Yes, Facebook needs heightened regulations *and* antitrust enforcement but worth pointing out we’re also here because FTC and Congress were willing to get paid off in 2018/19 rather than deal with the core issues at the company. $5 billion to protect leadership and bury cover-up.
And yes, worth noting # of US personal records in this Facebook breach is similar to the case ⬆️. And that one we only were told in a report last year was used for election harms to suppress black voters. We also learned several people likely perjured themselves. ht @slpng_giants
So yes it matters it was never properly dealt with and instead Facebook leadership was either protected, even rewriting history through press leaks, or off launching “oversight” programs at leading academic institutions while public continues to be harmed.
Great get, @karaswisher interview of @tim_cook. Lean-in at 8:20-16:30 as Cook brilliantly discusses why privacy is “bedrock” - “one of top issues of 21st century.” We believe data policy extends to enforcement of competition policy with Googl and Facebook. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/swa…
Cook spends time answering why any tracking company (ahem, Facebook) would be treating privacy enhancements as existential. He reconfirms iOS 14.5 (see ATT) to enhance choice to not have apps track across apps rolls out in next two weeks. 🙏🏽 and he avoids company specifics...but
it’s the right point that it’s not existential for Facebook. It just constrains Facebook’s revenues and profits from mining your behaviors when you’re not choosing to use their apps. this is a good thing, no negative effect on users. Only FB’s stock. And don’t even get me...
whew, ok, I made it thru this new class action suit vs Google. 1) like state AGs, focused on ads at intersection of data policy and competition policy 2) lead also brought impressive suit vs Facebook in 2018 (still active) 3) feels more like racketeering👀 documentcloud.org/documents/2053…
there is an interesting claim how Google and Facebook mutually benefited each other enriching data. Reminder, Google merged cookies in Fall 2016 ahead of AG's alleged Facebook+Google collusion in 2017. Cites 🙏🏾WSJ/NYT reporting by @ryanjtracy@JeffHorwitz / @tiffkhsu@daiwaka.
Very interesting point: "Through this amendment, Google explicitly takes the position that nonconsensual surveillance of 'browsing history' is 'dishonest behavior.'"
Watch. Canada first sent Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg a summons to testify nearly two years ago. It’s incredible Facebook can still send in this guy yesterday to make statements like this to Parliament. Of course, when UK pressed too hard, Zuckerberg threatened them. 1/2
Just watch. Another from yesterday. 2/2
They sent him in 2019 to answer Parliaments from around the globe, too.
I would argue this is the most important line of questioning connecting data policy to competition. ETHI (ethics committee) also arrived there in 2019 and it’s why FB is so freaked out by data protection changes from Apple and govts. ht @juliedabrusin
another Facebook hearing underway, this one in Canada. Same pattern of the last few years. Facebook's Canada govt relations' exec (Kevin Chan) filibusters, summons to Zuckerberg, Chan comes back with colleagues to spin some more. parlvu.parl.gc.ca/Harmony/en/Pow…
Chan using prior narratives so far and then heavily leans into a case study with a publisher (Globe and Mail) which doesn't seem available to review. Keep you posted.
Canadian MP @AHousefather asks Chan good governance questions about why Zuckerberg won't answer to Canada. Chan states Facebook never threatens governments..I would have asked Chan about documented and reported threat of UK govt in demanding he testify. techcrunch.com/2020/12/08/mar…
Hearing involving CEOs of Facebook and Google starting now. Livestream here (or use cspan here (c-span.org/video/?510053-…) in U.S. if watching Congress grill CEO of Google on issues caused by YouTube on YouTube is understandably awkward to you). /1 energycommerce.house.gov/committee-acti…
here is a link to their written testimonies published last night. I'll be threading here starting around 12:45pm once they get past opening statements. /2
ok, I'm here. Just in time for @RepJeffDuncan's point of order on why the witnesses aren't being sworn in and their ability to also ask questions of counsel during the sessions. Next @USRepMikeDoyle gets straight to heart of the matter. /3