens, Muslims with minds of their own will have to continue a life of duplicity, constantly looking over their shoulders, and being wary about who can or cannot be trusted.
As if just plain regular life didn’t present enough to worry about…
The Malay Mail hari ini melaporkan tentang pengakuan Hadi Awang bahawa Langkah Sheraton telah dirancang sebaik sahaja GE14 tamat. Penulisan asal beliau boleh dibaca di laman FBnya: facebook.com/abdulhadiawang…
Bebenang ini adalah komentar peribadi saya.
1/ Selepas membaca rencana asal tersebut, ternyata betapa angkuh dan takburnya si Hadi ini. Juga ternyata yang kepentingan paling utama partinya adalah parti itu sendiri. Tapi tak apa… agama sentiasa boleh ditunggang untuk mengkaburkan mata rakyat
2/ "Perubahan kerajaan PH kepada kerajaan PN dilakukan secara demokratik dan mengikut proses Perlembagaan Persekutuan dengan langkah paling tepat, tanpa menebuk atap dan masuk dari pintu belakang.”
Inil terang2 adalah percanggahan kognitif (Cognitive Dissonance)
So today, we once again reinforce the culture of “Don’t like it, Ban it”. No thanks to pressure from the Malaysian Ultra-Conservatives whose wet dream is nothing less than making EVERY-DAMNED-THING-THEY-DON’T-LIKE illegal.
These are the people who have clout because most Malays who don’t agree with them do not dare speak up and speak out. The reality is that in Malaysia, turning 18 means nothing more than being liable for prosecution and persecution.
FYI I am not a fan of Sugarbook, but as I understand it’s a willing-party kinda deal. Adulthood is about making choices, and taking responsibility for the consequences of your choices. But no… these conservatives wanting to “protect the younger generation” is about CONTROL.
0/ You can thank @yoongkhean for this. Here’s my “How to NOT Get Lost In Publika” guide, over a short thread. FYI I operated our gallery from Publika for the better part of 9 years.
The guide begins in the next tweet...
@yoongkhean 1/ The first thing to know is that there are FOUR (4) blocks: A,B,C, and D in Solaris Dutamas overall. Publika occupies blocks B & C, and part of A - these are the OFFICIAL parts of Publika. But for the sake of simplicity, we’ll just call it all Publika (actually Solaris Dutamas)
@yoongkhean 2/ Each of the four parallel blocks are sub-divided into 4 or 5 sections. Hence, A1-A4 (A5 is where White Box / Black Box are), B1-B4, C1-C5 and D1 to D5. Blocks A & B / C & D hv foot bridges that link btw them. A & B linked on Level G3 (2 bridges), while C & D on G4 (3 bridges)
As someone involved in one sector of the creative industry, the biggest problem I see impeding its growth - even bigger than funding - is the lack of appreciation for the arts, and how little value the arts and things creative.
I know it’s an unpleasant truth, but...
… until and unless we accept this as a root cause, simply throwing money at the problem is NOT going to advance the creative industry.
It’s not an impossible problem to solve, but neither is this problem solvable in the short term.
If there’s a silver lining to Saifuddin Abdullah’s #FINASFUBAR it’s the general public’s realization that the FINAS Act is as relevant to the 21st century as a 56K dialup modem is relevant to today's Internet experience.
The act was enacted and gazetted in 1981. For those of you not born yet then, in 1981 there was no Astro and all you had was RTM TV1 & TV2 to entertain you on television.
The act was drafted to facilitate the development of Malaysia’s film industry (let’s not go there)
[Cont.]
So yeah, the act is archaic, to put it mildly. But it’s still an active law.
It defines “film” to include "feature films, short films, short subject films, trailers, documentaries, advertising filmlets and any recording on material of any kind…”
Do watch the video, which I did earlier. A few observations:
1. True, the AJ video focus piece did not cover ALL aspects of Malaysia's handling of COVID-19. But it was a FOCUS piece on the alleged mistreatment of illegal immigrants, not an in-depth COVID-19 in MY documentary
2. About blocking comments - the YouTube posting by AJ initially did allow comments but was closed down AFTER being spammed by thousands of abusive comments. The rebuttal video gives the impression that the comments weren’t allowed from the get-go.
3. Govt’s lack of response from AJ for clarification/comments - the line of reasoning is the same as what some cybertroopers have been stating, that the Govt. was too busy handling COVID-19. Fair enough, but as we had seen there were several unnecessary photo-ops that happened..