Kevin Williamson has responded to the criticism of his "we need *less* democracy" column yesterday, and I'm flattered to have made the #1 spot.

The link just goes to my account generally, which lets his distorted "summary" stand on its own, but ... #1!

nationalreview.com/corner/fewer-v…
He won't provide the actual link for some reason, but I believe this tweet yesterday is what he's referring to.

Now, if you (unlike Williamson) actually read that thread, you'd see it wasn't about one article, but a good number of NR pieces.

Williamson denied that segregationists & the architects of modern conservatism made common cause in the 50s & 60s, so I used NR to show how they did.
At the end of the short thread, I sarcastically mocked the very sort of argument that Williamson wrongly attributes to me in his "summary"

I thought my take was pretty obvious. Hell, I even use scare quotes on "logic"!
But yes -- drawing conclusions from the evidence, giving accessible citations instead of misleading "summaries" and, you know, just reading what other people actually wrote instead of what you imagined -- this *is* the sort of thing that passes for argument at Princeton.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin M. Kruse

Kevin M. Kruse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KevinMKruse

24 Mar
This thread doesn't just show that the filibuster does, in fact, have a considerable "racial history" but that the argument of its defenders -- that it somehow promotes compromise -- is completely wrong.
When Southern Democrats filibustered anti-lynching bills in the 1930s, they walked away with a total victory. The bills never became law, and no compromise measures were passed.

The filibusterers won everything they wanted. Their opponents got nothing.
When Southern senators filibustered civil rights bills in the 1960s, they walked away in complete defeat.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 wasn't watered down as a result of their defiance; indeed, it was strengthened.

Liberals got everything they wanted. The filibusterers lost.
Read 4 tweets
23 Mar
Filibuster against civil rights bill, 1874

Filibuster against civil rights bill, 1875

Filibuster against a pension for a black official, 1906

Filibuster against confirmation of a black official, 1909 ImageImageImageImage
Filibuster against anti-lynching bill, 1921

Filibuster against anti-lynching bill, 1922

Filibuster against anti-lynching bill, 1925

Filibuster against monument to black WWI veterans, 1926 ImageImageImageImage
Filibuster against anti-lynching bill, 1935

Filibuster against anti-lynching bill, 1938

Filibuster against bill targeting racial discrimination in employment, 1945

Filibuster against Truman's civil rights proposals, 1948 ImageImageImageImage
Read 8 tweets
25 Feb
1-0! #USWNT
2-0! #USWNT
God, I love Carli Lloyd’s play
Read 7 tweets
16 Feb
Wait, L. Brent Bozell IV was part of the MAGA Mob?

Feels like there's an interesting history of the devolution of modern conservatism to be written through that family line.
"Devolution" might be too strong a word given some of the activities of the earlier L. Brent Bozells, but then again, none of them were ever indicted for insurrection so ...
Read 4 tweets
13 Feb
So the Trump camp's argument now is that they'll get the upper hand by calling Muriel Bowser and Nancy Pelosi? What?
First of all, to call any particular witness, I believe they'd need to get 51 votes -- which would mean peeling away a Democrat.

Possible, I guess, but ... then what?
If the point is to show that Bowser or Pelosi didn't do enough to prep for the riot ahead of time -- that's some bizarre blame-shifting, like faulting a homeowner for not having deadbolts after they suffered a home invasion.
Read 5 tweets
9 Feb
It's OK, Bruce Castor, we've all tried to wing a public talk and failed miserably.
Really going well. Really, really, really well.
Really, really, REALLY well.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!