The higher the SNP/Alba vote, the greater the pro-independence representation at Holyrood. This is a fact, backed by the data. I'll happily break down any region in Scotland to prove it.
SNP/SNP is ineffective for pro-independence supporters because of the AMS handicap. A fact.
SNP/SNP is ineffective for pro-independence supporters because of the AMS handicap. A fact.
I haven't seen a substantiated argument for there being more pro-independence representation with SNP/SNP, because the data rejects it.
SNP's list vote is divided by anything from 5 (South) to 10 (Central, Glasgow) times.
Alba's list vote can't be divided. It's worth more.
SNP's list vote is divided by anything from 5 (South) to 10 (Central, Glasgow) times.
Alba's list vote can't be divided. It's worth more.
This is how the Additional Member System operates.
This is a unionist designed electoral system, built to prevent an independence majority with one party. It wasn't built to handle two pro-independence parties.
Don't split the vote; share it & increase pro-indy representation.
This is a unionist designed electoral system, built to prevent an independence majority with one party. It wasn't built to handle two pro-independence parties.
Don't split the vote; share it & increase pro-indy representation.
Those planning on voting SNP/SNP are enabling more unionist MSPs.
Or they can switch to SNP/Alba (especially in 6 out of 8 regions) and remove a load of them.
SNP division: 5 - 10 times the list vote.
Alba division: ZERO because of no constituency presence.
Why refuse this?!
Or they can switch to SNP/Alba (especially in 6 out of 8 regions) and remove a load of them.
SNP division: 5 - 10 times the list vote.
Alba division: ZERO because of no constituency presence.
Why refuse this?!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
