1/ One of the most peculiar things about Emacs is how you can spend ages (literally years) not using a feature - sometimes not even knowing about its existence - and then suddenly having your life change when you find it. org-mode agenda is one of those features.
2/ I've been using Emacs for time management for maybe a decade now, and I can honestly say I would not have made it through the PhD without it. Its such a long winded, uncertain effort over a long period of time that without some form of organisation I would have just got lost.
3/ Emacs has enabled me to keep close tabs on all the work carried out, to subdivide it as and when things change, with absolutely minimal fuss. I had been using things such as GitHub issues, Jira, etc etc for decades and always found them to be a pain. org-mode is just seamless.
4/ And of course, with minimal effort you can also plot nice graphs. What I like about it is how little effort it required from my part. I had tried other forms of time management and gave up, because I just can't be bothered to context-switch when I am in the thick of it.
5/ Anyways, to cut a very long story short, my life is now managed by org-mode and I feel much happier about it. However, what I never thought about doing - and really, don't ask me why I didn't - is to using org-mode agenda. Maybe its because PhD work is all under your control.
6/ However, at work you have deadlines, meetings, and a constant stream of events coming at you. And I suddenly - wouldn't it be nice if that was integrated with my nice, seamless time management system. And, of course, it being Emacs, there is a solution: org-mode agenda.
7/ I've been using it for a few weeks, and honestly, I don't know how I was able to live all this time without it :-D Here's a good intro (screenshot from that post) blog.aaronbieber.com/2016/09/24/an-…
8/ I think this is one of the reasons why many people end up "living" inside of Emacs - you just can't be bothered to context switch to other tools and re-learn all of that muscle memory. Plus, you start to integrate all of your workflows into one "supra" workflow. Which is nice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marco Craveiro

Marco Craveiro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarcoCraveiro

2 Apr
1/ Another Friday, another Emacs thread. So, you've seen me ranting and raving about Emacs, and by now you may be asking: "So, are you telling me I should abandon X and use Emacs?" Sadly, the answer is almost always... "no, don't do that". But let me try to explain why.
2/ If you are a new-ish dev, you should try to optimise for two things simultaneously: a) things you find interesting *and* b) things that will make you employable. Therefore, you should use whatever environment and languages employers want. Sadly, that won't be Emacs (or Vim).
3/ Experienced devs end up converging to a productive workflow, adapted to a myriad of languages. In my 20 or so years of dev, I faced C, C++, VB, C#, Java, Kotlin, Ruby, Powershell, Bash, Python... Far too many languages to recount. Each had a preferred corporate dev environment
Read 13 tweets
27 Mar
1/ Yet another thread on Emacs. One of the most important points in the life of an Emacs "user" (the quotes will become clear in a moment) is the moment where you realise that Emacs is not an editor but a framework to build editors, which happens to have a sample for you to try.
2/ I mean, most of us know this, but even then, its difficult to appreciate its logical consequences. Anyway, lets do a simple example for those not in the know. Say I start a project in VS Code, and create a new class. It prompts me to install extensions, and stuff happens...
3/ Then I go back to my class and if by magic, my environment is entirely configured to use C#. Now, as a regular developer I don't even bother distinguishing the different services the environment is giving me - I don't really care, all I care about is that my C# needs are met.
Read 12 tweets
12 Mar
1/ Bem, sextou, e já à muito tempo que não faço um daqueles rants, de modo que tá na hora né. Hoje queria falar um pouco de energia, realpolitik e o futuro desse nosso laboratório de sobrevivência chamado Angola. Quem tá interessado, melhor pegar aquela cuca...
2/ Acho que até o mais desatento entre nós reparou nas várias e diversas notícias que têm aparecido sobre projectos de energias não renováveis em Angola. De repente, depois de muito tempo com tudo parado, agora parece está tudo em movimento.
3/ No contexto dos mercados financeiros, isto é bastante estranho: já é do conhecimento geral que nenhum pais desenvolvido vai fazer ou financiar projectos novos no campo das energias não renováveis. Há mesmo uma grande pressão para desinvestir, de todos os lados.
Read 13 tweets
3 Nov 20
1/ Devo de começar por dizer que eu não sou um "saudosista" e que pouco - ou melhor, nada - conheci da Angola colonial. A independência para mim foi uma das nossas maiores vitórias alcançadas. Mas este post no Facebook mostra um lado interessante da nossa capacidade productiva. Image
2/ É importante comparar laranjas com laranjas: a economia colonial não era uma economia de mercado, o que significa que a viabilidade de muitos destes negocios não é fácil de aferir; seriam estas fábricas e fazendas produtivas apenas por usarem trabalhadores mal remunerados?
3/ Mas o que não se pode negar é que, comparando esta lista com o que foi feito desde 2002, não andámos muito para a frente desde o fim da guerra. E pior, se quisermos comparar alguém mais próximo temos só que ver o Rwanda (já nem falo do Botswana).
Read 8 tweets
29 Jul 20
1/ After many years of thinking that hydrogen was a waste of time, it suddenly hit me: in the absence of a *major* breakthrough to allows us to create cheap batteries at will, hydrogen is going to be _the battery_.
2/ The growth of the solar and wind capacity will be much, much faster than the battery capacity and soon - as it always happens with capitalism - it will overshoot demand. Then it'll overshoot battery capacity. At that point you need to store energy by any means - even if lossy.
3/ That's where hydrogen comes in. It may be wildly inefficient when compared to lithium batteries, but if energy has a marginal cost close to zero, hey who cares? Better to store the energy in hydrogen than to throw it away.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!