Großartige Studie zu den Mechanismen, die den Irrsinn „Social-Bot-Forschung“ erst möglich gemacht haben:
„The natural selection of bad science“ royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
„The natural selection of bad science“ royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
„The persistence of poor methods results partly from incentives that favour them, leading to the natural selection of bad science. This dynamic requires no conscious strategizing [...] by scientists, only that publication is a principal factor for career advancement.“
„Selection for high output leads to poorer methods and increasingly high false discovery rates. [...] Improving the quality of research requires change at the institutional level.“
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
