1/ Are you interested in how to carry out a reintroduction based #rewilding project? Then this paper (& thread) is for you. Zamboni et al introduce the reintroductions of giant anteater, collared peccaries, tapirs and more to The Iberá Rewilding Program IRP (Argentina)
2/ The Iberá rewilding project is part of the 13,000km2 Iberá Reserve; made up of public & private land. It has marshes, lagoons, small rivers, temporarily flooded grasslands, savannas, and forests. The Conservation Land Trust bought 1500km2 of private land in 1999 to restore.
4/ Planning: 1) list the species missing, 2) participatory workshop with local experts to identify species to be reintroduced, 3) design and write recovery plans for each species: giant anteater, pampas deer, collared peccary, tapir, green-winged macaw, & jaguar,
5/ 4) assess knowledge and attitudes of local people toward giant anteater and jaguar. 5) work with experts to identify potential release areas and conduct qualitative habitat suitability assessment. For jaguars a formal quantitative habitat suitability assessment was done.
6/ 6) Population viability Assessment for anteaters under different reintroduction and management scenarios to help select the best management options. 7) Seek approval for release (which took between 6 months and 2 years), permission was mostly given to release captive animals
7/ The animals reintroduced were either rescued animals or from zoos. Pampas deer were translocated from wild populations. All animals had to be quarantined and then under went a soft release.
8/ Monitoring was an integral part of the project, all released animals were fitted with VHF transmitters. Monitoring post-release mortality and reproduction helped modelling of population trajectories.
9/ As of 2017 (when paper was published) 7 reintroductions of 5 species (giant anteater, pampas deer, peccary, tapir and green-winged macaw) had taken place. Two populations (giant anteater and pampas deer) are considered self-sustaining. Others continue to be supplemented.
10/ Lessons learnt from the project: 1) Communication: it was difficult to convince stakeholders to support & give permission. The public was generally ambivalent or negative initially. Successful development of the project (ecologically and from tourism) has been well received.
11/ 2) Bureaucratic challenges: Finding animals for reintroduction and obtaining permits for their transport and release was very time consuming. Expert involvement and support and clear recovery plans were important.
12/ 3) Funding: Initially the Conservation Land Trust supported the project. But the budget increased and external funding was required. Initial success in the anteater and pampas deer reintroductions gained credibility and with it support.
13/ 4) Species-specific challenges: No projects to model off so had to start with basics: “What do we know & what do we need to know? What should our general working approach be? How should we organize ourselves for each project? What are the potential areas of conflict?”
14/ Reintroduction order: started with the giant anteater which wasn’t seen as controversial. Followed by pampas deer which was the most urgent. No mention of jaguars was made until the reputation of the project was established.
15/ Monitoring helped improve reintroduction strategies. Don’t release animals in/near winter. Releasing anteaters in pairs helped anchor them to the release site. Releasing peccaries in small cohesive groups reduced aggressive behaviour & increased protection against predators.
16/ Get advice from experts with practical experience. There can be conflict with some conservationists and academics when challenging the status quo, in this case proactive management was met with scepticism.
Prehistoric or historic? What is the best baseline for #rewilding in the Neotropics? @JCSvenning and @FaurbySoren investigate the previous distribution of megafauna to inform future options of trophic rewilding in today’s #rewildingscience thread
Trophic rewilding – use of species to promote trophic cascades and self-regulating ecosystems often involves discussion around megafauna (large bodied species). Their high mobility, resitance to top-down effects, and ability to disperse nutrients makes them ecologically valuable
It is these species that have been subject to anthropogenic declines, including in the Neotropics. Historic baselines for species richness and distribution are now so intermingled with human effects that they may not represent a feasible point to base introductions on…
Kicking off the afternoon session of the #RewildingSymposium is @JCSvenning talking about 'restoring the role of megafauna in European ecosystems'
He begins by highlighting that current megafauna is unusually poor. Last at this level >30 million years ago. Historically, super diverse megafauna was the norm.
He points out that most current species are 100,000 to >1m years old. Meaning they have a complex evolutionary background with the landscape and complex ecological characteristics
Paul Jepson of ecosulis the first speaker of the day, stating that #rewilding presents a new narrative in conservation fit for the 21st century. There are many actors shaping it, but in particlar its an opportunity for young people to shape and define their future environment
He says the science behind current laws in particular Natura2000 are based on science which is 50 years out of date. We need to redesign laws across Europe based on a new narrative and incorporating modern scientific thinking on rewilding
1/ This week we end with the future directions of conservation paper by Jozef Keulartz (2016). #rewilding has varied forms, which rather than competing, can be complementary. Read this #rewildingscience thread and join in the discussion
2/ Which historical baseline is used as a reference state is one of the central debates in #rewilding. This can depend on cultural and ecological context of where rewilding takes place….
3/ It has been argued that historic baselines are irrelevant due to current anthropogenic drivers e.g. climate change making it difficult to recreate historical ecosystems. There are two thoughts; to abandon history entirely, or to move the baseline to a more distant past
1/ An exploration into the role of megafauna, ecosystem functioning and #rewilding is the topic of #rewildingscience today. Can we learn from the Pleistocene to influence today’s world for the better?
2/ As discussed in previous threads, megafauna have been in a state of decline and extinction since the late Pleistocene. Such large animals would surely have an impact on the environment so what are the consequences of their declines on ecosystem function?
3/ Understanding not only why they went extinct but how their loss effects ecosystem functioning is important for many reasons. Arguably the most pressing of which is how their legacy has an impact on the functioning of the current biosphere
1/ #Rewildingscience with rewilding as a new framework in management by P. Jepson (2016)
-People can experience ‘ecological boredom’ and show indifference to wildlife issues⬇️
-Rewilding embraces change around current management and reinvigorates 21st century #conservation⬆️
2/ Since ~2008 the number of rewilding articles has shown a sharp incline, highlighting the growing interest in this ‘radical’ form of ecological management. This challenges existing conservation frameworks…
3/ Conservation frames are shaped by scientific technologies, media, management practices and legislative practices. This dictates how we manage the environment. Rewilding could be introduced as a new frame, opening up debate on how nature ‘management’ should be approached