Did you know the word “lesbian” is falling out of practice in queer spaces?

The reason has everything to do w/ “lesbian” being the ONLY word in the LGBTQ lexicon that refers to women alone.
That’s right. It’s not just the straights uncomfortable with the “L-word.” Even most QUEER WOMEN use the word “gay” to describe themselves before they EVER use “lesbian.”

Why?
Historians observe that words referring to women tend to “derogate” over time. Meaning they become pejoratives. Whereas words referring to men retain their meaning.
Take for example the word “mistress.” Originally this word referred to the woman in charge of the estate. Now it refers to a skanky lady who sleeps around with married men.

But “mister” still just means “mister.”
Or take “sissy.” Originally this word was a familiar/loving way to refer to a sister. Now it’s a way to accuse someone of being a coward and/or to make fun of effeminate men.

“Buddy,” on the other hand, still just means “buddy.”
Even words referring to female animals tend to derogate, like “bitch.” Feminized animals suffer the same fate—think of “pussy.”
In other words, feminine words become slurs while masculine words stay the same. In fact, it’s common for masculine words that have legitimately NEGATIVE connotations to become neutral or even POSITIVE with time.
Ever heard someone say they’re gonna “pimp” their ride? They’re not talking about a dude who manages prostitutes and takes their money. They’re talking about upgrading their vehicle...making it *better.*
Meanwhile, the word “hussy” went from referring to a “housewife” to referring to a brazen little slut.

The unconscious subtext we all accept: pimp = powerful dude = good; hussy = powerful woman = bad.
So...can you imagine why the word “lesbian” is falling out of practice even amongst women who casually refer to themselves as “gay” on a daily basis?

That’s right. Sexism. Or in the case of women, internalized sexism.
Some ppl blame the stigma attached to the word “lesbian” on the association with trans-exclusive rhetoric. And to be fair, they’re right about one thing. Trans-exclusive rhetoric is dehumanizing and unacceptable.
Trans people can be and are lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, straight, and anything else that human beings are able to be, and rhetoric seeking to exclude trans-people is harmful and violent.
But if transphobia is the reason why “lesbian” is stigmatized, why don’t we see the same thing happening to “gay”? If anything, gay men have a reputation for being not only trans-exclusive but also misogynistic. And yet I STILL hear women calling themselves “gay” all the time.
For some reason, queer AND cishet people are increasingly associating the word “lesbian” w/ whatever they happen to consider to be bad. Gay men aren’t necessarily any better or worse than lesbians, but somehow the things we consider to be bad aren’t sticking to the word “gay.”
Language reflects the values of the culture in which it evolves. In this case, we can see the effects of sexism happening in real time.
Gay = liberated man = good. Lesbian = liberated woman = bad. “Gay” will retain its meaning & become more positive & generally applicable over time. “Lesbian” will ONLY retain its negative connotations & become increasingly a slur over time.
This process has already begun. While the word “gay” hasn’t made the transformation completely, I wouldn’t be surprised if in another 50 years “that’s so gay” is no longer an insult but a compliment. It already IS a compliment in many circles.
As for “lesbian,” many queer women already feel dirty if they use this word to describe themselves. Unless things change, it’ll only worsen w/ time.
Oh and also... check out this book if your interested in learning about the derogation of feminine words!
amazon.com/dp/006286887X/…
For those responding, please keep in mind that I 100% support bi/pan & non-binary ppl calling themselves lesbians. My point is to describe how masc versus femme words tend to evolve.
Gay originally referred to men. Lesbian originally referred to women. Linguistically, this means we can predict the direction of their evolution.
Masc words tend to become defined by their best elements until they eventually become generalizable and broadly used by pretty much everyone. Femme words tend to become defined by their worst elements until they eventually become niche and, finally, a slur.
This is how masc versus femme words tend to evolve. It’s a well-documented phenomenon and it undergirds why negative associations tend to “stick” to the word lesbian but not gay, even though gay male communities can be just as toxic.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bridget Eileen Rivera

Bridget Eileen Rivera Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TravelingNun

28 Apr
People think it’s weird that I’m gay & celibate & don’t find celibacy toxic. They want to know how I “do it.”

To begin with, I don’t start with sin.
Most Christians start their approach to sexual ethics with sin. Why? What good does this do? It creates a theology obsessed with all of the ways we might “fall to temptation” instead of how we might follow the witness of Jesus in our lives.
Jesus came to defeat the power of sin. Why lay our foundations in a thing that Jesus came to abolish?
Read 8 tweets
31 Mar
LGBTQ people experience some of the highest rates of medical discrimination in the country. When we experience illness, many believe we deserve to be sick & die.

And now it’s legal in Arkansas to deny us ANY healthcare service on the grounds of “moral conscience.”
The only qualifier in this bill is that doctors must provide care in the case of an “emergency.” This is laughable, as the vast majority of healthcare services—many if not most of which are lifesaving—do not fall under the category of “emergency.”
Some argue that the bill does not name LGBTQ people explicitly, so it’s not actually targeting LGBTQ people. Again, this is laughable. We all know what demographics this law is going to be used against the most. Laws like these in the US *always* target LGBTQ people and women.
Read 13 tweets
30 Mar
I’m gay & celibate & can honestly say that celibacy has been a life-giving experience for me. Gay celibacy is not inherently toxic.

But here’s the thing: When you tell gay ppl they *must* be celibate or else go to hell, you are not preaching the Gospel. You are preaching death.
Celibacy is life-giving, for gay ppl as well straight, when discovered in the *midst* of relationship with Jesus Christ, not as a condition to be in relationship with Jesus in the first place.
No one’s salvation hinges on what we do, think, or believe a/b gender & sexuality. If it did, none of us would go to heaven. “He who is w/o sin, cast the first stone.” If you think your theology on gender & sexuality is perfect, you’re in for a surprise when you get to heaven.
Read 16 tweets
11 Mar
1. White progressives going at Jesus for being “racist” toward the Syrophoenician woman is peak 2021.

News flash. “Racist” Jesus isn’t a thing.
2. The claim centers on the story of the Syrophoenician woman begging Jesus to cast a demon out of her daughter. Jesus responds, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs” (Mk 7:27).

What’s going on here? Is Jesus being a racist a**hole?
3. The Bible is a piece of literature as much as it is a historical document. Pay attention to the structure of the Gospel of Mark and it becomes pretty clear what’s going on.
Read 23 tweets
22 Feb
The idea that rape is a product of “sexual temptation” stems from a toxic relationship to sexuality.
If you believe that sexual attraction is an overwhelming animal urge that requires a Herculean level of self-control granted only by prayer and spiritual maturity, then it’s easy to believe that ppl (in particular cisgender men) are constantly on the verge of raping other ppl.
In this worldview, *not* raping ppl becomes a virtue unto itself. If sexual attraction is always & only ever compelling people to sexually devour each other, then *not* raping ppl is a sign of self-control!
Read 11 tweets
5 Feb
“How can you be gay & celibate & not inherently self-hating?”

I get asked this question a LOT. People assume that the only reason a gay person would be celibate is internalized homophobia.

But they’re wrong.
Gay people can be celibate for all kinds of reasons.

Maybe they just don’t like sex very much and don’t particularly want to have it. Yes, it’s possible to have a sex drive and experience sexual attraction but still not enjoy having sex.
Or maybe they’re just asexual and don’t experience sexual attraction in the first place. Yes, gay people can be asexual and asexual people can be gay.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!