I did a bit on VonBraun, leading into the name Quistorp. The Earth Satallite Program, VonBraun was a paperclip, his wife carried the last name Quistorp. Let me do a quick summary. Starting with guy, Wernher Von Braun.
Now, as interesting as this guy is, he is not the focus of all this. It's this lady, his wife. We can see that she took her husbands last name, what about her family? I've followed the wife, now I'll follow their fathers. The green arrow in this instance.
Stick with me, just going to follow the fathers until the 1600's. Maria Irmengard Emmy Luise Gisela von Braun (von Quistorp) is the daughter of this man, Johann Franz Anton August von Quistorp.
Johann Franz Anton August von Quistorp is the son to, Werner Theodor August Friedrich Wilhelm von Quistorp. A closer view at that crest too.
Werner Theodor August Friedrich Wilhelm von Quistorp was son to, Johann Franz Anton August von Quistorp.
Johann Franz Anton August von Quistorp was son to, Ulrich August Wilhelm von Quistorp.
Ulrich August Wilhelm von Quistorp was son to, Johann Gottfried [von] Quistorp.
Johann Gottfried [von] Quistorp was son to, Bernhard Friedrich Quistorp.
Bernhard Friedrich Quistorp is son to, Lorenz Gottfried Quistorp.
Lorenz Gottfried Quistorp is a son to, Johann Nicolaus Quistorp.
Johann Nicolaus Quistorp was a son to, Johann(es) Quistorp. (If you haven't noticed we've had birthplaces in Rostock for some time now.)
Johann(es) Quistorp was a son to, Prof. Rev. Johannes Quistorp, Snr.
If you've stuck with me, congratulations, we've just traced Maria Louise von Braun (von Quistorp)s, the paperclip scientists wifes blood line back about 350 years. Why is this relevant?
Prof. Rev. Johannes Quistorp, Snr. Lets look at those titles. Rector is the second snip, so the leader or senior (perhaps most senior) at this instituion. A preacher, a theologist. An alchemist? A Rosicrucian? Stick with me.
Same time that John Dee, one of the brightest minds at the time was alive. A guy by the name of Shakspear was going ham. Francis Bacon doin his thing. Point is a lot of at least well speculated occult players.
Now how does this guy, Prof. Rev. Johannes Quistorp, Snr, tie into all of this occult/alchemist movement? The University and whom visited and housed a class there. Joachim Jungius
Now if Prof. Rev. Johannes Quistorp, Snr was the head honcho, they knew each other, Jungius was allowed to create a class there. Surely Quistorp signed off on it.
Societas Ereunetica sive Zetetica, honestly not a lot on it. 30 year war was 1618-1648, looks like the school was doneski as of 1622? Not even sure the translation honestly.
So what else do we have on him? If he knew about Dee, Bacon, DeVere, I would suspect perhaps there's more to it. Not that savy myself. However this next bit provides some context of how good this guy might have been.
This was said, at least according to the wiki. "While Jungius of Lübeck is a man little known even in Germany itself, he was clearly of such judiciousness and such capacity of mind that I know of no other mortal, including even Descartes himself, from whom we could better have.."
expected a great restoration of the sciences, had Jungius been either known or assisted." This guy said that, he's pretty decorated, so I take that into consideration.
The only thing that is super slam dunk is the fact this line goes all the way up to paperclip. Through Von Brauns wife, traced back 344 years to the birth of Prof. Rev. Johannes Quistorp, Snr. a very interesting character, living in a very interesting time.
Sure there's more to it, makes me wonder if there's more to the Francis Bacon angle, if Quistorp met with Dee, or DeVere, it would have been fairly early. Oh well, a question for another day. @ThreadReaderApp, please unroll.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Looking to times in between. Take it for what you will. I used the AirForce's most current tweet. Then CQBrowns most current. Time inbetween looks like this. That last 1929, is just kinda a guess, no drop 7,000 so flip it.
I've underlined that 14 days. On the first read, it didn't stand out. After looking at contents of the other drops, it did. I'll explain on the next bit.
Now you can see I've underlined that 14th. Kinda of speaks to 2/4, operating under 28 days this month. Notice Moon, new, Luna, follow the star[s]/[t]? Today is?
I've been quiet lately, seen this, figured I'ld post it up. Seen that B2, then the drop on the 24th made me think of a MOAB, so I compared the two. Looks like this.
The corrosponding drops look like such. Interesting enough at face value. The drop begs the question, Muellers testimony. When was it? 4 months difference on the delta.
Next in line was 2050. I'll come back to this one. Though of interest I've highlighted that number.
I didn't think too much of this at first, it says delta, though we have a three day gap on that, so it isn't a delta. I dunno though, stick with it, I haven't explained why I've pinned the tweet with this qoute.
This would be our second one, this however too, does not explain why I've RT'd StratCom so I'll move on for now. I'll do a side by side in the thread. If you look at the time stamps, some intervals pop out.
Times in between as it realtes back to the drops. This was a RT, so I took the RT time, and did the difference to the original tweet. Looks like this. I used, hours minutes, straight minutes, then the seconds, variated, moved the third to the first.
What are magazines good for? How about signals? Why am I asking this question, how did I get here? We have to look at times in between tweets from mil orgs, then plug the difference variations back into the boards. This is where I ended.
I started with these. Both from 1st SF Group. 16:43 today. Our comparison from yesterday at 20:28. Now intially I didn't know where I was going. So the SIGNAL stood out more then the magazine, so does Brennan, just saying. Keynote will be explained (kinda) shortly.
Our times inbetween are such. 20hours15minutes, 1,215minutes, [72,9]00seconds. Think of that 2790 as kind of a bonus drop, as it is outside the face value.
I do times in between tweets. Looking to the DOD for this one. Take that diff, plug it back into the drops and look for overlap and pattern. Today at 12:00 on the dot, minus yesterday at 20:31. Diffs translated as such, 1529, 929, 4755.
We'll do em individual, then a side by side, note the timestamps as they span across the boards, yet overlap with one another. 1529.
929. Again the note on the time. That weird Merkel ref. Note the yellow highlight as it goes with our next, and most current drop in this thread.