1/n If you watch the story unfolding of the meltdown of @tage_rai, social/behavioral sciences editor for the AAAS' Science Magazine, no less, & his repeated false claims about @jessesingal, a lot of issues become very obvious. None of these issues are new, but are now pressing
2/n Tage Rai has been given the help of several very big accounts, run by those with higher professional positions. This is a witch-hunt at the top of the foodc-hain; the perps don't give a stuff about little folks, nonetheless their social-putsch tactics will affect us all.
3/n The tactics include: swear blind to the most amazing claims (Rai is explicitly claiming harassers have been actively sent by Jesse Singal, & some of those harassers are actually ringing up Rai on his phone, doing heavy breathing & hoarsely voicing the name Jesse to him).
4/n If you're at all sane & normal, you'd laugh. Rai's claims about the phonecalls *may* be true, though I doubt it (it's also exactly the kind of claim that would bring copycat trolls out in masses); what is certainly untrue is that any harassers were sent or directed by Singal
5/n But you ask, where is the hammer? The hammer is the pressure on companies. One CEO of a MTurk-associated company often used by social-scientists was put under heavy flaming & pressure by top-level accounts until she kowtowed and went along with the insane Rai claims.
6/n One aim is to drive Jesse Singal out of any journalistic opportunity at all, i.e. to destroy his livelihood. Another aim is to further purge the US scientific establishment; no dissent will be allowed.
7/n I specify the US science establishment(s) here, because this kind of crap wouldn't fly one tiny nanosecond in the UK. The merest hint that legal action for defamation was being undertaken would have Rai & the others suddenly retracting like crazy.
8/n Ironically, *successful* defamation suits cost roughly the same base, around at least $250,000 or so, in both the USA and UK, but you have one heck of a better chance, & a far faster one, in the UK (no fiddle-faddle about state & federal jurisdiction, for a start).
9/n Since legal action for defamation in the UK is much faster on the whole than in the USA, & since there's less tolerance for sheer lying, the mere credible threat of legal action is often enough to make perps buckle pronto. Tage Rai's lies wouldn't fly.
10/10 So in the UK, someone like Jesse Singal wouldn't have to shell out $250,000; since it's an iron-cast case of baseless defamation, the mere letter from a solicitor would have the UK equivalents of Tage Rai et al running to retract.
New thread:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Skellett

Tim Skellett Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Gurdur

8 Apr
1/n Some of the other issues, which I'll try to do quickly and in collection, following on from the second thread. There are various specific trans issues, and honesty ones, but they're not my concern here, they can wait for specific threads.

2/ I know some of you are upset about Jesse Singal & Katie Herzog being less than deeply appreciative of Graham Linehan. Thing is, as Kate said, they're journalists; their aspiration & credo. Linehan's an activist. It's a different thing, despite the Brave New Panopticon World
3/ Before any of y'all try yelling at me about Jesse & Katie, do you know Graham Linehan once Blocked me, precisely because I was mildly, politely sceptical about some allegedly trans claims?
Read 5 tweets
8 Apr
1/n New thread, from the old thread (). Lots of general & specific issues. Can you tell which issues *won't* get covered? Help for Third-World nations & nationals, actual concrete, affordable plans for healthcare for the poor in the USA. Not a glimpse.
2/n As retweeted by Tage Rai, the *putative* demands have zero connection to reality, but they're only the alleged ones (in trade-union-speak, these are not even ambit claims; they're pure BS). Abolish prisons? Huh.
3/n Access to healthcare? A pity about the roughly 10 to 15% of the USA that has no medical insurance at all, but who cares about the poors, amirite. Bankruptcies? Who cares. That trans people have the same access as non-trans is simply lied away.

Read 11 tweets
8 Apr
One would expect* a professor to be able to grasp the difference between "denial of healthcare" and "refusal to implement certain procedures or medications when fully inappropriate".
_____
*kidding. I've known too many professors for whom logic was just ancient Greek
oh WELL, forget I said anything. Abolishing the nation-state, are you? My oh my, big ideas. Mind you, I'm too busy just trying in my own small way to be of genuine practical help to some Third-World people, which I'm sure you can't be bothered with.
Do you realize only a tiny minority worldwide lack "nationalist privilege"? And they would love to have it too.
Read 4 tweets
7 Apr
we need Dr. Naomi Wolf to tie up the loose ends on this for us, to connect the dots
Without Dr. Naomi Wolf, it's just not the same. Much-repeated exclamation-marks are a poor substitute

Read 5 tweets
7 Apr
huh. Chaser, I guess. Personally I've now seen quite a few people, both trans and non-trans, claim there is no such thing as biological sex. Any old how, example above.

Chaser. A confused one. By the way, primary sex organs are not the only sex-determined things.

Read 5 tweets
7 Apr
What the hell is wrong with you weirdos over there, @NRO?
a/ Sheer bollocks to the claim "aren’t acting entirely in good faith".

b/ Williamson/NRO conflates representation with legitimization; it's a category error among others that plagues this piece.

Let's take a look at a concrete example, next tweet.
c/ Williamson/NRO writes: "If we’d had a fair and open national plebiscite about slavery on December 6, 1865, slavery would have won in a landslide". Two things absolutely wrong with that claim, guess what they are before you reply.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!