“For a while, Hwang hedged the portfolio by shorting individual stocks. Some of those short positions, like Under Armour, performed exceptionally well. But others, particularly Tesla, did not.”

Archegos was $TSLAQ

forbes.com/sites/nathanva…
“So Hwang retreated from the individual shorts and emphasized broadly shorting the market.”

Told you so
The article quoted above independently corroborates most of what I wrote in my thread. And it too leaves us wondering what happened over the last 1-2 years (which is where I am curious):
Leading to Basis risk, when your longs and shorts go against you. When your hedges don’t hedge
The members of $TSLAQ who became armchair experts on Bill Hwang as of last Friday - might want to reconsider their position, seeing that he himself was a member of $TSLAQ himself 😂
I can literally see the brains exploding, of people who can’t handle that reality is complex:

- Bill Hwang was an early backer of Cathie Wood

- Bill Hwang was short $TSLA, got burned

$TSLAQ reaction:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LST

LST Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LongShortTrader

2 Apr
The archegos coverage is improving but there’s a key question that remains unanswered:

How/why/when did a guy whose portfolio was concentrated FAANG for many years (and before FAANG was an acronym) - my guess is 2012-2019 -

pivot into levered long highly shorted stocks?
We did diligence on Archegos 6 years ago - which is why I find most of the archegos coverage/comments laughable. None of you ever talked about them until last Friday. Armchair “experts” (meaning, quacks) all over.
Do the math- if their starting AUM was few hundred million $s and was concentrated FAANG - and had insanely long holding periods, maybe in some cases doubling down or averaging up - you then get to your few billion.

And that’s where my questions begin.
Read 20 tweets
1 Apr
My market predictions for rest of the year THREAD
S&P 500 will rise vertically to 6667 and then crash to 667 by Christmas.
Bridgewater and Remtech turn out to be the largest ponzu schemes in US history.
Read 13 tweets
1 Apr
Why do some of these people - for example, tech bros - write twitter threads or blog posts on why they’re moving to Florida/Miami?
It’s a free country - live/move wherever you please - but why make a public declaration? I have a few guesses

1. If they’re moving away from high tax jurisdictions like California they want to signal as loud as possible. should they get audited, they have additional “evidence”
2. They’re trying to encourage others - who are on the fence - to move there. “Network effects” etc etc

Am I being overly cynical here?
Read 6 tweets
1 Apr
“Family Offices Like Archegos Take Big Risks Like Hedge Funds”

Yet the article fails to name a single FO that takes big risks... even though it’s not difficult to work out which those are (at least some).
The statistically likely explanation: the journalists/editors behind the story truly don’t know.

The cynical explanation: they are fully aware, but the FOs of interest pay PR top $$$ to control articles written about them, or they use their $/influence in other ways to censor.
The one great observation of that article: it astutely points to cultural differences between FOs often arising from generational differences:

1st gen FOs (the generation that made the $) tend to be risk takers.

The subsequent generations.. I will leave it to you to imagine.
Read 4 tweets
1 Feb
There are only two priorities:

Grift + Griftmore
"Let's expand inequality by giving tax cuts to the rich." - Cham, UNIRONICALLY

Notable how 'Cham the scam' doesn't address inequality between ordinary income vs capital gain tax rates (don't get me started on the inequality versus HF/PE 'carry').

If you're serious, you address reducing ordinary income, or at least eliminating differences between these.
Read 5 tweets
31 Jan
-53%

That could be you or me ... markets humble all.
Also, there’s another fund that is -49% YTD, mentioned in that same article. Barely talked about in public forums!
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!