Don’t you just love the bemused response to groups angry at the border in the Irish Sea & the lies told about it?
“But they voted for it” & “suck it up, you wanted hard Brexit, dumbos” miss the point.
There is one. Bear with me./1.
Stoking violence is completely irresponsible. Those doing it must stop.
But it mightn’t be a bad idea if the rest of the UK - not least supporters of the lunatic, hard Brexit of which we’re experiencing the early, predictably awful throes - understood what’s really going on./2.
People in NI, of whatever political, cultural or other persuasion, aren’t stupid.
They’re like everyone else: products of circumstance & their own ability to respond. /3.
So, let’s think about a group (no need to give it a name) which emphatically feels a united Ireland would be terrible for them. For whatever reasons. In fact, any NI separation from the UK would be pretty much as bad. /4.
And, actually, anything which reduces the distinction between being part of the UK & part of Ireland (used here to mean the Republic) is, at best, a slippery slope to something fundamentally unacceptable.
How would that group behave? /5.
Let’s consider the Good Friday Agreement/Belfast Agreement, EU membership/ Brexit, and the Northern Ireland Protocol.
The group would oppose the GFA/BA. Obviously. /6.
Short of the extraordinarily unlikely prospect of Ireland joining a UK-Ireland-only customs union & single market, the GFA/BA (as has often been said, & often (incorrectly) denied) is predicated on EU membership of both the UK & Ireland. /7.
Or, as a minimum, their concurrent membership of the EU’s Customs Union & Single Market, or closely equivalent arrangements.
If you’re deeply opposed to the GFA/BA, you’re automatically (if you understand how many beans make five) highly enthusiastic about Brexit. /8.
But not just any Brexit.
Staying in the EU’s CU+SM, or anything even close, doesn’t cut it. You need a diamond-hard Brexit. /9.
One of which hardly a member of the so-called “European Research Group” (no understanding of Europe, propaganda & emotion not research, though, arguably, a group) ever dared dream.
All trace of the CU+ SM has to be eradicated from NI life. /10.
That way, the operation of the GFA/BA, & the all-Ireland effects it’s designed to facilitate, can be made impossible.
It’s clear, now we’ve got this far, that such a grouping in NI would strongly favour the imposition of a strict land border across the island of Ireland. /11.
The well known difficulties of enforcing it, & the likelihood of a return to violence as a result of it, would be recognised, regretted (not necessarily by all, though probably most), but accepted as the price of achieving the main - & fundamental - goal. /12.
So, how would this NI group react when told they can have their hard Brexit, but to get it they need to allow a border down the Irish Sea, separating NI to a significant extent from the rest of the UK? /13.
Wouldn’t they do all they could - while performatively opposing it - to facilitate a deal which appears radically at odds with their interests, but which in fact makes certain their ultra hard Brexit is secured? /14.
And then work to shred the arrangements (the Northern Ireland Protocol) leaving a land border across the island of Ireland as the only available option?
The answer’s obvious.
And it’s what’s happening. /15.
This entirely foreseeable (& foreseen) situation is immensely dangerous.
It was - shamefully - ignored, misunderstood, mishandled &/or lied about by three successive UK prime ministers & their teams. All of whom, still in any form of public office, should resign. /16.
While efforts to make the NIP work as well as possible & to de-escalate rhetoric & tensions are worthy & right, the original sin is the unavoidable problem. /17.
Leaving the EU’s Customs Union & Single Market creates an unsustainable situation for the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland, & for the whole island of Ireland. One which carries a high risk of being, literally, fatal. /18
It opens up a space in which a group or groups of the sort described (once again, no names necessary here) can feel it possible to reverse their defeat of 23 years ago - on the GFA/BA. /19.
If we just remind ourselves that such groups consider success in their endeavour to be essential, because defeat poses an existential threat, we can, finally, understand them. /20.
We can, also, repudiate their objectives & actions.
But let’s not display our own dimwittedness by patronisingly thinking them stupid or ignorant. /21. End (but see notes in following tweet).
Notes on above 🧵
Originally posted on 6 Feb 2021. Later removed by me, as part of routine monthly/ two-monthly deletion.
This version is lightly edited compared to the original. Purely to improve drafting clarity (hopefully that’s worked!).
All comments welcome.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Brexiters & their backers have minimal capacity to bring about EU apocalypse.
Yet Brexit’s failure, as a supposed strategic project for boosting the UK’s geopolitical & economic position, is guaranteed & starkly visible if the EU continues. /2.
Which explains much of the prevalent, increasingly shrill, emotionally needy anti-EU rhetoric. And curious features of Brexit which appear consciously to price in abject failure. /3.
Look, I know it’s too much to ask, in some cases at least, that political candidates have a passing familiarity with history or major foreign languages. But, with all due respect, you’d think someone who’s had as many opportunities in life as @LozzaFox would. But no ... a🧵/1.
Mr Fox’s call for freedom translates well into German. A cynic might say he’s aware of this history & has gone ahead in spite - or even because - of it. I’d like to give him the benefit of the doubt. I’ll assume ignorance. /2.
Ah, you object, but that was about “freeing” a country from its shackles, prohibitions & evil leaders. Not a capital city. A different point, surely?
In the short term, there’s no choice but strain all of @BorisJohnson’s sinews to ensure the best possible relationship with the EU & the smoothest possible functioning of the NIP. /2.
But we shouldn’t imagine that tinkering, including the major step of an SPS (Sanitary & Phytosanitary) agreement with the EU - if that’s available, given UK sovereigntism & EU “cherry picking” concerns - can result in anything other than a dangerously unstable arrangement. /3.
A brief history of the last 70 years of 🇩🇪 - 🇬🇧 relations. Short 🧵/1.
Many Germans, including much of the diplomatic establishment, felt like this about 🇬🇧. Often despite considerable provocation, especially in the English tabloids. /2.
Some, usually only in private, but then quite vehemently, had a different perspective on 🇬🇧.
But still, with 🇺🇸 in charge, even those 🇩🇪 sceptics felt able to work extremely closely with 🇬🇧. /3.
(a) following UK, German & wider EU reporting today is genuinely terrifying. Unless the UK can find a way to reintegrate itself into one of the two mission critical components of the Euro-Atlantic alliance - the EU - & the EU to accept it, .../2.
... we’re in serious trouble.
This isn’t about Bridlington Bangers to Belfast, or other such trivialising tropes used by some UK ministers.
And, if I were @SecBlinken’s chief of staff, I’d have this dossier, with options for US intervention, on his desk today; /3.