Unsure about a 9/11 commission. I was disappointed in House Select Committee last year: Members were not briefed, they either tossed softball questions on the science or politically-charged questions. No intellectual curiosity about what truly happened
thebulwark.com/we-need-a-9-11…
To really understand why we lost 555,000 Americans we need to do a deep dive in things that require some sophistication in science for instance.....
1) Why did we miss the entry of the virus from Europe into NYC at the end of January or early February. Why did it take until March 1 to diagnose the first case of COVID-19 in NYC? This created our first terrible wave. That was something far beyond politics.
2) Why didn't we get diagnostic testing up and running? Why did HHS feel it was necessary to prepare their own test, which did not materialize?
3) Whose decision was it to not organize a federal response to COVID-19 in 2020, insisting instead on the failed strategy to place the states in the lead, when everyone knew that would fail.
4) Who orchestrated the White House disinformation campaign (although I think I know that one) that began in the spring of 2020. Who directed West Wing to say such outrageous things and make phony claims
5) Why were we asleep when the virus surged in the Southern states over last summer. The states so ill-informed and unprepared, that's when we really needed a federal response
6) Same for our worst-of-all fall devastating fall surge that began in the Upper Midwest
Understanding these questions goes way beyond the politics, it requires understanding some real failures in science and health policy. After what I saw last year coming from the House, I'm not confident they have the intellectual chops to do this, and the Senate is too political
Maybe the National Academies, but they are just so tentative and skittish about anything to do with politics: that too is a problem.
It really takes a group that can be facile with both the science and politics, one that understands a very intricate web of the geopolitics of science, politics, and disease, along the lines that I outlined in my new book @JHUPress
And i almost forgot, thank you @gregggonsalves for his tweet, that’s what tipped me off to the 9-11 article

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD

Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PeterHotez

31 Mar
Actually no: the disparity began earlier when science policy decisions were made to focus primarily on innovation at the expense of developing cheap, traditional technologies that could be scaled for LMICs. We’re now working to fill that gap, and with some progress
The new technology vaccines so far can be made in quantities sufficient for North America Europe, but not yet for billions of doses required for SubSaharan Africa (1.1 billion people), Latin America (650 million people), poor Asian countries (400 million). We need 4 billion doses
Hopefully ours can make a difference and help fill the gap
Read 4 tweets
31 Mar
Many thanks ⁦@chucktodd⁩ for hosting me ⁦@MeetThePress⁩ discussing the new ⁦@WHO⁩ report on COVID19 origins + why i think more is needed to trace how it began in terms of animal origins. For instance new ⁦@ScienceMagazine⁩ paper tracing it back to October
Here’s the excellent paper from UCSD on the origins in Hubei science.sciencemag.org/content/early/… I think by sending in international teams to take samples from animals livestock wastewater we might really get to the origins
I also said this is in the enlightened self interest of the Chinese given that they’ve now suffered through two major coronavirus epidemics: SARS in 2003 and SARS-2 in 2019. We’ve done a lot of work in China, even keeping a lab in Shanghai in the 1990s studying parasitic disease
Read 4 tweets
27 Mar
Thread 1/5: I'm profoundly worried about the absence of COVID-19 vaccines for Africa and Latin America. Remember the scale required: with 1 billion people in SubSaharan Africa and 650 million in Latin America, that's almost 1.7 billion people, easily 3.5 billion doses of vaccine
2/5 Who will provide 3.5 billion doses of vaccines? The COVAX facility is excellent in its design, but honestly the vaccines just aren't there: 1) mRNA vaccines cannot be scaled to that level, eventually but not now 2) probably not J&J/Novavax, 3) and new concerns about AZOx
3/5 While innovation is important and produced some great vaccines for the US and Europe, it's as if no one gave adequate attention to ensuring that simple, unfussy, durable, low cost vaccines would be made available for Africa and Latin America?
Read 6 tweets
22 Mar
Many thanks ⁦@AlisynCamerota⁩ ⁦@JohnBerman⁩ for hosting me ⁦@NewDay a little bit to smile about given we now have about one-half of the US population partially immune either from a single vaccination or recovery from previous infection, also good news from AZOx
It's now likely AZ will file for EUA with our FDA, that's important not only to have a 4th COVID19 vaccine in the US, but it's reaffirming for use of the vaccine globally. Remember we are depending on this one to become a workhorse vaccine for Latin America, possibly Africa.
In the meantime, our COVID19 numbers are not coming down due to the rise of the B.1.1.7 variant and the fact that America is traveling, 1 million people this weekend in airports, spring break, governors prematurely lifting restrictions. We're doing all we can to help the virus
Read 4 tweets
20 Mar
My interview last night with ⁦@Yamiche⁩ on the ⁦@NewsHourpbs.org/newshour/show/…
And my three accompanying recent papers. The first:

In @PLOSBiology @PLOS entitled "Anti-Science Kills"

"Without science, democracy has no future."
Maxim Gorky, April 1917

journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ar…
The second, also in @PLOSBiology @PLOS on the need for scientists to expand their role in science communications and public outreach
journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ar…
Read 6 tweets
16 Mar
1/5: Many thanks ⁦@chucktodd⁩ for hosting me on ⁦@MeetThePress⁩ discussing a globalizing antiscience antivaccine movement and it’s far reaching effects
2/5 it first accelerated out of Texas in 2015, which is when I began confronting it. It linked to the Tea Party forming antivaccine Antiscience PACs, and then spread into other red states. This explains new findings that 1/3 US population is vaccine hesitant mostly from the Right
3/5 this helps to explain why we’re seeing Fox anchors push antivaccine tropes in the last couple of weeks, also Great Barrington links to antivaccine groups. Doing my best to go on Conservative news outlets to head it off.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!