Once upon a time, there were real leaders. Not puppets.
When Winston Churchill became UK Prime Minister on 13th May 1940, Britain faced its greatest challenge – the reasonable certainty of invasion of the British Isles and highly probable defeat and subjugation by the Nazis (1).
Had Churchill been a 21st Century politician facing uncertainty, he’d have chosen the language of fear. Instead he allayed the Nation (and the World’s) worst fears by speaking only of the coming hardships and the certainty of victory (2).
“We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many many long months of struggle and of suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all our strength that God can give us: (3)
“to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark lamentable catalogue of human crime. This is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. Victory – victory at all costs, victory is spite of all terror,” (4)
“victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realized; no survival for the British Empire; no survival for all that the British Empire had stood for,…” (5)
“no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards it goal. But I take up my task with buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men” (6).
Sir Winston Churchill House of Commons 13th May 1940.
Where are the global leaders who will replace 2021 COVID-19 fearspeak with Churchillian eloquence and his certainty of ultimate victory (for the righteous)? (7)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Noakes

Tim Noakes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfTimNoakes

9 Mar
He's so right. If you have to obsess over something, obsess over insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, T2DM. Rest is pretty irrelevant. Latest study from the Women's Health Initiative reported in JAMA in January FINALLY proves this jamanetwork.com/journals/jamac…
Study's SO IMPORTANT because it comes from Women's Health Initiative which began in 1993 with specific goal of proving that low-fat "heart-healthy" US Dietary Guidelines will prevent T2DM, CHD, cancer, obesity etc. So authors' bias would always be to find in favour of that diet
So what did the study find?
T2DM increased risk of developing CHD 10-FOLD; metabolic syndrome 6-fold; hypertension 5-fold; obesity 4-fold! The best biomarker was lipoprotein insulin resistance at 6.4 fold increased risk. Nothing else came close. But what of LDL-Cholesterol?
Read 6 tweets
18 May 20
I've spent the last 12 months writing this @CrossFitHealth series on the great Ancel Keys Cholesterol Con. This column introduced 70 key events that happened over the past 100 years which first established the Con and then helped sustain it right to today
crossfit.com/health/ancel-k…
The reason why I've spent so long on this project is because since 2012 I've been accused repeatedly of "cherry-picking" evidence. Of course that's nonsensical since in my #HPCSA trial, as reported in #RealFoodonTrial, I presented 9.5 days of testimony without "cherry picking"
In these 70 events I've included every single (credible) study that has ever been used to support Keys Great Cholesterol Con. There is no "cherry picking". Which would be silly anyway since, when properly analysed, there are none, as far as I can see, that support his hypothesis.
Read 5 tweets
1 Oct 19
1/20 In rebuttal Drs Willett and Hu of @HarvardChanSPH continue to press Harvard’s plant-based anti-meat agenda. Was not always so at @HarvardChanSPH. May 1952 edition of Postgraduate Medicine carried an Editorial – Comments on Cholesterol – by Harvard’s Hegsted, Mann and Stare
@HarvardChanSPH 2/20 ‘…it should be pointed out that when exhaustive statistical analysis is required to show the correlation between two variables, such as lipoprotein level and atherosclerosis, it usually means that there are many other variables …’
@HarvardChanSPH 3/20 ‘whose effects are unknown or uncontrolled and that such correlations are of relatively LITTLE VALUE for predictive purposes. The fact that one may be able to show statistically significant correlation between two variables…’
Read 20 tweets
26 Jul 19
Suggestion: The 1977 USDGA should be called the President Eisenhower Diet after first eminent person to be prescribed the diet (by Ancel Keys PhD and Paul Dudley White MD in 1955) following President's 1st heart attack amzn.to/2ZzyigE
Over next 14 yrs, Eisenhower suffered 6 further heart attacks. His heart was defibrillated 14 times. He died in intractable heart failure. Heart transplant was not considered, amongst other reasons, because it was finally realised that he had T2DM (diagnosis originally missed)
At autopsy ”coronary atherosclerotic occlusive disease, multifocal, severe, with multiple recanalized thrombi” (p.321) is reported. His right coronary artery is patent; left anterior descending coronary artery has 10% narrowings; his circumflex artery is totally obstructed.
Read 7 tweets
22 Jun 19
Thanks @J_Imagineering So here’s my argument.
1. Humans eating rapidly assimilated carbohydrates develop post-prandial hyperglycemia in proportion to the rate at which glucose is absorbed from the intestine bit.ly/1ExzbZs (primate study noted).
2. Is there any evidence that postprandial hyperglycemia is good and serves an evolutionarily valuable function? Answer: Probably not. Supporting evidence: Why do human have a total circulating blood glucose mass of only 5 grams?
3. If post-prandial hyperglycemia is not desirable (in fact, probably harmful – see problems in T2DM) and has no evolutionary value, then why does it happen?
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!