Authoritarian party stay resilient because they're cohesive. These are signs the PAP juggernaut is fraying, slowly but surely. channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore…
A post from party colleague and speaker of parliament. Reads like a political obituary even though HSK remains in the cabinet as Finance Minister.
I stand corrected, HSK steps down as Finance Minister in 2 weeks.
Authoritarian political parties are resilient becoz it has institutionalized channels for cadres to advance careers within a stable system of patronage; creates a quasi-constitutional form of power transfer, institutionalizing & regulating succession (Jennifer Gandhi 2008)
Even if intra-party rules are informal, they offer guidelines for party elite, curbing conflict & minimizing potentially destabilizing power struggles.
Failure to these intra-party rules and SOPs, to steer a transition from one leader to another, could cause regimes to fragment and eventually fall apart (Natasha Ezrow and Erica Frantz 2011).
Scholars have noted roles of law and courts in authoritarian regimes, largely as institutions of repression (see Jothie Rajah 2021). However, role of recent crowdfunding to overcome lawsuits/repression in SG presents new & subtle tools of resistance reut.rs/39D1ZFd
(1) Some rudimentary thoughts (or questions) on the coup, from a non-Burma watcher, but a Southeast Asianist and a student of civil-military relations.
(2) Apparent that the Tatmadaw is concerned about its political position vis-a-vis the NLD. However, I think it is important to disaggregate personal vs corporate interests.
NLD won 396/476 seats in Nov 2020. This was 83% of total; than 70% in 2015. Embarrassing for Tatmadaw, who thought NLD would lose ground after 2015. Corporate reason for coup.