We need a whole new relationship with our blue planet. This means abandoning micro-consumerist bollocks and confronting the powerful interests trashing it.
My column: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
It’s not just malpractice Seaspiracy exposes, but an entire worldview.

A worldview that describes any fish population not caught to the max as "underfished" or "underexploited".

We need to learn respect and wonder for the ecosystems we currently treat as nothing but seafood.
I've just discovered, via @Unpop_Science, that I made a mistake in this column: #Seaspiracy's figure for illegally caught fish is in fact supported in the scientific literature: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
I confused this paper for another, that has been retracted.
I've asked the Guardian to correct my article. Sorry about my mistake, which was particularly ironic in a passage about mistakes.
It's a good illustration of how, even with the best intentions and intense fact-checking, we can get things wrong.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

1 Apr
Of course some of the people exposed by #Seaspiracy are going ballistic about it. What else can they do but shoot the messenger? The years of collusion, cowardice and failure have come home to roost.
As for the film's other critics: yes, there are details we could quibble over, as with all films. But, you know what? I didn't hear a word from them about the massive falsehoods and misdirections in Blue Planet 2 and Blue Planet Live. Why is it only the radical films they attack?
I don't think I've ever seen a series of such pathetic attempts to knock something down as the criticisms aimed at #Seaspiracy. They're either wrong, or so trivial/irrelevant that they just look like sour grapes. Finally, this issue is properly on the map. We should be cheering.
Read 6 tweets
1 Apr
I strongly relate to what Louis de Bernieres says. I was also sent to a boarding school when I was 8. Even before you consider the horrific things that happened in those places, the abuse began with the act of separation. theguardian.com/books/2021/mar…
This system of institutional abuse inflicted immense harm not only on the children put through it, but also on the country they grew up to dominate. monbiot.com/2019/11/11/the…
In my experience, the most damaged people are those who loudly proclaim "it never did me any harm" or "it made me the man I am". Processing what happened and finding peace takes years of work and brutal honesty. In some ways it's like recovering from addiction.
Read 5 tweets
31 Mar
Something's changed - I was allowed on the Today programme this morning!
I was challenged, among other things, on the #Seaspiracy claim that 46% of plastic in The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is from fishing nets. Here's the source, in case anyone doubts it
nature.com/articles/s4159…
Many of the attacks on Seaspiracy are themselves based on false claims, or false refutations of the statements the film makes. It's a lot more rigorous than Cowspiracy, and stands up well to examination.
The segment started at 0823 this morning. The Today programme gave the subject a fair bit of time, for which I thank them:
bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/li…
Read 5 tweets
31 Mar
There are shocking examples in #Seaspiracy of "conservation" groups collaborating in the destruction of marine life. But in my view the worst of all is @RSPCA_official. It was founded to defend animals. Instead, it endorses mass slaughter by salmon farms. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
.@RSPCA_official was very lucky not to have been featured in Seaspiracy, because its collusion is even more disgraceful than the examples that were highlighted. It "accredits" the slaughter of 200 million salmon a year, without, imo, effective safeguards.
Like many big groups, the RSPCA is way behind its members. Many people who care about the lives of animals have now gone vegan. But the RSPCA, which is meant to be *leading* on animal welfare, instead gives its seal of approval to the killing of animals on an industrial scale.
Read 4 tweets
26 Mar
1. I watched #Seaspiracy on Netflix last night. It’s a brilliant expose of the greatest threat to marine life: fishing.
This thread explores why we have so seldom heard the the truth about what’s happening to our oceans.
#TellTheTruth
@GretaThunberg
netflix.com/gb/title/81014…
2. The BBC and other broadcasters have repeatedly failed to tell the truth. Blue Planet II was a massive exercise in misdirection. It misled us about the main reasons for ecological collapse, emphasising entirely trivial issues like plastic straws instead
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
3. I don’t believe it set out to deceive us. But Blue Planet II was typical of the BBC’s cowardice and wilful ignorance when it comes to environmental destruction. Almost reflexively, it avoids conflict with powerful economic interests.
Read 13 tweets
17 Mar
At last! A crucial, missing piece of the climate jigsaw. For some time, I've been speculating that trawling is likely to release significant amounts of carbon from the seabed. But there was no data. Now there is, and it's even worse than I imagined.
time.com/5947430/bottom…
It was a remarkable gap in the science, and I find it surprising that no one has sought to fill it until now. Sometimes, even the biggest questions don't get asked.
It's yet another powerful argument against trawling. To protect habitats and wildlife, we urgently need to exclude this horrendously destructive practice from most of our seas. Now we know it imposes a major carbon cost as well.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!