Student newspaper at Lowell HS calls for recall of school board members including former VP Alison Collins, who refused calls from mayor and dozens of officials to resign over her use of N-word against Asians and filed unhinged lawsuit thelowell.org/9446/opinions/…
The various videos, blog posts, tweets, resolutions, and other statements issuing from the SF school board are some of the key primary documents of the age
I forgot this golden moment when Collins denied that intent matters when it came to harmful expression
The difference of course is that the "harmful expression" that she was demanding be destroyed was historically significant art, while her own "harmful expression" was using the N-word to refer to a group of racially distinct students over whom she presides on the school board
Yes, she was referring to an incident in which some Asian kids bullied a Hispanic kid.
The answer is not to refer to Asians as a group feeding into white supremacy or to call them "house n_____s"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My first Asian friend at school was the son of a Hong Kong ship's captain from a wealthy merchant family who would beat the hell out of his two sons and wife.
My parents got upset when he told me that physical strength was the most important thing in life.
He moved to the rural West of NJ by the PA border in third grade and became a hugely muscled redneck.
It was useful for my formative years that the toughest bully in class was an Asian kid
Elizabeth Warren was a lower-middle class white woman from a middling law school. She did what she had to do.
I'm pointing out that this cuts in both directions: 1.) she stole a position that was supposed to help native people and appropriated it for herself as a white woman, 2.) she was responding to a system that favors POC and a class of wealthy white incumbents.
Her act was far more revealing of the nature of the system than anyone quite lets on
Yang has had a certain Teflon quality throughout the mayoral race and the municipal political lifers who know they have to tear him down to have a chance must also be weighing this imperative against their own political futures if the favorite wins
Calling him a mini-Trump is of course obscenely wrong in one sense, but not entirely wrong in another sense: he gives people an opportunity to vote against the entrenched political system per se for the first time. (And the promise of more competence in being an alternative.)
CDC withdrew guidance that would prioritized essential workers before the elderly (who are the by far the most likely to die from covid) because the latter group was disproportionately white after the guidance attracted controversy.
But here's Scott just going for it.
This is how it works...a tentative trial balloon, then tactical retreat in the face of pushback...then you barrel over the finish line in defiance of the Equal Protection clause because the new elite consensus supports it and nothing ultimately hems in elite consensus
This thread is interesting because it describes academics constrained from speaking what they believe to be true for fear of social consequence while denying that they are “afraid of being canceled” or that such a development is a “crisis of free speech”
It shows how one may describe precisely X but still being constrained from calling it X, thereby...underscoring the depth and intensity of X in the very act...
Thread about my Chronicle of Higher Education piece on this subject: