What are the advantages when we compare Quantitative Finance and Quantitative Economics? How likely can a quantitative economics student find a job in the industry compared to quantitative finance? @ecmaEditors@economics@CQFInstitute@LSEeconomics
Both are different Pathways leading to different roles in the economy!
•QF - Quantitative Finance will make you more employable in the financial services industry and across (Financial Risk, ERM, Insurance, Actuarial Finance and Derivative Modelling) consulting sectors.
•QE - Quantitative Economics will enhance your chances of getting hired across the research arms of the financial services industry or the (Civil services) bureaucracy, & /or it further enables you to do a PhD in Mathematical Economics / Econometrics, etc.
Normally, QF and QE roles interface at Retail Banks, Hedge Funds, Investment banking firms, Pension Funds, Life/ Casualty Insurance and other types of specialized asset management companies, etc.
Hard to say, as to which academic qualification gives you an outright cutting edge, but I guess Quantitative Economics will make you more employable and preferable in the academic sector, whereas the Quantitative Finance Degree / Qualification, will enhance your prospects
Normally many Econ Graduates end up with CQF or a #CFA/ FRM/ CERA qualification, because their education prepares them for a completely contrasting (teaching/research) role, ideally at some university or a civil services department within the Public Sector.
Whereas, QF / Financial Engineering will give you the much needed “hands-on experience “ of readily transferring your knowledge and skillsets at the Micro-enterprise level, which usually could be a Commercial bank or a mutual / hedge fund style investment company.
The taxonomies used by professionals in either of these programs are more or less the same, and they are not mutually exclusive!
There is this cross-fertilization of concepts and ideas taking place across both subjects (QE and QF/ #Financial#Engineering).
It also depends on where you have obtained your degree(your university/ business school) and what courses/electives you have studied. If you do your QE degree with electives such as Game Theory, International Trade Economics, Advanced Microeconomic Theory, Industrial Economics,
Labour Economics, Public Finance, and other peculiar Economic courses such as CGE - Computational General Equilibrium Models and so on; perhaps, you won't be able to justify & simplify your work/analysis in the financial sector with the same level of comfort.
It is easier for #bankers and fund managers to understand financial terms and taxonomies instead of Economic jargon.
This is based on my personal experiences gained over these years.
You, with your highly theoretical and pedagogical terms and taxonomy, in “#Economics”, might also create problems for your unit head aka “reporting line”, who at best might be an #MBA, a Diploma holder in Banking, or some MSc in Finance/ Acct kind of discipline.
Normally, banks and FIs, promote those who are street smart and get things done on time.
That is a different debate for a different day.
Got my hint?
So, choose your electives and specialization path within the two programs in a wise way!
Two striking resemblances btw #SVB & former @CreditSuisse.
Both banks did not pay attention to the top 8–20 risks, which every board must.
Either these banks kept their risk desks understaffed or didn't hire key managerial position holders at all.
Why?
Need introspection now.
@CreditSuisse It was reported on this forum that #SVB did not have a CRO for some 8 months during the VC Market spiralling.
Also, I read just now that former @CreditSuisse was sacking key MDs in their across their risk desks.
This trend continued since the #Archegos fiasco surfaced after 2019
CRO Chief Risk Officer or Head of Risk Management is a key managerial decision-making position and C Suite Level role which every financial institution can afford to keep empty these days.
The Front, Middle, and Back Office roles form key lines of defence against top risks.
Russia and China were masterfully wedged by the Nixon Admin and Kissinger with the help of Pakistan, which was then led by Gen Yahya.
Now, history has brought the two Cold War Rivals closer.
This will create new Geopolitical, Geoeconomics and Geostrategic risks for the USA.
The biggest foreign policy and strategic failure of the USA has been that it didn't see the thaw between Iran and KSA coming
The entire Muslim world is now bifurcated into Russian & Chinese Camps
Hardly any Muslim nation will back America if a war breaks out between larger powers
Pakistan, the only Moslem Power with nuclear weapons, is the closest Chinese Ally not just in South Asia but the whole world.
It's akin to Italy under the Axis Power cosigned Pact of Steel or how Austro Hungarian Empire was buttressing the Kaiser.
BRI's epicentre is Gawadar.
Not every financial company should be structured as a bank, thereby accepting deposits, intermediating funds across markets, and reporting capital adequacy ratios using the @BIS guidelines.
This is the lesson I derive from the #SVBCollapse #SVBCrash
@Bis What is the point of pasting SVB CAR and Capital Ratio Metrics?
What sense could one derive from them before the run began?
They didn't reveal the full picture to the creditors, depositors, or shareholders.
CAR is a metric which exemplifies loss absorption capacity
Now?#SVBCrash
We need to revert to the Glass Steagall Act to understand economic history.
Why it was introduced in the aftermath of the Great Depression.
Why FDR and his team drew Chinese walls between Investment and Retail Banking institutions? federalreservehistory.org/essays/glass-s….
Yes, we have spoken a lot about public failure and the lessons we draw from the Socialist Bloc nations of Eastern Europe during the Cold War and the USSR as their patron-in-chief, which broke up due to state inefficiencies
We are not quick to pontificate about Market Failure #SVB
After GFC and several other frauds and financial failures within the private sector post-2008, it is time we hold corporate white-collar workers accountable for their misdeeds.
Yes, not everything is Fraud or portends to be a Financial Crime.
But, incompetence is a Moral Crime!
LTCM, Enron and WorldCom, GFC were only the tips of the iceberg.
American Corporate Management Standards have tremendously deteriorated due to a lack of professional ethics, or possibly due to a lack of competition.
When Japan & West Germany were competing, the Yanks did well.
Mutual funds do come with lock-in features! Especially if you are investing in a capital-protected product, you are not entitled to early encashment for a certain time.
Redemptions are deterred with the backend load. #Backstops are required in the banking arena beyond penalties
Of course, if you park liquidity in a time deposit liability side product, at a bank, you might have to pay a penalty for early withdrawal.
But, the highest liquidity risk is emanating from the sight deposits pool.
Run-on-the-bank risk is hard to mitigate if assets don't sell
Also, the standard practice is to call in the treasury department and borrow short-term through the interbank market to fund liquidity drains.
Call and Clean lending is done via the wholesale market for Fi credits.
Also, Repo markets can be used.
The #SVBCrash also further exposes the uselessness of the Basel 3 Accord and its modifications over the years
Why nobody is discussing the utter failure of @BIS_org which makes financial institutions invest billions in technology and staff recruitment, etc
We need answers
@BIS_org And the liquidity risk metrics reporting and filing which were introduced by @BIS_org under BASEL 3 were not fully implemented by the FED beyond certain large banks
But, still, certain aspects of Basel 3 were fully incorporated by the #SVB to make risk disclosures to the public.