12/7: Publix gives DeSantis PAC $50,000.
12/15(~): Florida gets vaccines.
12/15-12/30(~): DeSantis not ready to give Publix vax deal.
12/31: Publix gives DeSantis PAC another $50,000.
1/1-1/4: DeSantis decides to give Publix vax deal.
DeSantis admits CVS *and* Walgreens were *already* handling vaccines in mid-December, but *he* asked them to focus on long-term care facilities only—taking them out of the running against Publix for handling general vaccine distribution. I don't see how this looks better for him.
DeSantis was in regular contact with Trump during this period. Trump had *one concern*: funding his January 6 events. During the same 72-hour period Publix paid DeSantis $50,000, it appears the Publix heiress paid Trump's Stop the Steal agents $300,000 so he could hold his event.
I'm sorry, but the appear of a pay-to-play is absolutely staggering here. Publix *chose* to make those payments at that time. And the Publix heiress—Julie Jenkins Fancelli—*chose* to aid DeSantis's patron, Trump, as Publix was paying DeSantis. Sorry, I don't see coincidence here.
Moskowitz may be right that DeSantis had engineered things so only Publix was an option. It wouldn't explain DeSantis saying yes right after getting $50K from Publix. It wouldn't explain Publix's heiress being the *only donor* willing to bail out—that same week—DeSantis's patron.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
PROOF offers comprehensive reportage and analysis on the largest, most complex FBI case in history: the federal criminal investigation of the violent insurrection Donald Trump launched on January 6, 2021.
(PS) There's a new feature on PROOF: a listing of "Top Free Articles" on the PROOF homepage for those looking to browse what I've been up to before deciding whether to subscribe. The list aids subscribers, too, as it offers quick-links to PROOF features (e.g. lectures, podcasts).
(IMAGE) For those looking for the new list of links at PROOF:
(ANNOUNCEMENT) PROOF now features as comprehensive a readable-length report on the January 6 insurrection as you'll find. I've minimized links to past PROOF reporting to avoid running afoul of Substack's memory limits.
▪️ Everything in this PROOF report is documented—with major-media sources—elsewhere at PROOF. If you have a subscription, you've probably seen it.
▪️ However—critically—there's also BREAKING NEWS in this report.
▪️ It involves the Trump campaign's involvement in the insurrection.
▪️ A major insurrectionist group—Stop the Steal—has turned on Trump's campaign.
▪️ The group's leader, now in hiding, claims Trump's campaign sabotaged plans for January 6 to make it more likely a riot would occur.
▪️ This remarkable claim appears to be supported by the evidence.
MSNBC: Attacker Identified As 25 Year-Old Noah Green of Indiana; Facebook Page Reportedly Identifies Him As Follower of Nation of Islam; Motive for Attack Remains Unknown msnbc.com/msnbc/amp-vide…
(PS) All of the initial reporting on this attack at the Capitol indicated that the attacker was white. There are indications now that that was inaccurate. mediaite.com/crime/breaking…
(NOTE) If Republicans don't understand that *every time* there's a domestic terror attack in DC going forward, the whole country will suspect it's a continuation of the domestic terror movement *still being run* by the head of the GOP, they're living in a goddamned fantasy world.
I'm writing a PROOF article that aims to summarize *everything* about 1/6. Every person responsible. How/why everything happened. So many details Substack might not let me put so many links in one piece. It's harder than I expected. Why didn't I realize it'd be near-impossible?
The seed of this article was an obscure interview I read that seems to explain exactly why 1/6 unfolded as it did and who was responsible. I've never seen it reported on elsewhere. It's like a key that unlocks January 6. I want to tell the story in one article and make it public.
A big part of being a criminal investigator or criminal defense attorney, both jobs I've had, is distinguishing good from bad evidence when the source is generally unreliable. We think good evidence always comes from reliable people. It just doesn't work that way, unfortunately.
Three groups are responsible for January 6. So far just one is being dealt with by DOJ.
🟨 PARAMILITARIES: Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, Three Percenters
🟧 GRASSROOTS: Stop the Steal, Women for America First
🟥 TRUMP CAMPAIGN: Trumps, Guilfoyle, Pierson, Wren, et. al.
Stay tuned.
(PS) The well-sourced writing I'm working on now draws the connections between these three groups—which have started to turn on one another.
Unfortunately, even journalists who have been keeping up with the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are flying blind on the other two groups.
(PS2) America needs to understand that we are in the *very* early stages of the prosecution of the *first* of *three* classes of GOP persons responsible for the insurrection. I'm impatient, so I plan to show at PROOF, with meticulous sourcing, where all this is headed eventually.
Just wait until anyone who understands math runs the correct numbers. At his current rate of growth, Greenwald will make $2.34 million in his first year—and well over double that his second year.
(PS) The reason Andreeson Horowitz did this is that—unlike many in journalism—they know how to calculate annual income from a growing (not static) concern. When journalists realize the annual income Greenwald is headed for, it will change the conversation. google.com/amp/s/mobile.r…
(PS2) The way the internet works is about to change fundamentally. Greenwald being well on his way to an eight-figure annual income is actually a far bigger signal of where we're headed than anything related to NFTs. I suspect that sometime soon journalists will write that story.