Share this page!

C Pita Profile picture
Twitter logo
9 Apr, 4 tweets, 2 min read
Great thread for those asking "why is this even a debate?" or "isn't this just semantics?"
Re. "Its just Semantics":

Re. "Is this really a debate?". Watch this video for yourself...

While this is from July 2020... so far there has been no public movement from Dr. Conly or the WHO IPAC committee on this issue. If anything they have dug-in their heels further.

And finally... my personal favourite 🔥 take..

aricjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with C Pita

C Pita Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CPita3

C Pita Profile picture
10 Apr
Let's unpack Dr. Conly on the Precautionary Principle.

Q: Why weren't HCW provided N95s, given the advanced warning that SARS2 might be Airborne?

Conly: "I need to see a much higher level of evidence..."
(🤔 That's not how the Precautionary Principle works)

🧵 1/
He then makes a pretty bold claim:

"certainly from our experience in Alberta, in Phase 1" the HCWs wore "gowns, gloves, medical masks"... and "not a single HCW transmission"... despite "highly infectious, hot viral patients"

*Phase 1* is defined here: MARCH-APRIL 2020

2/ Image
So why the "Phase 1" qualifier? Why is he using evidence from a 1 to 2 month period that was over a year ago, and extrapolating out to "8 months of continuous contact time", rather than just telling us what happened during the past year?

Oh... crap..

3/
calgaryherald.com/news/staff-at-…
Read 10 tweets
C Pita Profile picture
9 Apr
The acne is getting the most laughs (including from me), but the others are legit anti-masker talking points.

This is a crisis folks.. we have anti-maskers in charge at WHO.
This isn't an exaggeration.. just read through this 🔥🗑. Written on behalf of the WHO IPAC committee, and Dr. Conly defended these points today.

aricjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
ucalgary.yuja.com/V/Video?v=3323…
Read 4 tweets
C Pita Profile picture
30 Jan
Convincing new study re nosocomial infections of HCWs despite surgical masks and distancing. @kprather88 @jljcolorado @jmcrookston @ShellyMBoulder @linseymarr @HuffmanLabDU @RougeMatisse @DavidElfstrom @lisa_iannattone @DFisman @trishgreenhalgh @akm5376

academic.oup.com/ofid/advance-a…
Just want to clarify that it's likely the Mother was the Index case. Child tested negative at the hospital. Mother was asymptomatic but developed symptoms 2 days after discharge, tested positive on day 4. Child tested positive on day 6.
Another key quote:

"As some of the report's authors were taking part in the medical round and got infected, we can declare there was full compliance with PPE guidelines."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @CPita3 has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @CPita3!

Read all threads by @CPita3