Here's a very underrated infrastructure idea: what if we invested in creating seamless transportation between airports and train stations?
Intercity rail is never going to be as cost effective in America as in Europe because everything is so much more spread out. BUT, the hub-and-spoke airline model often has you take one long flight and one short one. What if we could replace *just the short flight* with a train?
Imagine if we had a system that encouraged multi-modal trips.
Airlines would fly you to a big city relatively near your destination, then transfer your luggage on to Amtrak, shuttle you to the station, and you ride the rest of the way. The ticket lets you book this all in one.
This seems like a really good compromise. It would reduce the carbon footprint of travel, while not sacrificing a significant amount of time or flexibility.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I will say this for DeSantis: he at least seems to have a better intuitive grasp of what "marginal" Trump voters liked about Trump than, say, Hawley or Cruz.
DeSantis understands that the biggest thing isn't the far-right policy. It isn't even really the racism — that's the entire party at this point.
It's the way that Trump would take their every slightest frustration, and declare war on it. He would name the enemy, and go after it.
It's just such a simple, compelling kind of politics for people who don't want to think.
Identify who's the problem. Talk smack and get into a fight with them. Declare victory over them. Find the next person who's the problem. Repeat until America is great again.
I'm already seeing some on the right once again claiming that "the CDC" has proven that guns "save 2.5 million lives" per year.
So before we jump on that merry-go-round of bullshit, I'm going to debunk it again.
First, this 2.5 million number *doesn't* come from the CDC.
It comes from a 1992 survey by FSU criminologist Gary Kleck, who random-dialed a bunch of ppl, asked if they used a gun to defend themselves or their property in the last 4 years and extrapolated to the U.S. population.
There are a million problems with trying to measure defensive gun use this way.
First, there is no way to verify the respondents. Any of them could have fabricated an incident, named a real one that fell outside the 4 years, or even cast an aggressive gun use as a defensive one.
It's not really an endorsement of communism, though, to say that zero leaders who have ever sought to create a communist society have ever actually created one.
If I were to tell you that being able to fly is a great idea and everyone who jumped off a building and splatted on the pavement just never achieved it, that's not an endorsement of jumping off buildings.
Similarly, no matter how good a concept it is for humanity to transcend the need for states and classes, if communism the political theory never actually gets us there, at some point that is on the theory, not just on every individual political leader who "messed it up."
She's right. Antifa is not an organization, it's an ideology — literally, the ideology of fighting the far right.
It doesn't make sense to talk about antifa as if it's a specific political party or activist group, because it isn't — it's just a thing that people believe.
The phrase "antifa organized a protest" makes about as much sense as saying "pro-life organized a protest."
Sure, individuals and groups who oppose abortion could organize a protest. But pro-life itself can't organize anything. It's just an idea — it doesn't have agency.
Republicans certainly seemed to get this whenever Tea Party activists attacked members of Congress or made terroristic threats. Oh, the Tea Party is just a grassroots belief in small government, we aren't responsible if a few crazies with Gadsden flags behave like criminals.
NYC politicians have a comically bad understanding of Puerto Rican politics, because most Boricuas in NYC are descended from people who moved from the island during a time when there was a strong independence movement.
The independence movement tries to guilt and shame liberals into thinking they are the popular will. But the truth is, in the last 40 years independence has never polled over 6%. puertoricoreport.com/how-popular-is…
To put that in perspective, 26% of Texans wanted independence in 2016.
The idea that statehood is a "far-right" position is utter nonsense. Yes, Republican-affiliated politicians in PR support statehood, but so do Democratic-affiliated ones, including Gov. Pedro Pierluisi, who was explicitly elected on a statehood platform.